[4/18/2004 2:49 AM] Anand Babu :
I want to understand more about the legal issues.
1) Hosting at savannah.gnu.org. What issues do we have?
Hosted in the USA? You'd have DMCA / Patriot issues
3) Hosting under FSF India?
Right now, the indian copyright act is being cited.
And I must point out
hi Rishabh,
thanks for your support.
bbye.
=
Surendra Verma,
WD-22,Shivalik House,
IIT Delhi,
New Delhi-110016,
India.
ph -11-26527315
Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your partner online.
http://yahoo.shaadi.com/india-mat
The 8 cd's encompass all the packages debian has to offer.In most cases
you wont need all that.For a base install all you need is CD1.If you want
a GUI install aftre that then you need CD2.The rest can all be done using
apt.
So my suggestion.download(or burn if u have already downloaded) only
C
Hi,
I downloaded the Debian Linux 3.02 but i am
totally confused as to why there are so many cds there
(totalling
8 as compared to generally 3 in others).
Is it becuase that it has a lot more packages
there or is it because the source code is included in
it.the site http://www.debian.o
[Please upgrade if you use Zope with the ZCatalog plug-in on any
platform -- Raju]
This is an RFC 1153 digest.
(1 message)
--
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
Can anyone provide a single session lecture on Open Source Software.This is for a few
group.
Kindly advice.
regards,
ARUN KUMAR.A
___
ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ghane,
> "Ghane" == Sanjeev Gupta writes:
Ghane> On Saturday, April 17, 2004 2:49 PM [GMT+0800=SGT], Raj
Ghane> Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You may not like it but you'd have to live with it. Just as
>> you have the
On Saturday, April 17, 2004 2:49 PM [GMT+0800=SGT],
Raj Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You may not like it but you'd have to live with it. Just as
> you have the right to embed security into your software, others
> have the right to study, hack and bypass that security.
Rights are defined b
> I agree. This is probably the assumption under which
> guns are allowed in
> USA. But what about a country like ours, where
> people are not allowed
> (easily) to keep guns because they have a potential
> of hurting others?
>
The reasons are probably political, not to mention
archaic laws and
Raj Mathur wrote:
Remember -- it's not the tool that is illegal, it's the use to which
it is put by an individual that is or is not.
I agree. This is probably the assumption under which guns are allowed in
USA. But what about a country like ours, where people are not allowed
(easily) to keep guns
10 matches
Mail list logo
