Re: USER FORCE/Logoff pending

2011-05-02 Thread Wakser, David
Figure out which device(s) are responsible (usually tape drives, but could be OSA). Then issue multiple (often, 10 or more are required) HALT commands for those devices. If tape drives, re-IML the unit. David Wakser -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System

Re: USER FORCE/Logoff pending

2011-05-02 Thread Shahin.Suleiman
Thanks David, It probably is an OSA. The machine is up now but with connection errors. Suleiman Shahin Systems Programmer (386) 447 2552 -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Wakser, David Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 5:15

Re: USER FORCE/Logoff pending

2011-05-02 Thread Wakser, David
Try varying off (and then back on, in the opposite order) the devices, path, and CHPID - I believe that will reset the physical device. David Wakser -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Shahin.Suleiman Sent: Monday, May 02,

Re: USER FORCE/Logoff pending

2011-05-02 Thread Shahin.Suleiman
At this time the suspect is network connection between the 2096 and other devices. I'll wait to hear their verdict then try if still a problem. Thanks. Suleiman Shahin Systems Programmer (386) 447 2552

Re: USER FORCE/Logoff pending

2011-05-02 Thread Shahin.Suleiman
I tried varying the chpid off and had no response and my userid is hung. The chpid feeds a controller that someone just powered off. Suleiman Shahin Systems Programmer

Re: Error : DMSITS135S Maximum SVC depth 200 has been exceeded

2011-05-02 Thread Amar Moh
Hi, Sorry for my late response. Thanks Stephen, Les and Mike for responding! Yes, there were two linked disks that had the same exec along with the A disk where it was present too. When I remove one of the disks, it works fine. But we have had this setup for a long time i.e. apart from A

Re: Duplicate IPs on VSWITCHes - Feature or Defect

2011-05-02 Thread David Boyes
Are these layer 2 or layer 3? If layer 2, then they are (and should be) paying zero attention to the IP address. Layer 2 cares only about MAC addresses. Layer 3 is more subtle. Technically a real switch should attempt only to insert the address in the forwarding table and then the latest entry

Re: Duplicate IPs on VSWITCHes - Feature or Defect

2011-05-02 Thread Mark Wheeler
David, They're layer 3. The situation is that the IPs were registered on one VSWITCH, and passed on to real switches in the external network. Later, another host registered the same IPs on a different VSWITCH, which failed to pass them on to the external network (rejected because they were

Re: Duplicate IPs on VSWITCHes - Feature or Defect

2011-05-02 Thread David Boyes
The situation is that the IPs were registered on one VSWITCH, and passed on to real switches in the external network. Later, another host registered the same IPs on a different VSWITCH, which failed to pass them on to the external network (rejected because they were dups). The 2nd VSWITCH

Re: Duplicate IPs on VSWITCHes - Feature or Defect

2011-05-02 Thread Mark Wheeler
On the 1st VSWITCH, Q VSWITCH ... DETAILS shows: Unicast IP Addresses: snip x.y.z.161MAC: 02-00-00-00-00-3D x.y.z.162MAC: 02-00-00-00-00-3D x.y.z.163MAC:

Re: Error : DMSITS135S Maximum SVC depth 200 has been exceeded

2011-05-02 Thread Kris Buelens
Isn't this simply an EXEC that calls itself over over again. Or, dirty execs that do not use ADDRESS COMMAND and by accident call an EXEC instead of the built-in CMS command. 2011/5/2 Amar Moh amar_...@yahoo.com Hi, Sorry for my late response. Thanks Stephen, Les and Mike for responding!

Re: Error : DMSITS135S Maximum SVC depth 200 has been exceeded

2011-05-02 Thread Les Koehler
It looks like something else on that linked disk has changed. Perhaps the linking process (VMLINK?) is doing something different, like EXECLOADing something that is now tripping you up. As I said before: Look at the log file and the console spool file for clues. It should be quite obvious.

How do I assemble a CP EXIT ?

2011-05-02 Thread Dieltiens Geert
Hi all, I'm trying to assemble the JAMSAMA sample for CP EXIT 1200 (for CP DIAL), from z/VM manual 'CP EXIT CUSTOMIZATION'. I understand the assembler sourcecode from the sample, and I've made my own version with minor modifications. Now I would like to assemble it in CMS. Can anyone tell me how

Re: How do I assemble a CP EXIT ?

2011-05-02 Thread Hughes, Jim
Here is what I do: VMFSETUP ZVM CP VMFHLASM OITW2H01 ZVM CP where OITW2H01 is my exit's name. Good Luck. Jim Hughes Consulting Systems Programmer Mainframe Technical Support Group Department of Information Technology State of

Re: How do I assemble a CP EXIT ?

2011-05-02 Thread David Boyes
You need the High Level Assembler product (extra cost) or the Dignus assembler (also extra cost) to build the module. The MACLIB statements are documented in the discussion of the exit. The old F-level ASSEMBLE command cannot build current CP modules correctly.

Re: How do I assemble a CP EXIT ?

2011-05-02 Thread Dieltiens Geert
Jim, I tried that and the assembly worked, with no errors. I'll try to use the TEXT module as a CP EXIT tomorrow. Thanks! Bye, Geert. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Hughes, Jim Sent: maandag 2 mei 2011 22:30 To:

Re: How do I assemble a CP EXIT ?

2011-05-02 Thread Dave Jones
Hi, Geert. If Jim's instructions worked for you, that means that your site has the HLASM licensed and installed! You should be able to follow the rest of the instruction and load your CP EXITlet us know if that works. DJ On 05/02/2011 03:42 PM, Dieltiens Geert wrote: Jim, I tried that and

Re: Duplicate IPs on VSWITCHes - Feature or Defect

2011-05-02 Thread Alan Altmark
On Monday, 05/02/2011 at 11:48 EDT, Mark Wheeler mwheele...@hotmail.com wrote: The situation is that the IPs were registered on one VSWITCH, and passed on to real switches in the external network. Later, another host registered the same IPs on a different VSWITCH, which failed to pass them

Re: USER FORCE/Logoff pending

2011-05-02 Thread Alan Altmark
On Monday, 05/02/2011 at 06:33 EDT, Shahin.Suleiman shahin.sulei...@palmcoastdata.com wrote: I tried varying the chpid off and had no response and my userid is hung. The chpid feeds a controller that someone just powered off. If possible, get a restart dump and open a PMR. Long-wait

Re: Error : DMSITS135S Maximum SVC depth 200 has been exceeded

2011-05-02 Thread Alan Altmark
On Monday, 05/02/2011 at 11:32 EDT, Amar Moh amar_...@yahoo.com wrote: But if I remove the non-compiled version from A disk, it still fails. I am reluctant to conclude that its due to the compiled rexx as the same is working in other vmserve servers. There is something else causing the

Re: Restrictions in FCP point-to-point topology

2011-05-02 Thread Mark Post
On 4/28/2011 at 12:19 PM, Alan Ackermanalan.acker...@bankofamerica.com wrote: We are planning to use FCP disk with a z/Linux under z/VM system, running under z/VM 5.4. To reduce cost, we are planning to use the point-to-point topology. If you don't use a SAN fabric switch, discovering and