> I agree. This is probably the assumption under which > guns are allowed in > USA. But what about a country like ours, where > people are not allowed > (easily) to keep guns because they have a potential > of hurting others? > The reasons are probably political, not to mention archaic laws and the absence of good lawmakers (who're actually supported in parliament!).
I mean, legalizing guns would probably be better, because most are available illegally, and thus untraceable after a "situation". But, this opens up a totally new debate, one which has raged the US for eons : Gun law regulations. -- vik ===== -- Viksit Gaur http://www.viksit.com me[at]viksit.com viksit[at]linux-delhi[dot]org 'Not all who wander are lost.' - J.R.R. Tolkien, The Fellowship of the Ring __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
