Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: A job for Hugin mosaic-mode - hieroglyphs

2011-05-30 Thread Emad ud din Btt
Yes, I am talking about using a telephoto lens and shooting a linear panorama from different spots. I am talking about using telephoto compression to make surfaces flat. For example there are objects physically not on one same plane. So thats not a flat surface to shoot. A telephoto lens will mak

Re: [hugin-ptx] 2011.0: To release or not to release, that's the question

2011-05-30 Thread Yuval Levy
On May 30, 2011 07:36:50 PM Bruno Postle wrote: > On Sun 29-May-2011 at 19:07 +0200, Harry van der Wolf wrote: > >Last Friday I released a version for a selected set of users all on 10.5 > >to see whether Thomas' last idea might fix the stitching error. > > Another option is just to change Hugin t

Re: [hugin-ptx] DEVS/IMPORTANT: need consensus on a new rule of what can/can't be done to the code base

2011-05-30 Thread Yuval Levy
On May 30, 2011 07:36:23 PM Bruno Postle wrote: > On Sat 28-May-2011 at 13:40 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: > >Release branches are string-frozen. Strings for translation are updated > >prior to branching and in principle no new string shall be added to a > >release branch. > > Agreed. This also appl

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: DEVS/IMPORTANT: need consensus on a new rule of what can/can't be done to the code base

2011-05-30 Thread Yuval Levy
On May 30, 2011 11:45:19 AM T. Modes wrote: > > 1) STRINGS > > > > Release branches are string-frozen. > > Agreed. > > > 2) API/HEADERS > > > > Release branches are header-frozen to prevent a change in signature and > > potential breakage of the scripting wrapper API. An exception may be > >

Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin 2011.0.0 released

2011-05-30 Thread Bruno Postle
On Sun 29-May-2011 at 15:54 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: Watch http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx for the announcements of binary releases. If you don't see a binary for your platform it has most likely not been produced yet. There are fedora f14/f15/f16 packages for 32 and 64 bit here: ht

Re: [hugin-ptx] transform-pano and exposure stacks?

2011-05-30 Thread Bruno Postle
On Mon 30-May-2011 at 21:10 +0200, Milan Knížek wrote: is transform-pano (or rather Panotools::Script) capable of handling pto files with input images organised to exposure stacks? Thanks, yes it was broken, transform-pano predates the linked stacks feature in Hugin. It is now fixed in SVN a

Re: [hugin-ptx] 2011.0: To release or not to release, that's the question

2011-05-30 Thread Bruno Postle
On Sun 29-May-2011 at 19:07 +0200, Harry van der Wolf wrote: Last Friday I released a version for a selected set of users all on 10.5 to see whether Thomas' last idea might fix the stitching error. Another option is just to change Hugin to only ever send stitching jobs to the Batch Processor

Re: [hugin-ptx] DEVS/IMPORTANT: need consensus on a new rule of what can/can't be done to the code base

2011-05-30 Thread Bruno Postle
On Sat 28-May-2011 at 13:40 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: Release branches are string-frozen. Strings for translation are updated prior to branching and in principle no new string shall be added to a release branch. Agreed. This also applies to changes to existing strings (though it is sometimes

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: About autopanog and autopano-sift packages for Debian

2011-05-30 Thread Gnome Nomad
Yuval Levy wrote: On May 30, 2011 05:50:05 AM Gnome Nomad wrote: Autopanog > Advanced tab > Alignment, turn on Automatic pre-aligning of images, that ungreys the option to generate horizon lines. thanks for the instructions. `man autopano` describes an option: --generate-horizon

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2011.0.0 released

2011-05-30 Thread Travis Good
Would love a Windows 64 bit installer for this release if anyone has a link :) Thanks kindly. On May 30, 9:13 am, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: > I made packages for OpenSuSE 11.3 and 11.4. They can be downloaded > from my build service repository: > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=hug

[hugin-ptx] transform-pano and exposure stacks?

2011-05-30 Thread Milan Knížek
Hello list! is transform-pano (or rather Panotools::Script) capable of handling pto files with input images organised to exposure stacks? When I run "transform-pano 0 90 90 in.pto out.pto", then only the first image in each stack is rotated properly, while the others get the same position (yaw, p

[hugin-ptx] Re: 2011.0: To release or not to release, that's the question

2011-05-30 Thread Battle
Yes Harry. I downloaded and used Hugin.app20110528.dmg I got the clean test message window. Clicked OK, and Hugin did its thing correctly. Seems to work fine. Battle On May 30, 12:43 pm, Harry van der Wolf wrote: > Hi Battle, > > 2011/5/30 Battle > > > Harry, > > This file works on 10.5.8 on a

[hugin-ptx] Re: Generate control point lines

2011-05-30 Thread kfj
On 30 Mai, 19:15, kfj <_...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I built mine from source on Ubuntu. Also produces a memory fault when > I use it with the --generate-horizon option, but works fine otherwise. Actually, the problem seems to be the --align already (which you mist use to use --generate-horizon): k

Re: [hugin-ptx] 2011.0: To release or not to release, that's the question

2011-05-30 Thread phartz...@gmail.com
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Harry van der Wolf wrote: > The zip file I pointed you to in second instance is the test version for the > stitching error. I shall obtain that file a bit later, try it and report. I am using 10.5.4. Steve -- You received this message because you are sub

[hugin-ptx] Re: Generate control point lines

2011-05-30 Thread kfj
On 30 Mai, 15:15, Yuval Levy wrote: > On May 27, 2011 08:29:37 am Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho (Cartola) wrote: > > > Have you used the command line autopano-sift-c with the option to do that? > > I tried but it got "segmentation fault" in both Windows and FreeBSD. Maybe > > it works on linux. > >

[hugin-ptx] Re: DEVS/IMPORTANT: need consensus on a new rule of what can/can't be done to the code base

2011-05-30 Thread kfj
On 30 Mai, 17:45, "T. Modes" wrote: > > 2) API/HEADERS > > > Release branches are header-frozen to prevent a change in signature and > > potential breakage of the scripting wrapper API.  An exception may be > > requested if the underlying motive is important enough.  The request must > > receiv

[hugin-ptx] Re: small artifacts in exposure fusions with enfuse

2011-05-30 Thread kfj
On 30 Mai, 17:58, Emad ud din Btt wrote: > kay plz try your project without any masks? than compare both and share. There is no project, hence no masks. enfuse was used from the command line, as I wrote in the bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/enblend/+bug/787387 Kay -- You received th

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: 2011.0: To release or not to release, that's the question

2011-05-30 Thread Harry van der Wolf
Hi Battle, 2011/5/30 Battle > Harry, > This file works on 10.5.8 on a MacBook Pro. > I ran the pto both direct from hugin and from the PTGUIbatch on two > pto files. One was a single image with perspective rectification > only. The other was a 270MP final stitch output. > Both correctly direct

[hugin-ptx] Re: A job for Hugin mosaic-mode - hieroglyphs

2011-05-30 Thread kfj
On 30 Mai, 17:53, Emad ud din Btt wrote: > Kay, Can we utilize dof compression as well? Like you are looking for flat > surfaces and dof of a telephoto lens also compresses depth. Objects > physically apart form each other start looking like on one same plan.  So > what about mosaicing with a te

Re: [hugin-ptx] 2011.0: To release or not to release, that's the question

2011-05-30 Thread Harry van der Wolf
Hi Steve, 2011/5/30 phartz...@gmail.com > On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Harry van der Wolf > wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > > > 2011/5/29 phartz...@gmail.com > >> > >> On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Harry van der Wolf > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Last Friday I released a version for a selected set

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: small artifacts in exposure fusions with enfuse

2011-05-30 Thread Emad ud din Btt
kay plz try your project without any masks? than compare both and share. On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:40 PM, kfj <_...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On 25 Mai, 19:08, "Kay F. Jahnke" <_...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > I have a problem with enfuse here (Kubuntu 11.4, bleeding edge enfuse) > which I

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: A job for Hugin mosaic-mode - hieroglyphs

2011-05-30 Thread Emad ud din Btt
Kay, Can we utilize dof compression as well? Like you are looking for flat surfaces and dof of a telephoto lens also compresses depth. Objects physically apart form each other start looking like on one same plan. So what about mosaicing with a telephoto lens. Will it have effect or not? What do yo

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: 2011.0: To release or not to release, that's the question

2011-05-30 Thread phartz...@gmail.com
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Battle wrote: > Harry, > This file works on 10.5.8 on a MacBook Pro. > I ran the pto both direct from hugin and from the PTGUIbatch on two > pto files.  One was a single image with perspective rectification > only.  The other was a 270MP final stitch output. > Bo

[hugin-ptx] Re: DEVS/IMPORTANT: need consensus on a new rule of what can/can't be done to the code base

2011-05-30 Thread T. Modes
> 1) STRINGS > > Release branches are string-frozen.   Agreed. > > 2) API/HEADERS > > Release branches are header-frozen to prevent a change in signature and > potential breakage of the scripting wrapper API.  An exception may be > requested if the underlying motive is important enough.  The requ

[hugin-ptx] Re: 2011.0: To release or not to release, that's the question

2011-05-30 Thread Battle
Harry, This file works on 10.5.8 on a MacBook Pro. I ran the pto both direct from hugin and from the PTGUIbatch on two pto files. One was a single image with perspective rectification only. The other was a 270MP final stitch output. Both correctly directly from Hugin. Battle On May 29, 3:37 pm,

Re: [hugin-ptx] DEVS/IMPORTANT: need consensus on a new rule of what can/can't be done to the code base

2011-05-30 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
On 28 May 2011 19:40, Yuval Levy wrote: > Hello Hugin Developers, > > The addition of Python scripting functionality calls for a little bit more > coordination to prevent API changes that may break scripting functionality. > > Moreover it is an opportunity to formalize a rule that has already been

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: RE calibrate_lens_gui

2011-05-30 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
> > Removing the code from the current default branch will not be a complete loss > - those interested in this code can still find it by checking out older > revisions; and the code can be revived if necessary.  IIRC Tom had plans for > the new lens model.  I would suggest talking with him before r

Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin 2011.0.0 released

2011-05-30 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
I made packages for OpenSuSE 11.3 and 11.4. They can be downloaded from my build service repository: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=hugin&project=home%3Astativ However the x86_64 package for OpenSuSE 11.4 seems to freeze on Stitcher3.cpp for a few hours. If the package doesn't bu

Re: [hugin-ptx] Generate control point lines

2011-05-30 Thread Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho (Cartola)
You could download http://sourceforge.net/projects/hugin/files/autopano-sift-C/autopano-sift-C-2.5.1/ and compile it. 2011/5/30 Yuval Levy > On May 27, 2011 08:29:37 am Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho (Cartola) wrote: > > Have you used the command line autopano-sift-c with the option to do > that?

Re: [hugin-ptx] Generate control point lines

2011-05-30 Thread Yuval Levy
On May 27, 2011 08:29:37 am Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho (Cartola) wrote: > Have you used the command line autopano-sift-c with the option to do that? > I tried but it got "segmentation fault" in both Windows and FreeBSD. Maybe > it works on linux. autopano-sift-c is not distributed by Ubuntu, only

Re: [hugin-ptx] Recent CMake build changes changes

2011-05-30 Thread Yuval Levy
On May 28, 2011 04:27:22 am Kornel Benko wrote: > > DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH is not a supported variable name at /usr/bin/dpkg- > > architecture line 214. fixed. > > While we are at it, there I also see twice the warning: > > > > -- WARNING: you are using the obsolete 'PKGCONFIG' macro use > > FindPk

Re: [hugin-ptx] A job for Hugin mosaic-mode - hieroglyphs

2011-05-30 Thread Yuval Levy
On May 30, 2011 03:33:49 AM Oskar Sander wrote: > I havent been able to gather > any new material for mosaicing myself recently... +1 :( signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: About autopanog and autopano-sift packages for Debian

2011-05-30 Thread Yuval Levy
On May 30, 2011 05:50:05 AM Gnome Nomad wrote: > Autopanog > Advanced tab > Alignment, turn on Automatic pre-aligning of > images, that ungreys the option to generate horizon lines. thanks for the instructions. > > `man autopano` describes an option: > > --generate-horizon > > > >

Re: [hugin-ptx] 2011.0: To release or not to release, that's the question

2011-05-30 Thread phartz...@gmail.com
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Harry van der Wolf wrote: > Hi Steve, > > 2011/5/29 phartz...@gmail.com >> >> On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Harry van der Wolf >> wrote: >> >> > Last Friday I released a version for a selected set of users all on 10.5 >> > to >> > see whether Thomas' last idea

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: About autopanog and autopano-sift packages for Debian

2011-05-30 Thread Gnome Nomad
Yuval Levy wrote: On May 28, 2011 12:11:05 PM kfj wrote: On 28 Mai, 08:39, Gnome Nomad wrote: I found them atwww.debian-multimedia.org. They're binary only. Debian dropped them from Sid, so look in the Stable (Squeeze) or Oldstable (Lenny) package collections there. The links that Google brin

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: About autopanog and autopano-sift packages for Debian

2011-05-30 Thread Gnome Nomad
kfj wrote: On 28 Mai, 08:39, Gnome Nomad wrote: I found them atwww.debian-multimedia.org. They're binary only. Debian dropped them from Sid, so look in the Stable (Squeeze) or Oldstable (Lenny) package collections there. The links that Google brings up for autopano-sift go to a file not found

[hugin-ptx] Re: A job for Hugin mosaic-mode - hieroglyphs

2011-05-30 Thread kfj
On 30 Mai, 09:33, Oskar Sander wrote: > A recent mosaic of hidden rooms in the great pyramid, see link below. > However they should have used Hugin, lousy blending! > > http://news.discovery.com/archaeology/zooms/pyramids-hieroglyphs-robo... Lousy blending indeed, but the take was quite probabl

[hugin-ptx] Re: small artifacts in exposure fusions with enfuse

2011-05-30 Thread kfj
On 25 Mai, 19:08, "Kay F. Jahnke" <_...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi all! > > I have a problem with enfuse here (Kubuntu 11.4, bleeding edge enfuse) which > I only noticed recently, >... > https://bugs.launchpad.net/enblend/+bug/787387 So that was five days ago. No replies so far (at least none dealing

[hugin-ptx] A job for Hugin mosaic-mode - hieroglyphs

2011-05-30 Thread Oskar Sander
A recent mosaic of hidden rooms in the great pyramid, see link below. However they should have used Hugin, lousy blending! http://news.discovery.com/archaeology/zooms/pyramids-hieroglyphs-robot-mystery-110526.html This is a bit OT I know, but it would be interesting to hear from some more mosaic-