On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:09:17PM +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Axel already mentioned that you should be presented with i3-config-wizard on
> your first start of i3, which will generate an i3 config based on keyboard
> codes instead of keyboard symbols. So, in that config file
Hi Daniel,
Quoting Daniel Bolgheroni (2012-04-26 21:55:01)
> Yes, I know the concept. But, unfortunately and at least in my case, ';'
> is not on the homerow.
Axel already mentioned that you should be presented with i3-config-wizard on
your first start of i3, which will generate an i3 config based
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 05:48:11PM +0200, Axel Wagner wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Yes, hjk; is on the homerow, that is, you don't have to take your hands of
> your keyboard, while typing, to navigate your windows.
Yes, I know the concept. But, unfortunately and at least in my case, ';'
is not on the
Hi Daniel,
Excerpts from Daniel Bolgheroni's message of 2012-04-26 16:52:01 +0200:
> Are there any reasons to shift "right" the classic vi 'hjkl' directions
> commands to 'hjk;'?
Yes, hjk; is on the homerow, that is, you don't have to take your hands of
your keyboard, while typing, to navigate y
Hi i3-discuss@,
I didn't find a way to search in the archives, so I'll ask.
Are there any reasons to shift "right" the classic vi 'hjkl' directions
commands to 'hjk;'?
There is a historic reason for using 'hjkl':
http://www.catonmat.net/blog/why-vim-uses-hjkl-as-arrow-keys/
http://news.ycombin
