On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 06:41:08 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>> > WORLD_MERGE="emerge --update --deep --reinstall changed-use
>> > --with-bdeps y --verbose @system @world"
>
>> I guess I've lost track. Is @system not a part of @world or is that
on 04/22/2011 01:09 AM Neil Bothwick wrote the following:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 17:45:14 +0300, Thanasis wrote:
>
>>> % qfile -v Mail
>>> mail-client/mailx-8.1.2.20050715-r3 (/bin/Mail)
>>>
>>> is what I use
>>>
>>>
>> # qfile -v Mail
>> mail-client/nail-12.4 (/usr/bin/Mail)
>
> There you go then
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 08:05:41 +0300, Thanasis wrote:
> > There you go then, it's man page time :)
> http://linux.die.net/man/1/nail
> Do you see anything relevant in the man page?
No, but then I don't need to look at it :)
--
Neil Bothwick
Some cause happiness wherever they go. Others whenev
on 04/22/2011 10:14 AM Neil Bothwick wrote the following:
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 08:05:41 +0300, Thanasis wrote:
>
>>> There you go then, it's man page time :)
>> http://linux.die.net/man/1/nail
>> Do you see anything relevant in the man page?
> No, but then I don't need to look at it :)
>
Yea, I
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:12:39 +0300, Thanasis wrote:
> >>> There you go then, it's man page time :)
> >> http://linux.die.net/man/1/nail
> >> Do you see anything relevant in the man page?
> > No, but then I don't need to look at it :)
> >
> Yea, I don't think it's caused by nail.
Why not?
on 04/22/2011 04:00 PM Neil Bothwick wrote the following:
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:12:39 +0300, Thanasis wrote:
>
> There you go then, it's man page time :)
http://linux.die.net/man/1/nail
Do you see anything relevant in the man page?
>>> No, but then I don't need to look at it
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 18:26:09 +0300, Thanasis wrote:
> > Why not? It's the obvious choice. Have you tried using nail's Mail
> > from the command line to see if it works as you expect?
> I have been using nail because it has the option to set the smtp server
> to use (as an environment variable. If
On Tuesday 10 May 2011 12:28:01 Adam Carter wrote:
> I haven't been able to find clear info on Hyperthreading, but from what I
> can tell it appears that with Hyperthreading On;
> 1. per core performance is slightly reduced
Not in all circumstances...
> 2. you can run two threads per core, but th
>
> In general, for a desktop or server that is doing a lot of different
> things, HT
> is likely to improve performance.
> If the server is dedicated to a single service, there is a distinct chance
> HT
> will lead to decreased performance.
>
> Thanks Joost! That certainly helps.
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 03:10:02PM +0200, JDM wrote:
> Genthinktank,
> How can you determine all the available frambuffer resolutions and colour
> depths on a particular host for vesafb. I normally set this through trial and
> error but there must be a command to determine these?
> JDM
I think "
That's called vbe information.If you have grub2,you can enter the
command mode and type 'vbeinfo',or if you use uvesafb,you will get vbe
info here at /sys/devices/platform/uvesafb.0/graphics/fb0/modes
2011/5/18 Indi :
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 03:10:02PM +0200, JDM wrote:
>> Genthinktank,
>> How c
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:57 AM, JDM wrote:
> Genthinktank,
> How can you determine all the available frambuffer resolutions and colour
> depths on a particular host for vesafb. I normally set this through trial and
> error but there must be a command to determine these?
> JDM
>
>
HTH,
Mark
c2
Apparently, though unproven, at 12:44 on Friday 03 June 2011, Stéphane Guedon
did opine thusly:
> anyone use autofs to manage mounting of nfs on a laptop ?
Is this mounting a share from an nfs server onto a laptop?
> Is it fluent,
> easy to use ?
It's NFS. The words "nfs" and "fluent, easy to
On Friday 03 June 2011 12:55:58 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 12:44 on Friday 03 June 2011, Stéphane
> Guedon
>
> did opine thusly:
> > anyone use autofs to manage mounting of nfs on a laptop ?
>
> Is this mounting a share from an nfs server onto a laptop?
>
> > Is it fl
On 2011-06-03 12:44, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
> anyone use autofs to manage mounting of nfs on a laptop ? Is it fluent, easy
> to
I'm not using any auto-mounters currently but this link may help(?):
http://www.linux-tutorial.info/modules.php?name=MContent&pageid=153
HTH
Best regards
Peter K
On Friday 03 June 2011 13:37:54 Stéphane Guedon wrote:
> On Friday 03 June 2011 12:55:58 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 12:44 on Friday 03 June 2011, Stéphane
> > Guedon
> >
> > did opine thusly:
> > > anyone use autofs to manage mounting of nfs on a laptop ?
> >
> > Is
Apparently, though unproven, at 14:18 on Friday 03 June 2011, Volker Armin
Hemmann did opine thusly:
> On Friday 03 June 2011 13:37:54 Stéphane Guedon wrote:
> > On Friday 03 June 2011 12:55:58 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > Apparently, though unproven, at 12:44 on Friday 03 June 2011, Stéphane
> > >
Am 03.06.2011 14:25, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 14:18 on Friday 03 June 2011, Volker Armin
> Hemmann did opine thusly:
>
>> On Friday 03 June 2011 13:37:54 Stéphane Guedon wrote:
>>> On Friday 03 June 2011 12:55:58 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unprove
Apparently, though unproven, at 14:57 on Friday 03 June 2011, Florian Philipp
did opine thusly:
> Am 03.06.2011 14:25, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 14:18 on Friday 03 June 2011, Volker
> > Armin
> >
> > Hemmann did opine thusly:
> >> On Friday 03 June 2011 13:37:54
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 14:57 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 03.06.2011 14:25, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 14:18 on Friday 03 June 2011, Volker Armin
> > Hemmann did opine thusly:
> >
> >> On Friday 03 June 2011 13:37:54 Stéphane Guedon wrote:
> >>> On Friday 03 J
On Saturday 04 June 2011 02:40:12 William Kenworthy wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 14:57 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote:
> > Am 03.06.2011 14:25, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> > > Apparently, though unproven, at 14:18 on Friday 03 June 2011, Volker
> > > Armin
> > >
> > > Hemmann did opine thusly:
> > >>
On 4 June 2011, at 16:10, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
> ...
> In home network, you share many types of files ! The first I think is DVD
> iso,
> which is huge (too large to go through coda) and not streamable... (but I
> admit it's not the best exemple !)
I'm not sure what coda is, but I "stream" D
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:11 on Saturday 04 June 2011, Stroller did
opine thusly:
> On 4 June 2011, at 16:10, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
> > ...
> > In home network, you share many types of files ! The first I think is DVD
> > iso, which is huge (too large to go through coda) and not streama
JDM wrote:
When switching from runlevel 3 to 1 "init 1" seems to work as I would expect. When I
"init 3" applications hang, I have to keep hitting return to get any progress. Usually I
end up rebooting as X won't start.
Question - should I be using init to change runlevels or is there a bette
Dale wrote:
JDM wrote:
When switching from runlevel 3 to 1 "init 1" seems to work as I
would expect. When I "init 3" applications hang, I have to keep
hitting return to get any progress. Usually I end up rebooting as X
won't start.
Question - should I be using init to change runlevels or is
@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Init
Dale wrote:
> JDM wrote:
>> When switching from runlevel 3 to 1 "init 1" seems to work as I
>> would expect. When I "init 3" applications hang, I have to keep
>> hitting return to get any progress. Usuall
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
> 16:05 root@luciole /boot # mount
> rootfs on / type rootfs (rw)
> /dev/root on / type ext3 (rw,commit=0)
> proc on /proc type proc (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime)
> rc-svcdir on /lib64/rc/init.d type tmpfs
> (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relati
On Thursday 09 June 2011 18:52:29 Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Stéphane Guedon
wrote:
> > 16:05 root@luciole /boot # mount
> > rootfs on / type rootfs (rw)
> > /dev/root on / type ext3 (rw,commit=0)
> > proc on /proc type proc (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime)
> > rc-svc
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
> But it seems every debugfs is disabled in my kernel. But it always mount !
Hmmm, I think the main setting is in "Kernel Hacking" section. In your
.config it is CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=n
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:40 on Thursday 09 June 2011, Stéphane
Guedon did opine thusly:
> 16:05 root@luciole /boot # mount
> rootfs on / type rootfs (rw)
> /dev/root on / type ext3 (rw,commit=0)
> proc on /proc type proc (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime)
> rc-svcdir on /lib64/rc/init.d
* Cahn Roger [110614 09:05]:
> Hi,
>
[..]
> * Bringing up interface eth0
> * dhcp ...
> * Running dhcpcd ...
> dhcpcd[3076]: version 5.2.12 starting
> dhcpcd[3076]: eth0: waiting for carrier
> dhcpcd[3076]: eth0: carrier acquired
> dhcpcd[3076]: eth0: rebinding lease of 192.168.1.20
> dh
On Tuesday 14 June 2011 15:32:22 Cahn Roger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> But the problem is on my desktop with two HD,
> one with XP and the other with Gentoo amd64.
> None of them can connect to internet neither gentoo nor XP.
> I tryed many things (revdep-rebuild, verification in the box, etc.)
> but I wa
On Tuesday 14 Jun 2011 14:32:22 Cahn Roger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yesterday I tried to make a connection between my three PC
> to manage my Epson printer: two with Win XP and Gentoo
> and one with Win7.
> I didn't succeed, but that's not important!
> After reboot of the three machines
> I went back to W
Le 14/06/2011 15:15, Todd Goodman a écrit :
Hi Todd,
Thank you for your quick answer.
> It looks like your DHCP server isn't serving addresses.
Well, it serves adresses for W7, and on the laptop for XP and Gentoo.
The box is configured with fixed adresses.
> If it's your Internet router you mi
Hi Mick,
> What does the router log show?
Euh, how can I get it???
> Can you please share:
> ifconfig eth0
ifconfig eth0
eth0Lien encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1e:8c:4a:44:db
inet adr:169.254.79.43 Bcast:169.254.255.255 Masque:255.255.0.0
adr inet6: fe80::21e:8cff:fe4a:4
> Can you check the network cable and connections to ensure that is actually
> correct?
The cable and connections are well.
Thank you Joost
Roger
on 06/14/2011 05:45 PM Cahn Roger wrote the following:
>> Can you check the network cable and connections to ensure that is actually
>> correct?
>
> The cable and connections are well.
NIC became faulty?
* Cahn Roger [110614 09:31]:
> Le 14/06/2011 15:15, Todd Goodman a écrit :
>
> Hi Todd,
Hi Roger,
>
> Thank you for your quick answer.
You're welcome (for what it's worth.)
>
> > It looks like your DHCP server isn't serving addresses.
>
> Well, it serves adresses for W7, and on the laptop
On Tuesday 14 Jun 2011 15:42:52 Cahn Roger wrote:
> Hi Mick,
>
> > What does the router log show?
>
> Euh, how can I get it???
It depends on your router. Usually routers have at least a GUI control panel
access and one of the pages shows recent attempts to connect and authenticate.
Are your r
> It depends on your router. Usually routers have at least a GUI control panel
> access and one of the pages shows recent attempts to connect and authenticate.
My router hasn't this!
> Are your running some sort of an access control list on the router and have
> not included your MAC address?
> Your DHCP server serves addresses for other hardware OK?
Yes. A PC with W7, my laptop with XP and Gentoo
Both work fine.
The problem is on my desktop with two HD: XP and Gentoo
Both OS can't connect to Internet.
> When you say fixed addresses you mean the DHCP server gives out a
> fixed IP add
>> Try setting an address manually:
>>
>> ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 broadcast 192.168.1.255 netmask 255.255.255.0
>>
>> route add default gw 192.168.1.1 (assuming that this is your router)
>
> I put this in /etc/conf.d/net; is it right?
No. Run them from terminal as root.
Then check.
>>> Try setting an address manually:
>>>
>>> ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 broadcast 192.168.1.255 netmask 255.255.255.0
>>>
>>> route add default gw 192.168.1.1 (assuming that this is your router)
It doesn't work: error locating host target (for route)
Regards
Roger
> # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop
> # ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 up
>
> and post output of
/etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop
* Caching service dependencies ...
/etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 9: broadcast : commande introuvable
/etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 10: netmask : commande introuvable
SIOCADDRT: Le
on 06/14/2011 10:45 PM Cahn Roger wrote the following:
>> # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop
>> # ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 up
>>
>> and post output of
>
> /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop
> * Caching service dependencies ...
> /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 9: broadcast : commande introuvable
> /etc/init.d/
> Run these (in sequence) as root (and post output):
>
> # echo > /etc/conf.d/net
> # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop
> # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 zap
> # ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 up
> # ifconfig
> # ping 192.168.1.1
Bad luck: it fails.
Bureau cahn # echo > /etc/conf.d/net
Bureau cahn # /etc/init.d/net.
on 06/14/2011 11:36 PM Cahn Roger wrote the following:
> Bureau cahn # ping 192.168.1.1
> PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
>>From 192.168.1.20 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable
>>From 192.168.1.20 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable
>>From 192.168.1.20 icmp_seq=4 Dest
> Can you ping 192.168.1.1 from another machine?
Yes, from my laptop with which I'm writing
Portable cahn # ping 192.168.1.1
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=3.86 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=2 ttl=64 time=3.86 ms
64
On Tuesday 14 Jun 2011 18:44:43 Cahn Roger wrote:
> >>> Try setting an address manually:
> >>> ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 broadcast 192.168.1.255 netmask
> >>> 255.255.255.0
> >>>
> >>> route add default gw 192.168.1.1 (assuming that this is your router)
>
> It doesn't work: error locating ho
On Tuesday 14 Jun 2011 20:45:30 Cahn Roger wrote:
> > # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop
> > # ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 up
> >
> > and post output of
>
> /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop
> * Caching service dependencies ...
> /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 9: broadcast : commande introuvable
> /etc/init.d/
on 06/15/2011 12:33 AM Cahn Roger wrote the following:
>> Can you ping 192.168.1.1 from another machine?
>
> Yes, from my laptop with which I'm writing
>
> Portable cahn # ping 192.168.1.1
> PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=3
on 06/15/2011 12:33 AM Cahn Roger wrote the following:
>> Can you ping 192.168.1.1 from another machine?
>
> Yes, from my laptop with which I'm writing
>
> Portable cahn # ping 192.168.1.1
> PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=3
on 06/15/2011 12:47 AM Mick wrote the following:
snip
>
> You need to remove those lines that I asked you to type on the command line
> from the /etc/conf.d/net
He should have already removed them (see the messages in the thread).
/etc/conf.d/net should be empty by now, which means it defaults
* Mick [110614 17:20]:
> On Tuesday 14 Jun 2011 20:45:30 Cahn Roger wrote:
> > > # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop
> > > # ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.20 up
> > >
> > > and post output of
> >
> > /etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop
> > * Caching service dependencies ...
> > /etc/init.d/../conf.d/net: line 9: broad
On Tuesday 14 Jun 2011 23:01:09 Thanasis wrote:
> on 06/15/2011 12:47 AM Mick wrote the following:
> snip
>
> > You need to remove those lines that I asked you to type on the command
> > line from the /etc/conf.d/net
>
> He should have already removed them (see the messages in the thread).
> /etc
on 06/15/2011 01:24 AM Mick wrote the following:
> On Tuesday 14 Jun 2011 23:01:09 Thanasis wrote:
>> on 06/15/2011 12:47 AM Mick wrote the following:
>> snip
>>
>>> You need to remove those lines that I asked you to type on the command
>>> line from the /etc/conf.d/net
>>
>> He should have already
on 06/15/2011 01:31 AM Thanasis wrote the following:
> on 06/15/2011 01:24 AM Mick wrote the following:
>> On Tuesday 14 Jun 2011 23:01:09 Thanasis wrote:
>>> on 06/15/2011 12:47 AM Mick wrote the following:
>>> snip
>>>
You need to remove those lines that I asked you to type on the command
>>
on 06/15/2011 12:57 AM Thanasis wrote the following:
> on 06/15/2011 12:33 AM Cahn Roger wrote the following:
>>> Can you ping 192.168.1.1 from another machine?
>>
>> Yes, from my laptop with which I'm writing
>>
>> Portable cahn # ping 192.168.1.1
>> PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of
>> If you have ethtool installed on the problematic pc, post the output of:
>> ethtool eth0
No, I don't have it.
> f you don't have ethtool, post the output of:
> # dmesg | grep eth
dmesg | grep eth
[2.161822] sky2 :02:00.0: eth0: addr 00:1e:8c:4a:44:db
[ 15.970632] sky2 :02:00.
On Wednesday 15 Jun 2011 09:04:09 Cahn Roger wrote:
> >> If you have ethtool installed on the problematic pc, post the output of:
> >>
> >> ethtool eth0
>
> No, I don't have it.
>
> > f you don't have ethtool, post the output of:
> >
> > # dmesg | grep eth
>
> dmesg | grep eth
> [2.161822
> open a root terminal and type
> ifconfig
> and
> route -n
Here it is:
ifconfig
eth0 Lien encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1e:8c:4a:44:db
inet adr:192.168.1.20 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Masque:255.255.255.0
adr inet6: fe80::21e:8cff:fe4a:44db/64 Scope:Lien
UP BROADCAST RU
On Wednesday 15 Jun 2011 14:55:00 Cahn Roger wrote:
> > open a root terminal and type
> > ifconfig
> > and
> > route -n
>
> Here it is:
>
> ifconfig
> eth0 Lien encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1e:8c:4a:44:db
> inet adr:192.168.1.20 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Masque:255.255.255.0
> a
on 06/15/2011 04:55 PM Cahn Roger wrote the following:
>> open a root terminal and type
>> ifconfig
>> and
>> route -n
>
I wanted to see those when you have booted from a rescue CD.
on 06/15/2011 04:55 PM Cahn Roger wrote the following:
>> open a root terminal and type
>> ifconfig
>> and
>> route -n
>
Try to boot from a rescue or live CD (like ubuntu maybe) and see what
you get.
> When you then run:
> route add default gw 192.168.1.1
> to define a route manually what do you get in response and then what does it
> show:
> route -n
> and what does ip show:
> ip link show dev eth0
Here it is. But the last command not found!
route add default gw 192.168.1.1
Bureau
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Cahn Roger wrote:
> Bureau cahn # ip link show dev eth0
> bash: ip : commande introuvable
It is in package sys-apps/iproute2
>>> open a root terminal and type
>>> ifconfig
>>> and
>>> route -n
>>
> Try to boot from a rescue or live CD (like ubuntu maybe) and see what
> you get.
After the SystemRescueCD was launched, ifconfig
gave for etho a bad adress: fe00::
and route -n gave "kernel IP routing table"
but
Le 15/06/2011 16:52, Paul Hartman a écrit :
> It is in package sys-apps/iproute2
Yes and I haven't it emerged.
But I can't do it because...I have no connection to internet!
Thanks Paul for helping me
Roger
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Cahn Roger wrote:
> Yes and I haven't it emerged.
> But I can't do it because...I have no connection to internet!
I'm sorry. :) I didn't read the entire thread.
If you have another device with Internet connection you can download
the missing files and place it i
on 06/15/2011 05:55 PM Cahn Roger wrote the following:
>
open a root terminal and type
ifconfig
and
route -n
>>>
>> Try to boot from a rescue or live CD (like ubuntu maybe) and see what
>> you get.
>
> After the SystemRescueCD was launched, ifconfig
> gave for etho a bad adres
> If you have another device with Internet connection you can download
> the missing files and place it into your /usr/portage/distfiles
Thank you Paul for the tip :-)
Roger
Now I have emerged iproute2 and I can give also the last answer
> route -n
>
> and what does ip show:
>
> ip link show dev eth0
route add default gw 192.168.1.1
Bureau cahn # route -n
Table de routage IP du noyau
Destination Passerelle Genmask Indic Metric RefUse
Iface
19
on 06/15/2011 06:47 PM Thanasis wrote the following:
> on 06/15/2011 05:55 PM Cahn Roger wrote the following:
>>
> open a root terminal and type
> ifconfig
> and
> route -n
>>> Try to boot from a rescue or live CD (like ubuntu maybe) and see what
>>> you get.
>>
>> After the Sy
On Wednesday 15 Jun 2011 16:53:58 Cahn Roger wrote:
> Now I have emerged iproute2 and I can give also the last answer
>
> > route -n
> >
> > and what does ip show:
> > ip link show dev eth0
>
> route add default gw 192.168.1.1
> Bureau cahn # route -n
> Table de routage IP du noyau
> Destinati
> Once you are inside the SystemRescueCD (has finished booting) try to
> start the network. It should get an IP from the router's dhcp server.
> If it doesn't, then try to assign manually one to eth0, and test.
OK. I make an ifconfig and the adress is: 169.264.240.204
and of course Firefox has no
> Can you please try to ping your router:
> ping -c 3 192.168.1.1
It fails: Destination Host Unreachable
> if this fails try to ping other PCs in your LAN.
I can't get other PCs
If that fails too can you use arping instead:
>
> arping -c 3 -I eth0 192.168.1.1
>
> or the same with the IP a
on 06/15/2011 07:26 PM Cahn Roger wrote the following:
>
>> Once you are inside the SystemRescueCD (has finished booting) try to
>> start the network. It should get an IP from the router's dhcp server.
>> If it doesn't, then try to assign manually one to eth0, and test.
>
> OK. I make an ifconfig
> Assign one manually.
> ifconfig eth0 down 0
> ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.111 up
> ifconfig
> route -n
> ping 192.168.1.1
> arp -a
It works as well with SystemRescueCD as on a terminal
But ping to another PC gives Destination Host Unreachable
on 06/15/2011 08:31 PM Cahn Roger wrote the following:
>> Assign one manually.
>
>> ifconfig eth0 down 0
>> ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.111 up
>> ifconfig
>> route -n
>> ping 192.168.1.1
>> arp -a
>
> It works as well with SystemRescueCD as on a terminal
> But ping to another PC gives Destination Hos
> So try the following and post output:
> # ping -c 3 192.168.1.1 ; arp -a
ping -c 3 192.168.1.1 ; arp -a
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
>From 192.168.1.20 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable
>From 192.168.1.20 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable
>From 192.168.1.20
On Wednesday 15 Jun 2011 17:44:40 Cahn Roger wrote:
> > Can you please try to ping your router:
> >
> > ping -c 3 192.168.1.1
>
> It fails: Destination Host Unreachable
>
> > if this fails try to ping other PCs in your LAN.
>
> I can't get other PCs
>
> If that fails too can you use arping ins
> Can you ping your machine from any other PC on your LAN?
No: Destination Host Unreachable
(from 192.168.1.22 to 192.168.1.20)
> If not please change the ethernet cable.
I did it, it was even a new one!
> This seems s much like a hardware failure
> I can't think of anything else.
I w
On Wednesday 15 Jun 2011 22:49:46 Cahn Roger wrote:
> > Can you ping your machine from any other PC on your LAN?
>
> No: Destination Host Unreachable
> (from 192.168.1.22 to 192.168.1.20)
>
> > If not please change the ethernet cable.
>
> I did it, it was even a new one!
>
> > This seems s
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:14:28 +0100, Mick wrote:
> > > If not please change the ethernet cable.
> >
> > I did it, it was even a new one!
> >
> > > This seems s much like a hardware failure
> > >
> > > I can't think of anything else.
> >
> > I would like this was the key, but... :-(
On Tuesday 14 June 2011 16:30:54 Thanasis wrote:
> on 06/14/2011 05:45 PM Cahn Roger wrote the following:
> >> Can you check the network cable and connections to ensure that is
> >> actually correct?
> >
> > The cable and connections are well.
>
> NIC became faulty?
After reading this thread, I'
On Wednesday 15 June 2011 23:38:01 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:14:28 +0100, Mick wrote:
> > > > If not please change the ethernet cable.
> > >
> > > I did it, it was even a new one!
> > >
> > > > This seems s much like a hardware failure
> > > >
> > > > I can't think of an
Or someone's standing on the cable :-)
Yes, a bad spirit!!!
I resume.
1-The problem occured after I tried to share my Epson printer
between my three PCs: Gentoo+XP (twice) and W7
2-The NIC is included in the motherboard (Asus P5K-E)
3-The cable from the dektop, where the problem exists,
works f
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:50:00 +0200, Cahn Roger wrote:
> 2-The NIC is included in the motherboard (Asus P5K-E)
Can you get hold of a PCI* NIC to try, it will appear as eth1. If it
works the problem is with the motherboard NIC. I'd also check the BIOS to
make sure the pixies haven't disabled the NI
This really sounds like broken hardware and if the
> cable is fine, the NIC is suspect.
I'm afraid you're right!
But, as I just wrote, the NIC is included in the motherboard...
PERHAPS a solution: try a restore from the
external HD where I have saved a week ago with
fsarchiver on SystemRescueCD.
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:06:19 +0200, Cahn Roger wrote:
> This really sounds like broken hardware and if the
> > cable is fine, the NIC is suspect.
>
> I'm afraid you're right!
> But, as I just wrote, the NIC is included in the motherboard...
>
> PERHAPS a solution: try a restore from the
> exter
> Can you get hold of a PCI* NIC to try, it will appear as eth1.
Excuse me, I don't understand what you mean " get hold of a PCI* NIC" :-(
A lspci gives:
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8056 PCI-E
Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 12)
On Thursday 16 June 2011 09:50:00 Cahn Roger wrote:
> Or someone's standing on the cable :-)
>
> Yes, a bad spirit!!!
>
> I resume.
> 1-The problem occured after I tried to share my Epson printer
> between my three PCs: Gentoo+XP (twice) and W7
Is the printer still connected and switched on?
I
On Thursday 16 June 2011 10:28:47 Cahn Roger wrote:
> > Can you get hold of a PCI* NIC to try, it will appear as eth1.
>
> Excuse me, I don't understand what you mean " get hold of a PCI* NIC" :-(
>
> A lspci gives:
>
> 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8056 PCI-E
>
> Based on all the information provided already, there is a very good chance
> that the network card on your mainboard is no longer working correctly.
I'm afraid you're right, because neither Gentoo nor XP work and they're
on two different HD.
> I am, to be honest, hoping that it is caused by in
Apologies if I missed someone already asking these:
1. are the lights on or flashing with a cable plugged in and pinging
something valid?
2. can you ping yourself (both 127.0.0.1 and the nic IP) - cable plugged
in
3. do you have IP tables installed - "iptables -vnL" and check you have
not firewa
On Thursday 16 Jun 2011 09:02:01 Cahn Roger wrote:
> > OK, let's look at this from the router side ... what router make & model
> > do you have?
>
> It's a box through which I get internet, telephone.
> The name is Neuf-Box and given by access supplier SFR.
> It continue to work well on my two oth
on 06/16/2011 10:50 AM Cahn Roger wrote the following:
> Or someone's standing on the cable :-)
>
> Yes, a bad spirit!!!
>
> I resume.
> 1-The problem occured after I tried to share my Epson printer
> between my three PCs: Gentoo+XP (twice) and W7
> 2-The NIC is included in the motherboard (Asu
> Apologies if I missed someone already asking these:
No problem! Thanks to try to help me.
> 1. are the lights on or flashing with a cable plugged in and pinging
> something valid?
No. They are stable
> 2. can you ping yourself (both 127.0.0.1 and the nic IP) - cable plugged
> in
They work bo
> Reset the switch too?
Excuse me Thanasis but I don't understand what you mean ;-(
on 06/16/2011 05:11 PM Cahn Roger wrote the following:
>
>> Reset the switch too?
>
> Excuse me Thanasis but I don't understand what you mean ;-(
>
>
>
Reset, or power-off and power-on the switch/hub.
401 - 500 of 148405 matches
Mail list logo
