What of it?
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Fernando Casas wrote:
> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=no+u
> > Ugh... No, you!
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:23 PM, matan nov wrote:
> >
> >
> >> no u
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:13 PM, msleeper
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=no+u
> Ugh... No, you!
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:23 PM, matan nov wrote:
>
>
>> no u
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:13 PM, msleeper wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Yeah I agree. But also, how about, everyone stop posting irrelevant
>>> bullshit on the
And there was me thinking that this topic was going to come to a friendly
end.
Good Job... you ruined it.
2009/4/14 1nsane <1nsane...@gmail.com>
> Ugh... No, you!
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:23 PM, matan nov wrote:
>
> > no u
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:13 PM, msleeper
> wrote:
> >
> >
Ugh... No, you!
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:23 PM, matan nov wrote:
> no u
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:13 PM, msleeper wrote:
>
> > Yeah I agree. But also, how about, everyone stop posting irrelevant
> > bullshit on the mailing list, and I will stop badgering you for posting
> > irrelevant bull
:facepalm:
f0rkz
On Apr 14, 2009, at 3:23 PM, matan nov wrote:
> no u
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:13 PM, msleeper
> wrote:
>
>> Yeah I agree. But also, how about, everyone stop posting irrelevant
>> bullshit on the mailing list, and I will stop badgering you for
>> posting
>> irrelevant b
no u
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:13 PM, msleeper wrote:
> Yeah I agree. But also, how about, everyone stop posting irrelevant
> bullshit on the mailing list, and I will stop badgering you for posting
> irrelevant bullshit on the mailing list.
>
>
> On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 08:08 -0400, f0rkz wrote:
>
Yeah I agree. But also, how about, everyone stop posting irrelevant
bullshit on the mailing list, and I will stop badgering you for posting
irrelevant bullshit on the mailing list.
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 08:08 -0400, f0rkz wrote:
> No worries mate. I know I am guilty of drunk calls/posts so I kno
4, 2009 8:36:28 AM
> Subject: Re: [hlds] "Writing the code was typically less than half the
> problem."
>
> *DOH!*
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:55 AM, matan nov wrote:
>
> > Oh shit, I sent that to the wrong mailing list.Ignore please.
> >
>
Parents should learn to password their computers while unsupervised kids are
present
From: Jeff Wozniak
To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 8:36:28 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds] "Writing the code was typically less
*DOH!*
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:55 AM, matan nov wrote:
> Oh shit, I sent that to the wrong mailing list.Ignore please.
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:55 PM, matan nov wrote:
>
> > All niggers must hang.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:08 PM, f0rkz wrote:
> >
> >> No worries mate. I kno
All niggers must hang.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:08 PM, f0rkz wrote:
> No worries mate. I know I am guilty of drunk calls/posts so I know
> where you are coming from.
>
> My beef is that I just feel like people try to back others into
> corners and beat them up like bullies. This way they buy
Oh shit, I sent that to the wrong mailing list.Ignore please.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:55 PM, matan nov wrote:
> All niggers must hang.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:08 PM, f0rkz wrote:
>
>> No worries mate. I know I am guilty of drunk calls/posts so I know
>> where you are coming from.
>>
No worries mate. I know I am guilty of drunk calls/posts so I know
where you are coming from.
My beef is that I just feel like people try to back others into
corners and beat them up like bullies. This way they buy their way
into the srcds mailing list cool club and aren't flamed themselve
I see you are using GMail. Kindly install the Mail Goggles labs app.
2009/4/14 Patrick Shelley
> Umm, ok, umm
>
> Apologies for my emails on this.
>
> It was a 4 day holiday over here in UK and i got badly wrecked on each day.
>
> A proper, sober reply to msleepers email would have been somethin
Umm, ok, umm
Apologies for my emails on this.
It was a 4 day holiday over here in UK and i got badly wrecked on each day.
A proper, sober reply to msleepers email would have been something like:
"you'll have to ask Philip Bembridge why he thought a hlmappers email would
be relevant to hlds as h
eeek run away... they dont offer remote desktop on their dedicated servers.
Not to mention vent, team speak or a website.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 9:01 PM, f0rkz wrote:
> The face of myinternetservices.com!
>
> f0rkz
>
> On Apr 13, 2009, at 9:03 PM, Patrick Shelley wrote:
>
> > I reserve the righ
The face of myinternetservices.com!
f0rkz
On Apr 13, 2009, at 9:03 PM, Patrick Shelley wrote:
> I reserve the right to say wtf i like to msleeper - and FYI Mr
> Freud, he is
> dumb, very dumb.
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 1:46 AM, Saul Rennison >wrote:
>
>> msleeper's "relevence" question was
chives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
____________
From: Jake Skenna
To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 10:12:19 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] "Writing the code was typically less than half the p
Cat fight
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Patrick Shelley wrote:
> I reserve the right to say wtf i like to msleeper - and FYI Mr Freud, he is
> dumb, very dumb.
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 1:46 AM, Saul Rennison >wrote:
>
> > msleeper's "relevence" question was rhetorical-- the irony is that
>
I reserve the right to say wtf i like to msleeper - and FYI Mr Freud, he is
dumb, very dumb.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 1:46 AM, Saul Rennison wrote:
> msleeper's "relevence" question was rhetorical-- the irony is that
> you're calling him dumb when you didn't see the 5th grade literacy
> devices us
msleeper's "relevence" question was rhetorical-- the irony is that
you're calling him dumb when you didn't see the 5th grade literacy
devices used in his email.
On 13 Apr 2009, at 23:11, Patrick Shelley wrote:
> Im blaming Philip Bembridge!
> ___
>
Im blaming Philip Bembridge!
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
-------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:32:58 -0400
> From: msleeper
> Subject: Re: [hlds] "Writing the code was typically less than half the
>problem."
> To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
>
Apr 2009 17:32:58 -0400
> Subject: Re: [hlds] "Writing the code was typically less than halfthe
> problem."
>
> Normally you'd be right but in this case, no. The article has nothing at
> all to do with server administration.
>
> * The first para
And if you hadn't made a reply, it wouldnt currently be cluttering our
mailboxes
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 2:32 PM, msleeper wrote:
> Normally you'd be right but in this case, no. The article has nothing at
> all to do with server administration.
>
> * The first paragraph is describing how befor
Normally you'd be right but in this case, no. The article has nothing at
all to do with server administration.
* The first paragraph is describing how before HL2, Valve's design
process was not close-knit like they are now.
* The second paragraph is describing how they fixed it when the
develope
I dont reward msleeper in any way.
Like i said, if he had read the entire email, he would have answered his own
question.
My money is on that he *did* read the entire email, and knows full well why
it ended up on hlds, and that his "relevant to server administration"
comment was just to wind othe
CLEVER
f0rkz
On Apr 13, 2009, at 5:13 PM, Patrick Shelley wrote:
> Fork off
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:11 PM, f0rkz wrote:
>
>> Inb4internet bully.
>>
>> Grow up.
>>
>> f0rkz
>>
>>
>> On Apr 13, 2009, at 5:07 PM, Patrick Shelley wrote:
>>
>>> Its a pity you dont care enough about being a co
Fork off
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:11 PM, f0rkz wrote:
> Inb4internet bully.
>
> Grow up.
>
> f0rkz
>
>
> On Apr 13, 2009, at 5:07 PM, Patrick Shelley wrote:
>
> > Its a pity you dont care enough about being a complete tosser.
> >
> > Like i said, twat, if you'd have read the whole email you'd
And this is why we can't have nice things.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 3:59 PM, msleeper wrote:
> If I cared about the hlmappers list I'd subscribe there.
>
>
> On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 21:47 +0100, Patrick Shelley wrote:
> > Get a grip you twat - read the whole fucking email and you would have
> found
Inb4internet bully.
Grow up.
f0rkz
On Apr 13, 2009, at 5:07 PM, Patrick Shelley wrote:
> Its a pity you dont care enough about being a complete tosser.
>
> Like i said, twat, if you'd have read the whole email you'd have
> answered
> your own fucking question.
>
> Nice to see your still plum
Its a pity you dont care enough about being a complete tosser.
Like i said, twat, if you'd have read the whole email you'd have answered
your own fucking question.
Nice to see your still plumbing the depths of your own stupidity. Looks like
your still coming up with fresh ways to show everyone wh
If I cared about the hlmappers list I'd subscribe there.
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 21:47 +0100, Patrick Shelley wrote:
> Get a grip you twat - read the whole fucking email and you would have found
> out why it ended up on the hlds.
>
> This is hlmappers email and someone decided to post it on hlds -
Get a grip you twat - read the whole fucking email and you would have found
out why it ended up on the hlds.
This is hlmappers email and someone decided to post it on hlds - but if
you'd have spared 1 ounze of common sense you'd have read what happened.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 8:15 PM, msleeper
Cool article but this has what to do with server administration?
On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 09:47 +0100, Philip Bembridge wrote:
> Interesting post on the HLmappers mailing list :-)
>
> Phil
>
> 2009/4/5 Nathan Voge
>
> >
> > I just thought I would throw up this quote from a Gamasutra article on T
35 matches
Mail list logo
