Hello everybody!
Today we gladly announce the final
version of Enblend/Enfuse version 4.0. We have
put a tar-ball of it at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/enblend/files/
For convenience we also compiled binary archives
for the operating systems Windows (Thomas Modes)
and MacOSX (I
Hi Bruno,
> Some ideas:
>
> The tab bar eats up some screenspace, but actually it can be used to
> free up some more, the 'Projection' box can be its own tab, and the
> 'Blend mode' and 'EV' functions can move to the 'Preview' tab (not
> sure about this name though).
>
> The Centre, Fit, Autocrop
I just noticed something tonight while doing some test stitches. I
have a very large stitch that I'm doing test stitches of various crops
from that large stitch to see the results so I can adjust control
points, settings for enfuse/enblend, etc. I'm getting different
results from "Fused and blend
Agreed. Panoramic photos in themselves are not patentable as they
have been around for some time.
I don't understand your second statement.
With regards to iPiX and Photosphere, that was interesting. iPiX did
sue photographers then were sued and settled with Pictosphere. iPiX
then licensed Pic
Panoramic photos have been around for some time. We've got a photo here in a
furniture store of downtown that was produced in 1890.
Panoramic photos would not have a patent, or if it did would be defeated by
prior art.
A methodology might be considered patentable, but then you would have to p
The Mac version of Hugin does include the auto control point
generators in the download. I believe you are correct that China
technically does have copyright laws but they are rarely enforced as
you note. For all practical purposes, there is no patent or copyright
protection in China.
I am not s
I have the feeling you're not into discussing hugin at all.
DaveN schrieb am 18.12.09 02:08:
> Copyright is largely ignored in China and other places so can people
> in those places copy your images or repackage Hugin?
>
> Bruno: Where is the other place to discuss Hugin where I can find
> answe
An interesting post.
In the US, fansubs, ie people subbing japanese anime and other foriegn movies
traditionally have been ignored in part because the content had not yet been
copyrighted in the US. Recently international trade agreements have changed
that. Now anime produced in Japan is copyr
Copyright is largely ignored in China and other places so can people
in those places copy your images or repackage Hugin?
Bruno: Where is the other place to discuss Hugin where I can find
answers?
On Dec 17, 7:31 am, "tennevin.yves" wrote:
> Patents hold no ground in Europe.
> The Berne convent
On Wed 16-Dec-2009 at 22:34 -0800, T. Modes wrote:
>
>Thanks for feedback. I uploaded an updated version of the patch which
>uses tabs to the patch tracker
>(https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2914002&group_id=77506&atid=550443).
>Please give it a try.
Great, I put some screenshots
Hi Harry,
Thanks for the update.
I've never found the auto control point generators particularly useful
for fisheye images, but the align_image_stack would help quite a bit
setting up stacks of bracketed exposures for HDR, so I'm keen to give
it a try.
Please let me know when something becomes a
Hi Brian,
How far off is the SDK for building hugin from trunk? I suppose enblend does
not need to be built as described here [1] as there is a released (or RC)
4.0 now, right?
[1] http://wiki.panotools.org/Build_Hugin_for_Windows_with_SDK
Cheers
2009/12/13 brian_ims
>
> I am not a C/C+ prog
Patents hold no ground in Europe.
The Berne convention can still be applied, what ever the licence you
choose for your image.
And to DaveN comment, I ain't infringing any patent while located in
Europe, so the moralistic opinion is bogus, but copyright laws can still
be applied in Europe.
--
Yves
I think you'll find the answers to your questions in some other forum.
--
Bruno
On Dec 17, 3:04 pm, DaveN wrote:
> Sure the IP rights are separate but that was not the question.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic softwa
Sure the IP rights are separate but that was not the question. If you
create an image infringing on a patent, can you in all honesty be
outraged if someone infringes on your rights to your image?
On Dec 17, 12:39 am, ArAgost wrote:
> IANAL and I'm no expert on patents, but note that whatever are
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 14:32, Ron Decline wrote:
> Still, I suggest that Hugin put the % sign next to the input box, also a
> drop-down menu (from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) in increments of 10) would be
> nice
I think that the quality is not measured in %, it's just a unitless measure.
Cheers,
Thanks guys, 100% is what I will use.
Still, I suggest that Hugin put the % sign next to the input box, also a
drop-down menu (from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) in increments of 10) would be nice
On Dec 17, 2009, at 2:50 AM, hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com wrote:
> Harry van der Wolf Dec 16 04:39PM +
IANAL and I'm no expert on patents, but note that whatever are the
issues with the software, the intellectual property of the image is
completely separate.
On 17 Dic, 06:30, DaveN wrote:
> The best control point generators out there are SIFT based (or the
> software company doesn't tell you what
18 matches
Mail list logo
