Daniel Barkalow schrieb:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Florian Philipp wrote:
>
>> Just a thought: Is it possible to compile a 64bit kernel and use him on
>> the current system? That way you could set up your new native 64bit
>> system in a chroot before overwriting the old one and thus minimize
>> downt
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Florian Philipp wrote:
> Just a thought: Is it possible to compile a 64bit kernel and use him on
> the current system? That way you could set up your new native 64bit
> system in a chroot before overwriting the old one and thus minimize
> downtime to less than 15 minutes.
Bui
On Sep 24, 2007, at 5:03 PM, David Relson wrote:
Just a thought: Is it possible to compile a 64bit kernel and use him
on the current system? That way you could set up your new native
64bit
system in a chroot before overwriting the old one and thus minimize
downtime to less than 15 minutes.
F
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:17:53 +0200
Florian Philipp wrote:
> Neil Bothwick schrieb:
...[snip]...
> > Unpacking a stage 3 tarball on top of a working system is a good
> > way of converting it to a non-working system. It will also
> > overwrite many of your settings in /etc.
> >
> > If you are going
Neil Bothwick schrieb:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:38:36 -0400, David Relson wrote:
>
>> I recall installing Gentoo as being a P.I.T.A, hence take no pleasure
>> in the idea of re-installing. I was hoping for something relatively
>> simple, like
>>changing CHOST and emerging world
>>unpackin
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:38:36 -0400, David Relson wrote:
> I recall installing Gentoo as being a P.I.T.A, hence take no pleasure
> in the idea of re-installing. I was hoping for something relatively
> simple, like
>changing CHOST and emerging world
>unpacking amd64 stage3 tarball on top of
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:16:03 -0400
Mark Shields wrote:
...[snip]...
> Besides what everyone else has already suggested, I would suggest
> backing up everything beforehand, or you can continue using your
> 32-bit environment with your shiny new 64-bit processor, but you will
> not be able to use a
On 9/22/07, David Relson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Now that my old AthlonXP mobo has been replaced by an AMD 64 X2 mobo,
> it's time for upgrading CHOST :->
>
> According to http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/change-chost.xml after a
> couple of changes to /etc/make.conf, i.e.
>
> from:
>U
On Sonntag, 23. September 2007, Marc Redmann wrote:
> > boot from cd
>
> Don't want to start a flame war here, but why should he use reiserfs ???
it was an example. And I am free to choose any fs I want for that. Exept jfs.
Besides reiserfs is a good fs, so no harm done.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ma
> boot from cd
Don't want to start a flame war here, but why should he use reiserfs ??? I
think he can use whatever filesystem he wishes to ...
> mkfs.reiserfs
> start stage3 installation.
brgds, Marc
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Sep 22, 2007, at 5:13 PM, David Relson wrote:
Now that my old AthlonXP mobo has been replaced by an AMD 64 X2 mobo,
it's time for upgrading CHOST :->
According to http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/change-chost.xml after a
couple of changes to /etc/make.conf, i.e.
from:
USE="x86 ..."
On Sep 23, 2007, at 5:47 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Sonntag, 23. September 2007, David Relson wrote:
Now that my old AthlonXP mobo has been replaced by an AMD 64 X2 mobo,
it's time for upgrading CHOST :->
According to http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/change-chost.xml after a
couple of chan
On Sonntag, 23. September 2007, David Relson wrote:
> Now that my old AthlonXP mobo has been replaced by an AMD 64 X2 mobo,
> it's time for upgrading CHOST :->
>
> According to http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/change-chost.xml after a
> couple of changes to /etc/make.conf, i.e.
>
> from:
>USE
Oops, forgot to paste the link:
http://starship.python.net/crew/marduk/blog/entry/1112117933.9,14473
--
Albert W. Hopkins
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 03:43 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> Changing CHOST is valid when you have e.g. an i386 CHOST and want to
> change it
> to i686. It is not an option for going from 32 bit to 64 bit. You need
> to
> reinstall.
Below is what I did a few years ago. YMMV. There may be a
On Sunday 23 September 2007 02:13:46 David Relson wrote:
> Now that my old AthlonXP mobo has been replaced by an AMD 64 X2 mobo,
> it's time for upgrading CHOST :->
>
> According to http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/change-chost.xml after a
> couple of changes to /etc/make.conf, i.e.
>
> from:
>
On 9/13/06, Timothy A. Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/12/06, Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/12/06, darren kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > system. The cpu instructions are forward (but not backward)
> compatible. Thus,
> > > I did not think it necessary for a who
> On 9/12/06, Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/12/06, darren kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > system. The cpu instructions are forward (but not backward)
> compatible. Thus,
> > > I did not think it necessary for a wholesale rebuild of the entire
> system on
> > > the spot. In
On 9/12/06, Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/12/06, darren kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> system. The cpu instructions are forward (but not backward) compatible. Thus,
> I did not think it necessary for a wholesale rebuild of the entire system on
> the spot. Indeed it seems this i
Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
> Hi folks:
>
> In the course of learning gentoo, I managed to create several systems
> using the wrong stage 3 tarballs (or something)
>
> They all have a CHOST setting of i386
>
> Should I change this? What benefits will it bring me, and
Since the new glibc - yes
>
quoth the Richard Fish:
>
> BTW, Darren's answer on this thread seems incorrect to me. Changing
> CHOST is a pretty significant thing to tweak, certainly as significant
> as changing gcc versions, and you really should re-merge *everything*
> to make sure your something doesn't wind up broken.
Hi
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Richard Fish
Sent: Sun 9/10/2006 2:30 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] changing CHOST
On 9/10/06, Timothy A. Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard:
>
> I got this one - thanks,
From: "Jean-Marc Beaune" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] changing CHOST
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 18:39:07 +0200
Hi,
I had to change CHOST also and I can only speak of my experience --
which may be based on the wrong way to do such things, but...
I did:
Chan
Hi,
I had to change CHOST during gcc upgrade.
I did bootstrap.sh
I did emerge -e system
emerge -e world didn't work.
I struggled more than one week to make it work, now I'm reinstalling from scratch.
My advise:
Backup all important data and excpect the fact that you could lost your system.
O
> -Original Message-
> On 9/9/06, Timothy A. Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As I understand it, I change the chost, and then emerge -e system &&
> > emerge -e world
>
> Hmm, same answer I gave you yesterday:
>
>
> /usr/portage/scripts/bootstrap.sh
> emerge -e system
> emerge -e w
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 05:34:55PM -0700, Richard Fish wrote:
>
> Me thinks the mail list bug has struck again. Let me know if you
> don't get this one. ;->
>
Just an FYI - I didn't get your other mail.
festus
--
In all the millions of years dinosaurs roamed this planet, did any of
them feel
On 9/9/06, Timothy A. Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As I understand it, I change the chost, and then emerge -e system &&
emerge -e world
Hmm, same answer I gave you yesterday:
/usr/portage/scripts/bootstrap.sh
emerge -e system
emerge -e world
Me thinks the mail list bug has struck again.
quoth the Timothy A. Holmes:
> Hi folks:
>
> In the course of learning gentoo, I managed to create several systems
> using the wrong stage 3 tarballs (or something)
>
> They all have a CHOST setting of i386
>
> Should I change this? What benefits will it bring me, and
Depends on your type of proce
On Saturday 09 September 2006 18:54, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
> Hi folks:
>
[SNIP]
Replying to another thread and changed the subject like this is referred to as
hijacking a thread. Please don't do that. Instead post a new email to this
list with the new subject. New mail rather than reply...
T
29 matches
Mail list logo
