Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2313: kvm, x86: Adding support for SE mode execution

2014-11-19 Thread Alexandru Dutu via gem5-dev
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2313/ --- (Updated Nov. 20, 2014, 12:36 a.m.) Review request for Default. Changes ---

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2313: kvm, x86: Adding support for SE mode execution

2014-11-19 Thread Alexandru Dutu via gem5-dev
> On Nov. 18, 2014, 10:43 p.m., Gabe Black wrote: > > util/m5/m5ops.h, line 57 > > > > > > Why do we need psuedo ops for syscalls when there are actual syscall > > instructions? The same goes for page faults. I'm not saying

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2313: kvm, x86: Adding support for SE mode execution

2014-11-19 Thread Andreas Sandberg via gem5-dev
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2313/#review5487 --- src/arch/arm/pseudo_inst.cc

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2313: kvm, x86: Adding support for SE mode execution

2014-11-19 Thread Andreas Sandberg via gem5-dev
> On Nov. 18, 2014, 10:43 p.m., Gabe Black wrote: > > util/m5/m5ops.h, line 57 > > > > > > Why do we need psuedo ops for syscalls when there are actual syscall > > instructions? The same goes for page faults. I'm not saying

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2313: kvm, x86: Adding support for SE mode execution

2014-11-18 Thread Gabe Black via gem5-dev
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2313/#review5480 --- src/arch/x86/pseudo_inst.hh

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2313: kvm, x86: Adding support for SE mode execution

2014-10-13 Thread Nilay Vaish via gem5-dev
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2313/#review5413 --- src/sim/pseudo_inst.cc

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2313: kvm, x86: Adding support for SE mode execution

2014-09-30 Thread Alexandru Dutu via gem5-dev
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2313/ --- (Updated Sept. 30, 2014, 4:21 p.m.) Review request for Default. Changes ---

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2313: kvm, x86: Adding support for SE mode execution

2014-09-19 Thread Andreas Sandberg via gem5-dev
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2313/#review5338 --- src/arch/x86/tlb.cc C

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2313: kvm, x86: Adding support for SE mode execution

2014-09-16 Thread Alexandru Dutu via gem5-dev
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2313/ --- (Updated Sept. 16, 2014, 3:34 p.m.) Review request for Default. Changes ---

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2313: kvm, x86: Adding support for SE mode execution

2014-09-15 Thread Alexandru Dutu via gem5-dev
> On Aug. 14, 2014, 10:05 a.m., Andreas Sandberg wrote: > > I'm really not happy about the use of kvm-specific ports magic here. It > > would have been nicer having a m5ops based interface that just passes the > > fault/syscall to the arch-specific code from any CPU model that uses the > > m5o

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2313: kvm, x86: Adding support for SE mode execution

2014-09-12 Thread Alexandru Dutu via gem5-dev
> On Aug. 14, 2014, 10:05 a.m., Andreas Sandberg wrote: > > I'm really not happy about the use of kvm-specific ports magic here. It > > would have been nicer having a m5ops based interface that just passes the > > fault/syscall to the arch-specific code from any CPU model that uses the > > m5o

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2313: kvm, x86: Adding support for SE mode execution

2014-09-12 Thread Alexandru Dutu via gem5-dev
> On Aug. 14, 2014, 10:05 a.m., Andreas Sandberg wrote: > > I'm really not happy about the use of kvm-specific ports magic here. It > > would have been nicer having a m5ops based interface that just passes the > > fault/syscall to the arch-specific code from any CPU model that uses the > > m5o

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2313: kvm, x86: Adding support for SE mode execution

2014-08-25 Thread Alexandru Dutu via gem5-dev
> On Aug. 14, 2014, 10:05 a.m., Andreas Sandberg wrote: > > I'm really not happy about the use of kvm-specific ports magic here. It > > would have been nicer having a m5ops based interface that just passes the > > fault/syscall to the arch-specific code from any CPU model that uses the > > m5o

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2313: kvm, x86: Adding support for SE mode execution

2014-08-14 Thread Andreas Sandberg via gem5-dev
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2313/#review5250 --- I'm really not happy about the use of kvm-specific ports magic here. It w

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2313: kvm, x86: Adding support for SE mode execution

2014-08-01 Thread Alexandru Dutu via gem5-dev
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2313/ --- (Updated Aug. 1, 2014, 3:52 p.m.) Review request for Default. Changes --- Br