Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: [VOTE] CeltiXfire Project Proposal

2006-07-13 Thread general . support
This message is for all users sending submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ** This address is no longer receiving support or assistance submissions. ** Aanval now requires all support and assistance requests to be entered into our new form based support ticket system. To submit for support or

Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: [VOTE] CeltiXfire Project Proposal

2006-07-13 Thread general . support
This message is for all users sending submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ** This address is no longer receiving support or assistance submissions. ** Aanval now requires all support and assistance requests to be entered into our new form based support ticket system. To submit for support or

Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: [VOTE] CeltiXfire Project Proposal

2006-07-13 Thread general . support
This message is for all users sending submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ** This address is no longer receiving support or assistance submissions. ** Aanval now requires all support and assistance requests to be entered into our new form based support ticket system. To submit for support or

Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: [VOTE] CeltiXfire Project Proposal

2006-07-13 Thread general . support
This message is for all users sending submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ** This address is no longer receiving support or assistance submissions. ** Aanval now requires all support and assistance requests to be entered into our new form based support ticket system. To submit for support or

Re: [VOTE] CeltiXfire Project Proposal

2006-07-13 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
I'd like to vote +1 (non-binding) Regards, Matthias On 7/12/06, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, There has been plenty of discussion around the CeltiXfire proposal, we feel that all the issues forwarded have been addressed, and we would now like to officially propose CeltiXfire to

Re: [VOTE] CeltiXfire Project Proposal

2006-07-13 Thread James Strachan
+1 On 7/13/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to vote +1 (non-binding) Regards, Matthias On 7/12/06, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, There has been plenty of discussion around the CeltiXfire proposal, we feel that all the issues forwarded have been

Re: [VOTE] CeltiXfire Project Proposal

2006-07-13 Thread peter royal
On Jul 13, 2006, at 2:48 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: There has been plenty of discussion around the CeltiXfire proposal, we feel that all the issues forwarded have been addressed, and we would now like to officially propose CeltiXfire to the Incubator for consideration. The proposal can be

[New Project] proposal

2006-05-01 Thread Steven Paligo
Everyone, I'd like to see a project started up to create higher-level java components that leverage other ASF projects for web development (a shopping cart system using struts or a calendar app). I think this would greatly help the web developer community. What interest would you all have in

Re: [VOTE-RESULT] Yoko - A CORBA Server Sub-Project Proposal - PASSED

2006-02-08 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alan D. Cabrera wrote: The only person who's stepped up and volunteered is Geir. Is there anyone else? Are two mentors enough? I'm there also. - -- #kenP-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer,

RE: [VOTE-RESULT] Yoko - A CORBA Server Sub-Project Proposal - PASSED

2006-02-08 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Alan, Please note that this is not a Geronimo sub-project. Incubator projects are just that: Incubator projects whose final destination will be determined at graduation. Amongst other issues, we want to be inviting and inclusive of whomever wants to participate, including other ASF projects.

Re: [VOTE-RESULT] Yoko - A CORBA Server Sub-Project Proposal - PASSED

2006-02-08 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
On 2/8/2006 5:16 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alan D. Cabrera wrote: The only person who's stepped up and volunteered is Geir. Is there anyone else? Are two mentors enough? I'm there also. Yep. Thanks Ken! Regards, Alan

[VOTE-RESULT] Yoko - A CORBA Server Sub-Project Proposal - PASSED

2006-01-31 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
Results of the vote [1] on Yoko - A CORBA Server sub-project proposal [2]: +1 David Blevins +1 Jacek Laskowski +1 John Sisson +1 Alan Cabrera +1 Jeff Genender +1 Davanum Srinivas +1 Matt Hogstrom +1 David Jencks +1 Dain Sundstrom +1 Bruce Snyder +1 Greg Wilkins +1 Jan Bartel +1

RE: [VOTE-RESULT] Yoko - A CORBA Server Sub-Project Proposal - PASSED

2006-01-31 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Alan, Could you folks turn up some additional Mentors? We have not adopted a formal policy to require more than one --- yet --- but I'd like to see more than one. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE-RESULT] Yoko - A CORBA Server Sub-Project Proposal - PASSED

2006-01-31 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
Noel J. Bergman wrote, On 1/31/2006 7:27 PM: Alan, Could you folks turn up some additional Mentors? We have not adopted a formal policy to require more than one --- yet --- but I'd like to see more than one. Sure, good idea. Regards, Alan

Re: Project Proposal: Subvertive

2005-07-28 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
You forgot to mention the part where it will byte-weave the compiled diff into the classfile... geir On Jul 22, 2005, at 12:22 PM, Upayavira wrote: Subvertive Incubator Proposal -- Here is a proposal for an incubator project that originally arose over beers at

Re: Project Proposal: Subvertive

2005-07-28 Thread Larry Meadors
I think that was to be a part of the 1.1 release? Larry On 7/28/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You forgot to mention the part where it will byte-weave the compiled diff into the classfile... geir On Jul 22, 2005, at 12:22 PM, Upayavira wrote: Subvertive Incubator

Re: Project Proposal: Subvertive

2005-07-28 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
Reading over it, I think it actually says that. I can attest to the fact that beer was involved in the initial design process of this thing... On Jul 28, 2005, at 5:45 PM, Larry Meadors wrote: I think that was to be a part of the 1.1 release? Larry On 7/28/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL

Re: Project Proposal: Subvertive

2005-07-23 Thread Trustin Lee
+1. Looks very interesting! Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/

Project Proposal: Subvertive

2005-07-22 Thread Upayavira
Subvertive Incubator Proposal -- Here is a proposal for an incubator project that originally arose over beers at ApacheCon EU 2005, and was received with thunderous applause during the lightning talks at that same ApacheCon. Introduction Java, when first

Re: Project Proposal: Subvertive

2005-07-22 Thread Davanum Srinivas
ROTFL :) :) :) For a second i was trying to figure out if i overslept and today is April 1st :) -- dims On 7/22/05, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Subvertive Incubator Proposal -- Here is a proposal for an incubator project that originally arose over beers at

Re: Project Proposal: Subvertive

2005-07-22 Thread Larry Meadors
Uhm, +1? ;-) Larry On 7/22/05, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ROTFL :) :) :) For a second i was trying to figure out if i overslept and today is April 1st :) -- dims On 7/22/05, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Subvertive Incubator Proposal --

New Project Proposal: Sinon

2005-04-25 Thread Rodrigo Fernandes Moreira
Hi, My name is Rodrigo and I am a partner of a Brazilian company called Eteg, that is focused in Java software development. I will present a project that I would like to become part of the Apache Incubator. In 2001 we launched a site called eBabel

Re: Project proposal

2005-02-04 Thread Henri Yandell
Biggest seems to be: http://opensource.org/OSA/ It seems to be both for people and for projects. The judges seem to be: ESR + Jeremy Allison, Larry Augustin, Jim Gettys, Keith Packard, and Guido van Rossum. Legate status was conferred on Tim O'Reilly of O'Reilly and Associates and to David

Project proposal

2005-02-02 Thread Martin Marinschek
Hi there, I have the following proposal for a project. I admit it does not have a very large technological aspect, rather a sociological one, and I don't even know if the ASF will be the right institution to host such a project, still I would be interested in your feedback if you like the idea or

Re: Project proposal

2005-02-02 Thread Alex Karasulu
Martin Marinschek wrote: Hi there, I have the following proposal for a project. I admit it does not have a very large technological aspect, rather a sociological one, and I don't even know if the ASF will be the right institution to host such a project, still I would be interested in your feedback

Re: Project proposal

2005-02-02 Thread Erik Abele
On 02.02.2005, at 17:26, Martin Marinschek wrote: ... - I propose the establishment of such a Prize in the Open Source movement, from people using and developing Open Source - for people developing Open Source, on the base of a yearly vote... ... What do all of you think about a project like

RE: Project proposal

2005-02-02 Thread Noel J. Bergman
This does not seem to be an Incubator issue. You might want to raise it on [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Project proposal

2005-02-02 Thread Martin Marinschek
Ok, good! I thought anyways that maybe it would not be a good idea to host it at Apache as this might seem to impartial for the means of such a project... On the other hand, I do not believe it would be a good strategy to try to get all the big open source players into one boat beforehand and

Re: Project proposal

2005-02-02 Thread Martin Marinschek
By the way... I looked at the ISOC prize and I think it is both not ambitious enough and not dedicated enough to Open Source projects for that what I would have in mind ;) Does anyone know of a prize that would come close? If yes, I would need to stop right away, I guess ;) regards, Martin

RE: Official Apache Directory Project Proposal Submission

2003-09-13 Thread Alex Karasulu
-Original Message- From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 5:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Official Apache Directory Project Proposal Submission creating a database suitable for LDAP implementations might be of more general use

Re: Official Apache Directory Project Proposal Submission

2003-09-13 Thread Peter Donald
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 01:30 am, Alex Karasulu wrote: Are you talking about code sharing between the two projects? Or are you proposing the bundling of an LDAP server, possibly a X.500 server, a meta directory, other JNDI providers (like the one for java:comp), some common naming and directory

Re: Official Apache Directory Project Proposal Submission

2003-09-12 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Noel J. Bergman wrote: ... So my recollection is correct, that the stumbling block is Thomas' name credit, yes? Too bad, since otherwise it would seem to be a good fit for db.apache.org. Having his name on the license is not /impossible/ to have, as Stefano Mazzocchi has his on the Cocoon

Re: Re: Official Apache Directory Project Proposal Submission

2003-09-11 Thread aok123
yet ;-). BU, Alex From: Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2003/09/11 Thu PM 12:27:01 EDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Official Apache Directory Project Proposal Submission Am writing up a post, but you might also want to say something about this on [EMAIL

Re: Official Apache Directory Project Proposal Submission

2003-09-11 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Noel J. Bergman wrote: There are some other candidates that the DB PMC could look into incubating and adopting. For example, http://axion.tigris.org/ is a rather obvious candidate, especially considering the committer list (geir jvanzyl mpoeschl rwald). I would personally recommend to ask the

Re: Official Apache Directory Project Proposal Submission

2003-09-11 Thread Brian McCallister
inline On Thursday, September 11, 2003, at 02:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Both and RDBMS and an LDAP server are databases really. This is exactly what gets me excited. OODBMS's are basically dead (sad as they are nice to develop on) O/R tools are getting as easy to develop on as the

Re: Official Apache Directory Project Proposal Submission

2003-09-11 Thread Brian McCallister
Argh, keep emailing with unsubscribed account... My apologies if a moderator approves a clone of this message later I wasn't so much looking for projects to put under the DB wing, but thinking of people who might be interested in LDAPd. An LDAP most definately is *not* an RDBMS, but it is

Re: Official Apache Directory Project Proposal Submission

2003-09-11 Thread Brian McCallister
I wasn't so much looking for projects to put under the DB wing, but thinking of people who might be interested in LDAPd. An LDAP most definately is *not* an RDBMS, but it is a protocol for accessing hierarchical databases. After filesystems and DNS, ldap's are probably the most widely used

RE: Official Apache Directory Project Proposal Submission

2003-09-11 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Jochen Wiedmann suggested: Noel J. Bergman wrote: There are some other candidates that the DB PMC could look into incubating and adopting. For example, http://axion.tigris.org/ is a rather obvious candidate, especially considering the committer list (geir jvanzyl mpoeschl rwald). I

Re: Official Apache Directory Project Proposal Submission

2003-09-11 Thread Brian McCallister
I wasn't so much looking for projects to put under the DB wing, but thinking of people who might be interested in LDAPd. An LDAP most definately is *not* an RDBMS, but it is a protocol for accessing hierarchical databases. After filesystems and DNS, ldap's are probably the most widely used

Re: Re: Official Apache Directory Project Proposal Submission

2003-09-11 Thread aok123
. After all it is all about the community. Sincerely, Alex Karasulu From: Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2003/09/11 Thu PM 03:00:37 EDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Official Apache Directory Project Proposal Submission Argh, keep emailing with unsubscribed

Re: Re: Official Apache Directory Project Proposal Submission

2003-09-11 Thread aok123
Noel has a very good idea for providing bundles of JNDI ObjectFactorys and StateFactorys for the various published LDAP schema objectclasses so you can read them as objects from a relational entry. So these factories for doing O/R would be packaged into the server and clients as a jar. For

Re: Official Apache Directory Project Proposal Submission

2003-09-11 Thread Paul Hammant
Noel, I would personally recommend to ask the hsqldb guys (http://hsqldb.sf.net) Absolutely. I had that in my original post, pre-editting. The license is compatible except, as I understand it, for the fact that the original author wants his name Thomas works for a commercial RDBMS

RE: Official Apache Directory Project Proposal Submission

2003-09-11 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Paul, I would personally recommend to ask the hsqldb guys (http://hsqldb.sf.net) The license is compatible except, as I understand it, for the fact that the original author wants his name Thomas works for a commercial RDBMS company. License change has been raised before :-( I'm a part time

Re: Official Apache Directory Project Proposal Submission

2003-09-11 Thread Jim Wright
Alex and Brian, Regarding the relationship between RDBMS and LDAP... I believe this document says why RDBMS is wrong for LDAP: http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/378.html On the other hand IBM have implemented LDAP in DB2. See: http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/sj/392/shi.html Since

Re: Official Apache Directory Project Proposal Submission

2003-09-11 Thread Robb Penoyer
Hi Jim, The original pre-release versions of LDAPd were implemented with a BerkeleyDB backend, with custom index management etc, much like the openldap articale you reference. Those early designs, did have a contracted backend store interface defined (thank-you Mr magic - Alex), and indeed

RE: Official Apache Directory Project Proposal Submission

2003-09-11 Thread Alex Karasulu
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Official Apache Directory Project Proposal Submission Alex and Brian, Regarding the relationship between RDBMS and LDAP... I believe this document says why RDBMS is wrong for LDAP: http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/378.html On the other hand IBM have implemented LDAP

RE: Official Apache Directory Project Proposal Submission

2003-09-11 Thread Alex Karasulu
: Official Apache Directory Project Proposal Submission Alex and Brian, Regarding the relationship between RDBMS and LDAP... I believe this document says why RDBMS is wrong for LDAP: http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/378.html On the other hand IBM have implemented LDAP in DB2. See: http

Project Proposal: Configuration Utility

2003-07-12 Thread Bruce Conrad
I have developed a very useful Configuration utility that provides very simple, flexible and powerful functionality for managing one or more configurations in a java environment. It allows for a combination of a hierarchy of configuration files, substitution variables and property variables.

<    1   2   3