- Original Message
> From: Jonathan Ellis
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 12:05:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Joe Schaeferwrote:
> >
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> The relevant commit is r665124- Simon Forman doesn't yet have an ICLA
>> on file with the ASF.
>
> I should probably explain the issue in more detail, since only the handful
> of people who have read the Facebook CCLA as it pertains to Thrift
- Original Message
> From: Joe Schaefer
> To: general@incubator.apache.org; antel...@apache.org
> Cc: cassandra-...@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 3:20:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>
> -
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 10:46 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 14/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
>> The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
>> Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the
>> Incubator PMC for this release.
>>
>> Cassandra is a massively sc
- Original Message
> From: Joe Schaefer
> To: general@incubator.apache.org; antel...@apache.org
> Cc: cassandra-...@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 1:13:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>
> -
- Original Message
> From: ant elder
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: cassandra-...@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 1:05:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:56
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 09:56 -0700, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
> The distributed libthrift.jar is also missing a LICENSE.txt and
> NOTICE.txt in its META-INF dir.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-566
--
Eric Evans
eev...@rackspace.com
bject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>>
>> - Original Message
>>
>> > From: ant elder
>> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> > Cc: cassandra-...@incubator.apache.org
>> > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2
Works for me, but to get my +1 I need to see
libthrift.jar sorted out.
- Original Message
> From: Eric Evans
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 12:55:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>
>
- Original Message
> From: Joe Schaefer
> To: general@incubator.apache.org; antel...@apache.org
> Cc: cassandra-...@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:58:16 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>
> -
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 07:58 -0700, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> I would like to see at least a mention of the lib/licenses directory
> in the LICENSE file.
Does the patch attached to CASSANDRA-371[0] suffice?
[0]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12416885/v1-0001-CASSANDRA-371-top-leve
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:53 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 18/08/2009, ant elder wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> > On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The vote is now closed with the following results:
>> >>
>> >> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder,
- Original Message
> From: ant elder
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: cassandra-...@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 10:31:57 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01
On 18/08/2009, ant elder wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> > On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
> >>
> >> The vote is now closed with the following results:
> >>
> >> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
> >> * 0 votes: 0
> >> * -1 votes:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
>>
>> The vote is now closed with the following results:
>>
>> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
>> * 0 votes: 0
>> * -1 votes: 0
>>
>> The vote passes.
>
> I wish to raise an objectio
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:01 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
>>
>> The vote is now closed with the following results:
>>
>> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
>> * 0 votes: 0
>> * -1 votes: 0
>>
>> The vote passes.
I was surprised to read this,
On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> The vote is now closed with the following results:
>
> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
> * 0 votes: 0
> * -1 votes: 0
>
> The vote passes.
I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries
in the binary re
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Ant,
>
> On Aug 17, 2009, at 8:40 AM, ant elder wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Craig L Russell
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Ant,
>>>
>>> On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:33 AM, ant elder wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, sebb w
The vote is now closed with the following results:
* +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
* 0 votes: 0
* -1 votes: 0
The vote passes.
Thanks everyone.
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 15:08 -0500, Eric Evans wrote:
> The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apa
Hi Eric,
On Aug 17, 2009, at 8:55 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 13:00 +0100, sebb wrote:
Given whats being said in the "Thrift release
legal issues" thread i think it should be ok to have the 3rd party
licenses separate,
I disagree. It must be possible to find all the LICENSE f
Hi Ant,
On Aug 17, 2009, at 8:40 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Craig L
Russell wrote:
Hi Ant,
On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:33 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, sebb wrote:
>> the NOTICE file looks acceptable to me too.
>
> AIUI, the NOTICE file ne
+1 from me.
On Aug 18, 2009, at 2:12 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Eric Evans
wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 13:00 +0100, sebb wrote:
Given whats being said in the "Thrift release
legal issues" thread i think it should be ok to have the 3rd party
licenses separate,
On 17/08/2009, ant elder wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> > Hi Ant,
> >
> > On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:33 AM, ant elder wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, sebb wrote:
> >>
>
> >> the NOTICE file looks acceptable to me too.
> >
>
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 5:51 PM, ant elder wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Robert Burrell
> Donkin wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:40 PM, ant elder wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Craig L Russell
>>> wrote:
Hi Ant,
On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:33 AM, ant elder wro
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Robert Burrell
Donkin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:40 PM, ant elder wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Craig L Russell
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Ant,
>>>
>>> On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:33 AM, ant elder wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:40 PM, ant elder wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>> Hi Ant,
>>
>> On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:33 AM, ant elder wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>
>
> >> the NOTICE file looks acceptable to me too.
> >
>>>
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 13:00 +0100, sebb wrote:
>> > Given whats being said in the "Thrift release
>> > legal issues" thread i think it should be ok to have the 3rd party
>> > licenses separate,
>>
>> I disagree. It must be possible to find all
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 13:00 +0100, sebb wrote:
> > Given whats being said in the "Thrift release
> > legal issues" thread i think it should be ok to have the 3rd party
> > licenses separate,
>
> I disagree. It must be possible to find all the LICENSE files starting
> at the initial LICENSE file
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Ant,
>
> On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:33 AM, ant elder wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> the NOTICE file looks acceptable to me too.
>
> AIUI, the NOTICE file needs to give attributions to all
Hi Ant,
On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:33 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, sebb wrote:
>> the NOTICE file looks acceptable to me too.
>
> AIUI, the NOTICE file needs to give attributions to all 3rd
party code
> included in the propose release.
no - just require 3rd party
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> >> the NOTICE file looks acceptable to me too.
>> >
>> > AIUI, the NOTICE file needs to give attributions to all 3rd party code
>> > included in the propose release.
>>
>>
>> no - just require 3rd party attribution notices and relocated
>> co
On 17/08/2009, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 1:00 PM, sebb wrote:
> > On 17/08/2009, ant elder wrote:
> >> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 10:46 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >> Given whats being said in the "Thrift release
> >> legal issues" thread i think it should be ok t
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 1:00 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 17/08/2009, ant elder wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 10:46 AM, sebb wrote:
>> Given whats being said in the "Thrift release
>> legal issues" thread i think it should be ok to have the 3rd party
>> licenses separate,
>
> I disagree. It must
On 17/08/2009, ant elder wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 10:46 AM, sebb wrote:
> > On 14/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
> >> The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
> >> Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the
> >> Incubator PMC for t
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 10:46 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 14/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
>> The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
>> Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the
>> Incubator PMC for this release.
>>
>> Cassandra is a massively sc
On 14/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
> The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
> Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the
> Incubator PMC for this release.
>
> Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent, distributed,
> struct
+1 (binding)
I followed the thread and the provided stuff seems to be fine.
-M
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
> The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
> Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the
> Incubator PMC for t
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the
Incubator PMC for this release.
Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent, distributed,
structured key-value store.
Podling Vote thread:
http:
38 matches
Mail list logo
