On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 12:56:14 -0700, Alan Young wrote:
>
>It's just like a regexp or unix shell command, precede the special
>character with a escape backslash.
>
>find r'a\'\"b'
>
Nope:
SDSF EDITMAINTRCX (JOB06470) JESMSGLG Parameter not
recognized
Command ===> find
That worked. Now I have the time formatted very nicely.
Thank you!
Janet
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 18:07:11 -0700, Alan Young wrote:
>Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>> On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 12:56:14 -0700, Alan Young wrote:
>>
>>> It's just like a regexp or unix shell command, precede the special
>>> character with a escape backslash.
>>>
>>> find r'a\'\"b'
>>>
>>>
>> Nope:
>>
>> SDSF
Which "that"?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Janet Graff
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 5:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMFxTME field
That worked. Now I have the time formatted very
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 12:56:14 -0700, Alan Young wrote:
It's just like a regexp or unix shell command, precede the special
character with a escape backslash.
find r'a\'\"b'
Nope:
SDSF EDITMAINTRCX (JOB06470) JESMSGLG Parameter not
Typically a CPC object in HMC is named P0012345 (serial number).
It is unique, but not very convenient for multi-CPC display.
Q: can I rename it? I would like to use names like FRANK or JENNY.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie
I have been informed that no cross reference list exists at this time.
I searched the SECINT list by FMID instead and then used the results to perform
crosszone queries.
Thanks to all that responded.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Richards, Robert B.
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016
Both my current and previous customers used CPCs "nicknames" on HMC.
It was already setup like that in both cases, so don't ask me how to do it
:)
Regards,
---
*Lucas
At 12:04 -0700 on 01/06/2016, Paul Gilmartin wrote about Sort for not there?:
Well, the Pigeonhole Principle guarantees that if the data don't exceed
65,535 lines a suitable value must exist. But how to find it?
I might take this to IBM-MAIN; someone is apt to jump in with a DFSORT/ICETOOL
I have done such a change on two z10s with good results. The third time
did not go so well. For some reason, the secondary cpc did not change.
Everything looked ok until we did a POR, then it would not come up. We
had to restore the CPC.
I don't know what went wrong, but after that, we no
W dniu 2016-01-07 o 13:19, Tony Thigpen pisze:
I have done such a change on two z10s with good results. The third
time did not go so well. For some reason, the secondary cpc did not
change. Everything looked ok until we did a POR, then it would not
come up. We had to restore the CPC.
I don't
W dniu 2016-01-07 o 15:12, Jon Butler pisze:
In short, my understanding is that FICON is a "super-set" of FCP. FICON cards
can be set to run in either FCP or FICON mode, but not both at the same time.
There two definitions of FC.
One is common, but inaccurate, FC is fibre channel network
On 1/6/2016 6:04 PM, Tom Marchant wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 19:01:15 -0500, Tony Harminc wrote:
And this all started with arbitrary (GOFF) files as input to SMP/E,
which has, AFAIK, no delimiter option on e.g. the ++MOD statement. JCL
isn't the only thing with this problem. A single GOFF file
On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 20:58:42 -0500, Tony Harminc wrote:
>
>> When all else fails, try an experiment. (Maybe then read the instructions.)
>> I just tried HLASMC PARM=GOFF. Every record in SYSLIN begins with X'03'.
>> So, on the basis of this unscientific sample, no problem.
>
>Dang! And it even
On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 07:02:45 -0800, Ed Jaffe wrote:
>I have been in this exact situation. IIRC, it was a z/VM guest with no
>network connections. (Users were DIALing in.) We tried to send a large
>amount of binary data in 80-column format to its RDR using the z/VM
>SPOOL command from another guest
Here is one way to do this, if you don't need to call other external Rexx
programs:
//*
//* This JCL demonstrates how to create and execute an in-stream
//* REXX procedure. The PARM field contains only a single x'00'.
Hello,
We have z/OS and z/VM both in our Mainframe in diff LPAR. We
recently added few more CHPID and devices and provided access to z/VM LPAR
by coping the current IODF into new IODF and created production IODF from
this new IODF. After this,
1) I used UPDATE option while built IOCDS
That that is is that that is not is not?
In a message dated 1/7/2016 7:02:55 P.M. Central Standard Time,
charl...@mcn.org writes:
"that"?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
SMF 106 Subtype 1, SMF6ACPC, 17-characters.
Barry
Herbert W. "Barry" Merrill, PhD
President-Programmer
MXG Software
Merrill Consultants
10717 Cromwell Drive
Dallas, TX 75229-5112
ba...@mxg.com
Fax: 214 350 3694 - Still works, received as email
Tel: 214 351 1966 - Unreliable, please use email
At 09:16 -0600 on 01/07/2016, Tom Marchant wrote about Re: Sort for not there?:
>We randomly tried every possibility we could think
of and none of them worked. Eventually, we created a checklist and
systematically used an editor FIND function to locate a working
combination. A real PITA and
On 1/7/2016 7:16 AM, Tom Marchant wrote:
I like Robert Rosenberg's solution: sort the file on the first two
columns and look for a suitable gap in the sorted data.Probably a lot
quicker than your checklist.
Indeed. That would have been much quicker. But, what if no suitable
delimiter can be
Sri h Kolusu wrote:
>I was trying to stay away from this topic as you didn't want this thread to be
>another sort related solution.
This thread is one of those drifting threads which I sometimes reluctantly
read...
>However since you brought up the capabilities of DFSORT, I had to chime in
I think, grouping doesn't help me.
Why I'm considering CPC name change: there are two machines managed by
the HMC, the serial numbers and it's names are the same with one
character exception. This is error prone. More: LPARs view shows all the
LPARs from both machines. LPAR names are different
Right. And from point of view - as a nosy perisher :-) - I want to be
using the names customers have for their machines when talking to them.
Today I have to ask and use a lookup table to match to Plant/Serial.
General rant: "Machines should be self-documenting".
Reality: "Largely they are".
Martin Packer wrote:
>General rant: "Machines should be self-documenting".
In what Galaxy? ;-D
I also want that cables to be self-documented or rather self-labelled at BOTH
ends ...
>Reality: "Largely they are".
Yep. Very true in *this* Galaxy...
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
Janet Graff wrote:
>That worked. Now I have the time formatted very nicely.
What worked? Please be kind to clarify what worked and what reply/replies
really helped you?
It would really help if the persons who asked for help, also post the results
of success/failures on IBM-MAIN so that
At 09:43 -0800 on 01/07/2016, Ed Jaffe wrote about Re: Sort for not there?:
On 1/7/2016 7:16 AM, Tom Marchant wrote:
I like Robert Rosenberg's solution: sort the file on the first two
columns and look for a suitable gap in the sorted data.Probably a lot
quicker than your checklist.
Skip Robinson wrote:
>2. Create a new group for the CEC.
This it is! That step alone should ensure there are no ill consequences.
This what I (and others) did during creating+preparing of LPARs during Y2K
testing... I have been advised by IBM to create brand new things so no live
LPARs are
I think you had a step out of sequence
Are you getting that message during activate?
You may want to look at this if you a sure they in fact do match
activate iodf=a2,soft=novalidate
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
>>Does SORT have no option to count records with identical keys? That
might reduce the scanning burden.
Paul,
I was trying to stay away from this topic as you didn't want this thread
to be another sort related solution. However since you brought up the
capabilities of DFSORT, I had to chime
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 19:01:15 -0500, Tony Harminc wrote:
And this all started with arbitrary (GOFF) files as input to SMP/E,
which has, AFAIK, no delimiter option on e.g. the ++MOD statement. JCL
isn't the only thing with this problem. A single GOFF file could
plausibly
What SMF records contain the CPC name?
Thanks, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Cloud & Systems Performance, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 10:08:40 -0500, Bill Ashton wrote:
>Here is one way to do this, if you don't need to call other external Rexx
>programs:
>//*
>//* This JCL demonstrates how to create and execute an in-stream
>//* REXX
We 'had' to do this, once.
IBM originally recommended that LPAR names be independent of the 'name' of the
image name running within it.
Then, with GDPS, they recommended the reverse. The implementation went without
a hitch.
All our reporting/billing? Not so well.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
Hi Group
I am running fix cat report to identify required and recommended services
for z13 on z/OS 2.1.
Are there any published z13 PSP Exclusively for z/OS 2.1 ?
The intention is just to download only a required to apply
Any advise would be much appreciated
Jake
Same
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Thomas David Rivers
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 12:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Sort for not there?
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>On Wed, 6 Jan 2016
On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 14:53:04 -0500, John Eells wrote:
>REPORT MISSINGFIX will create a job in the SMPPUNCH data set to do
>exactly what you seem to be asking for.
First, download the latest Enhanced Holddata, which contains all of the
Fixcat information that REPORT MISSINGFIX uses.
--
Tom
I for one had a different interpretation of 'rename'. You just want an icon
on the HMC to have your own 'nickname'? True CEC name still P+serial#? What
I would do/have done in the past is this. Very simple and requires no
refresh. And no ill consequences if it's not right the first time.
1. Go
38 matches
Mail list logo
