Another option might be the "Bountysource" website:
https://www.bountysource.com/teams/julialang
This would get around having to have a contract, and so may be easier to
use with grant funds.
On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 1:58:02 PM UTC+10, Sheehan Olver wrote:
>
>
> Has anyone included "Juli
ok, thank you both for this. I'll keep it in mind for the next opportunity.
Christoph
On Monday, 25 April 2016 12:49:08 UTC+1, Viral Shah wrote:
>
> +1 to what Steve says. We do a bunch of stuff with grants at Julia
> Computing, which fund new capabilities, or building domain specific
> package
+1 to what Steve says. We do a bunch of stuff with grants at Julia
Computing, which fund new capabilities, or building domain specific
packages. If you look at our blog posts, you can see the kind of work
funded through such grants. In the simplest case, it will greatly help both
parties, if gr
On Friday, 22 April 2016 21:30:27 UTC+1, Steven G. Johnson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, April 22, 2016 at 4:04:29 PM UTC-4, Christoph Ortner wrote:
>>
>> I've run into a similar problem in the past, but this was before Julia
>> Computing. If `Julia Professional Edition` or `Deployment Edition` come
On Friday, April 22, 2016 at 4:04:29 PM UTC-4, Christoph Ortner wrote:
>
> I've run into a similar problem in the past, but this was before Julia
> Computing. If `Julia Professional Edition` or `Deployment Edition` comes
> with some reasonable features are not included in the free version, then
I've run into a similar problem in the past, but this was before Julia
Computing. If `Julia Professional Edition` or `Deployment Edition` comes
with some reasonable features are not included in the free version, then
maybe it could be justified?
Christoph
On Friday, 22 April 2016 01:32:51 UTC+2, Sheehan Olver wrote:
>
>
> There is also a problem with including a postdoc with the expectation of
> her/him carrying out basic software tasks: time spent on software
> development is not really a help getting an academic job.
>
That's exactly how I f
maybe academic partners is not the correct term. But if you for instance
need HPC but writing HPC infrastructure is not your expertise (hence you
won't get funding for that) there might be other universities that do
research on HPC and might be quite interesting getting in touch with a new
prog
Yes software development “because it is needed” for research works
well, and indeed there are many cases where people have built academic
successful careers while developing software.
The catch is that there’s always a lot of time consuming maintenance
tasks involved in keepin
Well you mentioned "Thread support for Julia" and I could imagine that
there are academic partners that could work on this if they could get
funding.
The problem with finding a postdoc that does software development is indeed
tricky. Usually this will not be full time but people will work on a
Maybe I don’t understand what you mean by “academic partner”, but I can’t
imagine academics jumping at the chance of working on someone else’s code…
There is also a problem with including a postdoc with the expectation of
her/him carrying out basic software tasks: time spent on software devel
An alternative would be to instead make a collaboration with an academic
partner that is capable of working on this. There are various large open
source projects that use this model.
Cheers
Tobias
Am Donnerstag, 21. April 2016 16:56:57 UTC+2 schrieb Steven G. Johnson:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, A
On Wednesday, April 20, 2016 at 11:58:02 PM UTC-4, Sheehan Olver wrote:
>
> Has anyone included "Julia Computing" charges in a grant proposal? Is
> this something that should be encouraged?
>
That would count as hiring a consultant with your grant funding. Some
funding agencies allow this (e
13 matches
Mail list logo