ds,
-brian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Steven Elling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: 16 September 2003 03:32
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [gentoo-user] Samba & NT Domain
On Monday 15 September 2003 06:15, Brian Reichholf wrote:
> Actually, let me rephrase that:
>
>
prüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Brian Reichholf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: 15 September 2003 12:01
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [gentoo-user] Samba & NT Domain
First off:
I know, this might not be the `correct' place to post this question, but
google is just not working out fo
First off:
I know, this might not be the `correct' place to post this question, but
google is just not working out for me (I can't find any decent answer(s)),
the samba mailing list is just 90% questions, 10% answers, and the gentoo
forums didn't work for me either.
Problem:
Using Samba in an NT 4
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 02:33:08AM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:49:06AM +0200, Kjetil Brekke wrote:
>> > Does anyone have some experience or ideas on how to do this.
>> > I have seen a couple of patches, but there's not much documentation
>> on how to accomplish th
ah, well, i just noticed that directfb was emerged and i started to
emerge xdirectfb :)
does anybody perhaps have any resources on how i can get started with
directfb _instead_ of Xfree?
cheers,
-bri
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 00:35, MIKE MacMartin wrote:
> > so i did an `emerge -s directfb' and got
mmh, i'm curious, and i would like to try directFB
i am currently using xfree and wanted to emerge directfb and/or
xdirectfb
so i did an `emerge -s directfb' and got the obvious results:
`dev-libs/DirectFB', `dev-libs/DirectFB-extra' and 'x11-base/xdirectfb'
but neither of these will work if i go
i'm trying to create a wallpaper in gimp though i seem to be
experiencing some slight problems...
i would like to include some Japanese (Kanji) symbols, so i included
"canna" and "cjk" with my use variables, and even when selecting some
basic plugins in gimp i can't display the font(s) all that gi
i have a bin file, and wanted to extract one file from it,
so i emerged bin2iso and converted it to an iso file (at least so i
hoped)
strangely enough the result was: -01.iso and -02.iso
(the bin is an image of an SVCD)
i wasn't that surprised though and just though `what the hell' and
wanted to
at org.apache.tools.ant.Main.main(Main.java:235)
-- snip - paste ends --
any ant/java experts out there? :)
-bri
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 15:48, Brian Reichholf wrote:
> not that it helps, but i get the exact same error, and of course the
> needed java resources are in /opt (also usin
the java based installer worked fine when running that as root btw :)
hth,
-bri
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 15:48, Brian Reichholf wrote:
> not that it helps, but i get the exact same error, and of course the
> needed java resources are in /opt (also using blackdown java).
>
> i also
not that it helps, but i get the exact same error, and of course the
needed java resources are in /opt (also using blackdown java).
i also posted this problem a while back (may 19th) but got no reply
*sigh*
i tried to solve the problem by just changing to the dir, and reading
the README.SRC.txt i
mmh, you could reboot with a gentoo/knopix/any bootable linux distro and
then chroot/chdir to you're mounted harddrive, then you should be able
to create /proc...
i'm not 100% sure though, but it's well worth a try and sounds pretty
much doable.
HTH,
bri
On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 20:14, Chris Graves
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 18:09, Ben Sparks wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> RPM's...aack!...they's da debil
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQE+cLtHyJBq97+CQrERApj
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 01:19, Michael Jinks wrote:
> Since none (or few) of your dependencies are installed via RPM, RPM
> doesn't know anything about them and will think they're missing.
well, apart from this software i'd like to use - nothing has been
installed via RPM (thank heavans ;)
> Give
*sigh* oh, the joy of rpm's, how annoying :/
i am trying to install some commercial software which unfortunately is
only available as an RPM (to my knowlege - at least i have the rpms...)
strangely enough though after emergeing rpm and executing rpm -ihv
.rpm it tells me that i don't fulful the r
even though this list perhaps shouldn't be used for a discussion like
this i'll gladly add my opinion. though this time, from a "child's"
point of view (since i've almost been through that beeing 18 now).
i must say that i do agree with all of you're opinion.
isn't it generally almost a fact, tha
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 22:05, Ernie Schroder wrote:
> nvidia-*-4191 are still masked, I believe, NVdriver is still correct for
> the standard drivers. Using the 4191 drivers requires other maskes
> packages to be installed such as:
> gcc-3.2.2-r1 [3.2.1-r6]
> glibc-2.3.2 [2.3.1-r2]
> xfree-4.3.0-r
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 21:47, Patrick Marquetecken wrote:
> emerge nvidia-glx
> emerge nvidia-kernel
> echo "NVdriver" >> /etc/modules.autoload
>
> modified the /etc/X11/XF86Config according to the guide.
>
>
> If i reboot there is a message that the NVdriver is not loaded.
> dmesg shows followin
and now as a forward.
-Forwarded Message-
> From: Brian Reichholf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Mario Vukelic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Time is Wrong
> Date: 24 Feb 2003 23:12:45 +0100
>
> On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 22:46, Mario Vukelic wrote
i've just been emerging world and sadly enough can't get past a little
problem with the evil docbook-sgml-utils-0.6.12 package.
when working on the make files it just stops and exits in the relative
subdirectory: docbook-sgml-utils-0.6.12/doc/HTML as it's having problems
building api.html
it woul
On Fri, 1999-12-31 at 21:37, raptor wrote:
> does someone made a upgrade to Gnome 2.2 ?
> Did u have some problems ?!
well, i installed gentoo 1.4-rc2 from "scratch" and never had gnome 2.0
so i started off with gnome 2.2 and so far have experience no problem(s)
with it, then again, i hardly use i
On Sat, 2003-02-22 at 16:55, Collins wrote:
> On Saturday 22 February 2003 07:22 am, Nick Jones wrote:
> > > I have noticed that the "newest version available" is not always the
> > > newest version that actually is available.
> >
> > man emerge
> > look for 'MASKED PACKAGES'
> >
>
> Gentoo develo
Hello there fellow gentoo-users,
i'm fairly new to gentoo (just installed it last weekend) and have been
fiddling with it and the emerge/portage system for some time now.
I have noticed that the "newest version available" is not always the
newest version that actually is available.
Waimea 0.4.0
23 matches
Mail list logo
