I'm running on Python GAE and also have an average latency under 300ms
(normally in the 250-260 range).
On May 1, 4:53 am, "Brandon Wirtz" wrote:
> Yes that should be 310ms its almost 3am, and I should be sleeping.
>
> From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:google-appengine@googlegrou
Hi Brandon,
So how do you explain that Google serves pages in 50ms when GAE serves
pages at 300ms ? And what to say about Google instant. These guys can
do better than 300ms for sure.
I built my own config on a AWS instance relying on memcache+mysql+php
it would server under 50ms. If you look at
I got <40ms loading this http://demogwtcanvas.appspot.com/test.html
Brandon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
Brandon -
I had the exact same thought at the exact same time.
On May 4, 10:10 am, Brandon Donnelson wrote:
> I got <40ms loading thishttp://demogwtcanvas.appspot.com/test.html
>
> Brandon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group
Dears,
i have a question here, i have web application and want to migrate this web
application to the cloud using GAE
any idea how to do this ?
Note: my application developed using JSF framework.
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Zach wrote:
> I'm running on Python GAE and also have an average la
I'm not sure where you are getting those numbers from, but the network
routing looks like this:
User makes request -> goes to a Google front end -> routed over Google's
network to the serving data center -> request is served
The network layer shouldn't add that much latency, though we really only
ngine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Ikai Lan (Google)
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 11:03 AM
To: Google App Engine
Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Re: Is GAE expected to get faster in the
future?
I'm not sure where you are getting those numbers from, but the network
routing looks like this:
LOW as Google is all Ikai’s fault.
>
>
>
>
> *From:* google-appengine@googlegroups.com [mailto:
> google-appengine@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Ikai Lan (Google)
> *Sent:* Monday, May 02, 2011 11:03 AM
> *To:* Google App Engine
> *Subject:* Re: [google-appengine] Re: Is GAE
Thanks for the interesting comments giving me some benchmarks to
compare with. I've now measured my app with yslow and some of my pages
load in about 200 ms while the slow ones take like 2 or 3 seconds. I
used to run this application on a dedicated physical server running
Linux + MySQL + JBoss +Apa
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Brandon Donnelson
wrote:
> I got <40ms loading this http://demogwtcanvas.appspot.com/test.html
> Brandon
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App Engine" group.
> To post to this group, send email to google-app
Its plain html no rendering. Eclipse uploaded. (mobile at moment)
On May 4, 2011 11:04 AM, "Niklas Rosencrantz" wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Brandon Donnelson
> wrote:
>> I got <40ms loading this http://demogwtcanvas.appspot.com/test.html
>> Brandon
>>
>> --
>> You received this messa
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Brandon Donnelson
wrote:
> Its plain html no rendering. Eclipse uploaded. (mobile at moment)
>
> On May 4, 2011 11:04 AM, "Niklas Rosencrantz" wrote:
>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Brandon Donnelson
>> wrote:
>>> I got <40ms loading this http://demogwtcanvas.a
Heres a demo I used to test GWT init and load a while back. Check chrome
developer tools > network tab for trip times. When I set data to JDO through
RPC the trip is taking around 192ms to 255ms to insert to JDO and return to
tell me.
http://demogaeloadtest.appspot.com/
http://code.google.com/p
We can measure with yslow to see what we get. 50 ms I understand is
good and 200 to 300 ms approvable. Where I need to optimize is where
there are timeouts (where generating zip files) where responses are so
slow as taking seconds. I measured with yslow and an idea, for
optimization, is that we cha
Hey Niklas,
Maybe you could also come up with a simple caching strategy for your
rendered templates. Depending on the site, it might make content
updates easier later on.
Robert
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 07:14, Niklas Rosencrantz wrote:
> We can measure with yslow to see what we get. 50 ms
I want to know more about the G-relativity project :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+un
ngine@googlegroups.com
[mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Brandon Donnelson
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 9:29 AM
To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: RE: [google-appengine] Re: Is GAE expected to get faster in the
future?
I want to know more about the G-relativity pr
Well said. :)
I thinking the other day neutrinos or muons might be a good way to
communicate on. :)
Brandon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubs
18 matches
Mail list logo