This looks correct to me. The way it's setup with the apache parent
pom is that the root module will have the fully buildable source, all
the individual modules still have their source and jdocs for ide
integration.
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at
On 26/05/2010, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:14 AM, sebb wrote:
> > It's a bit confusing to have two copies of the N&L files in the root
> > of the archive:
> > LICENSE and LICENSE.txt have the same content.
> > NOTICE and NOTICE.txt have significantly different content.
Thanks Ant!
And we'll be updating the website today to have all the valid
disclaimers and links back to the Incubator website.
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:02 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:11 AM, ant elder wrote:
>>
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:11 AM, ant elder wrote:
>
I can't find all the source for the release. AFAICT the only way to
recreate all the release artifacts would be from the svn tag but thats
not enough as an ASF release must i
On May 26, 2010, at 9:39 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:11 AM, ant elder
wrote:
I can't find all the source for the release. AFAICT the only way to
recreate all the release artifacts would be from the svn tag but
thats
not enough as an ASF release must include a sour
On May 26, 2010, at 10:14 AM, sebb wrote:
On 26/05/2010, Les Hazlewood wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:11 AM, ant elder
wrote:
I can't find all the source for the release. AFAICT the only way
to
recreate all the release artifacts would be from the svn tag but
thats
not enough as an A
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:14 AM, sebb wrote:
> It's a bit confusing to have two copies of the N&L files in the root
> of the archive:
> LICENSE and LICENSE.txt have the same content.
> NOTICE and NOTICE.txt have significantly different content.
> LICENSE and NOTICE are not in SVN as far as I can
On 26/05/2010, Les Hazlewood wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:11 AM, ant elder wrote:
>
> >>> I can't find all the source for the release. AFAICT the only way to
> >>> recreate all the release artifacts would be from the svn tag but thats
> >>> not enough as an ASF release must include a sou
On 26/05/2010, Les Hazlewood wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 7:12 AM, sebb wrote:
>
> > The staging site appeared to be part of the vote as it was not
> > specifically excluded.
>
>
> This was a mistake - it probably should have been excluded. AFAICT,
> staging sites are _not_ considered rel
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:11 AM, ant elder wrote:
>>> I can't find all the source for the release. AFAICT the only way to
>>> recreate all the release artifacts would be from the svn tag but thats
>>> not enough as an ASF release must include a source release. If I've
>>> just missed it and all t
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 7:12 AM, sebb wrote:
> The staging site appeared to be part of the vote as it was not
> specifically excluded.
This was a mistake - it probably should have been excluded. AFAICT,
staging sites are _not_ considered release artifacts because they're
never shipped/distribut
On 26/05/2010, ant elder wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> >
> > On May 26, 2010, at 2:00 AM, ant elder wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Kalle Korhonen
> >> wrote:
> >>> This is the first incubator release for Apache Shiro, version
> >>> 1
While I haven't looked at what Shiro has done, your
explanation of the relevance of a buildable source
package sounds fine.
- Original Message
> From: ant elder
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, May 26, 2010 11:11:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Shiro version 1.0.0-i
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On May 26, 2010, at 2:00 AM, ant elder wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Kalle Korhonen
>> wrote:
>>> This is the first incubator release for Apache Shiro, version
>>> 1.0.0-incubating. The release is made following the stand
On 26/05/2010, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On May 26, 2010, at 3:31 AM, sebb wrote:
>
> > On 25/05/2010, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
> >> This is the first incubator release for Apache Shiro, version
> >> 1.0.0-incubating. The release is made following the standard
> >> Apache/Maven release process
On May 26, 2010, at 3:31 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 25/05/2010, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
>> This is the first incubator release for Apache Shiro, version
>> 1.0.0-incubating. The release is made following the standard
>> Apache/Maven release process as documented at
>> http://maven.apache.org/developers/
On May 26, 2010, at 2:00 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Kalle Korhonen
> wrote:
>> This is the first incubator release for Apache Shiro, version
>> 1.0.0-incubating. The release is made following the standard
>> Apache/Maven release process as documented at
>> http://ma
Hi,
The Apache Aries community is pleased to announce the Apache Aries
0.1-incubating release. This is the first release of Apache Aries.
The Aries project delivers a set of pluggable Java components enabling
an enterprise OSGi application programming model. This includes
implementations and exte
On 25/05/2010, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
> This is the first incubator release for Apache Shiro, version
> 1.0.0-incubating. The release is made following the standard
> Apache/Maven release process as documented at
> http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/apache-release.html. This
> is a lazy
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
> This is the first incubator release for Apache Shiro, version
> 1.0.0-incubating. The release is made following the standard
> Apache/Maven release process as documented at
> http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/apache-release.html. T
20 matches
Mail list logo
