Re: [gmx-users] pbc problem

2013-10-29 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/29/13 12:02 PM, shahab shariati wrote: Dear Mark Very thanks for your reply To make this clear, center the trajectory on the water and watch the time evolution in some visualization program. I did your suggestion (center the trajectory on the water). Again, drug molecule is in region

Re: [gmx-users] pbc problem

2013-10-29 Thread Mark Abraham
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 5:02 PM, shahab shariati wrote: > Dear Mark > > Very thanks for your reply > > > To make this clear, center the trajectory on the water and watch the > > time evolution in some visualization program. > > I did your suggestion (center the trajectory on the water). Again, dru

Re: [gmx-users] pbc problem

2013-10-27 Thread Mark Abraham
To make this clear, center the trajectory on the water and watch the time evolution in some visualization program. Mark On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote: > > > On 10/27/13 12:05 PM, shahab shariati wrote: > >> Dear Tsjerk Wassenaar >> >> Very very thanks for your reply. >>

Re: [gmx-users] pbc problem

2013-10-27 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/27/13 12:05 PM, shahab shariati wrote: Dear Tsjerk Wassenaar Very very thanks for your reply. I used trjconv -pbc mol. pbc problem was solved only for lipid molecules. When I see new trajectory by vmd, there are some problesm about drug molecule. https://www.dropbox.com/s/xq4s6az17bu

Re: [gmx-users] pbc problem

2013-10-27 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
Hi Shahab, What about running trjconv -pbc mol with a .tpr as input file? Cheers, Tsjerk On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 3:24 PM, shahab shariati wrote: > Dear Justin > > I attached images related to before (em2.gro) and after equilibration. > > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/yjkyj5ycshvp20u/images.docx

Re: [gmx-users] pbc problem

2013-10-27 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/27/13 8:16 AM, shahab shariati wrote: Dear Justin I want to study translocation of drug molecule in lipid bilayer. My gro file after minimization is em2.gro. After NPT-MD simulation, I obtained npt.gro and 0.xtc files. When I see trajectory by vmd, there are some things abnormal. I g

Re: [gmx-users] pbc problem

2013-10-24 Thread Mark Abraham
As Justin said, there is no actual division between region 1 and 4. Apparently you got the free diffusion you asked for! :-) Mark On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 4:57 PM, shahab shariati wrote: > Dear Mark > > Thank for your reply. > > If I show my system as 4 regions, my system before equilibration is

Re: [gmx-users] pbc problem

2013-10-24 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/24/13 10:57 AM, shahab shariati wrote: Dear Mark Thank for your reply. If I show my system as 4 regions, my system before equilibration is as fallows: region (1): water + drug region (2): top leaflet of bilayer region (3): bottom leaflet of bilayer region (4): water After equilibratio

Re: [gmx-users] pbc problem

2013-10-24 Thread Mark Abraham
On Oct 24, 2013 8:10 AM, "shahab shariati" wrote: > > Dear jkrieger > > I used 2 times trjconv tool: > > 1) trjconv -f npt.xtc -s npt.tpr -n index.ndx -o 2npt.xtc -pbc nojump > > 2) trjconv -f 2npt.xtc -s npt.tpr -n index.ndx -o 3npt.xtc -pbc mol -center > > > Dear Mark > > I selected all lipid at

Re: [gmx-users] pbc problem

2013-10-23 Thread Mark Abraham
Center on a particular lipid? Or head group? Mark On Oct 23, 2013 6:13 PM, "shahab shariati" wrote: > Dear gromacs users > > My system contains DOPC + CHOLESTEROLO + WATER + drug molecules in a > rectangular box. > > I put drug molecule in 2 position: a) drug in the center of bilayer > membrane,

Re: [gmx-users] pbc problem

2013-10-23 Thread jkrieger
I usually use -pbc nojump for my protein simulations and this works every time. > Dear gromacs users > > My system contains DOPC + CHOLESTEROLO + WATER + drug molecules in a > rectangular box. > > I put drug molecule in 2 position: a) drug in the center of bilayer > membrane, b) drug inside water

Re: [gmx-users] PBC problem

2013-06-27 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
Hi Yutian Yang, Yes. That is, if the chain is interacting with itself. If it remains curled up, then it won't be a problem. Cheers, Tsjerk On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Yutian Yang wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a question about PBC. If I have a polymer chain that is longer than > the box l

Re: [gmx-users] pbc problem

2013-04-15 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 4/14/13 11:21 PM, Kieu Thu Nguyen wrote: Thank Justin ! I used the command "editconf -center" and i saw my membrane was in center of the box. I am stupid in that how putting the bilayer in a periodic image (instead between two periodic images as it was). Can you give me some instructions ? M

Re: [gmx-users] pbc problem

2013-04-14 Thread Kieu Thu Nguyen
Thank Justin ! I used the command "editconf -center" and i saw my membrane was in center of the box. I am stupid in that how putting the bilayer in a periodic image (instead between two periodic images as it was). Can you give me some instructions ? Many thanks ! On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:52 PM,

Re: [gmx-users] pbc problem

2013-04-12 Thread Justin Lemkul
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Kieu Thu Nguyen wrote: > Dear All, > > I made a POPC bilayer and carried out embedding a protein into this > membrane. But the fatal error has appeared : > Fatal error: > Something is wrong with your membrane. Max and min z values are 12.342000 > and 0.016000. Mayb

Re: [gmx-users] pbc problem

2007-12-04 Thread Mark Abraham
> hi, all > My protein has 16 subunits. After I use trjconv '-pbc nojump' to remove > the jump in the whole protein, there are no jump to each subunits. > However, when i check pdb file of the first frame, it is shown that the > subunits are not in right position. The area of interface between som

Re: [gmx-users] pbc problem

2007-10-15 Thread Yang Ye
On 10/16/2007 2:31 AM, tangxuan wrote: Dear all, If pbc is full or xyz in mdp file, do i need to use the "trjconv -pbc nojump" to remove the jump when the protein is separate in the box after simulation and I want to calculate the rmsd of the protein? IT is not necessary to use trjconv -pbc be

RE: [gmx-users] PBC problem

2007-05-16 Thread Mu Yuguang (Dr)
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tsjerk Wassenaar Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 4:41 PM To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Subject: Re: [gmx-users] PBC problem Hi Yuguang, Gromacs should automatically fix the box to meet the requirements during an mdrun

Re: [gmx-users] PBC problem

2007-05-16 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
el: +65-63162885 Fax: +65-67913856 http://genome.sbs.ntu.edu.sg/Staff/YGMu/index.php -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tsjerk Wassenaar Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 12:49 PM To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Subject: Re: [gmx-users]

RE: [gmx-users] PBC problem

2007-05-15 Thread Mu Yuguang (Dr)
://genome.sbs.ntu.edu.sg/Staff/YGMu/index.php -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tsjerk Wassenaar Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 12:49 PM To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Subject: Re: [gmx-users] PBC problem Hi Yuguang, > Warning: Triclinic box

Re: [gmx-users] PBC problem

2007-05-15 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
Hi Yuguang, Warning: Triclinic box is too skewed. Box (3x3): Box[0]={ 6.46530e+00, 0.0e+00, 0.0e+00} Box[1]={ 2.14552e+00, 6.10274e+00, 0.0e+00} Box[2]={-2.14464e+00, 3.05200e+00, 5.24664e+00} This is not a rhombic dode