RE: [lace] Lace relay revisited

2006-02-03 Thread Ruth Budge
I'll second that I've been pondering the same question all week. Ruth (Sydney, Australia) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tess Parrish Sent: 04 February 2006 01:33 To: lace@arachne.com Subject: [lace] Lace relay revis

[lace] Lace relay revisited

2006-02-03 Thread Tess Parrish
When does this discussion qualify as material for Chat? Tess - To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line: unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [lace] Lace relay revisited

2006-02-02 Thread Ruth Budge
L PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bevw Sent: 03 February 2006 13:12 To: Malvary J Cole Cc: ARACHNE Subject: Re: [lace] Lace relay revisited How about using the lace list itself? Those who normally subscribe to the digested version but would like to participate in the lace relay could subscribe to the reflect

Re: [lace] Lace relay revisited

2006-02-02 Thread bevw
How about using the lace list itself? Those who normally subscribe to the digested version but would like to participate in the lace relay could subscribe to the reflected just for this occasion? and those who don't want a flood of e-mails could unsub from reflected and subscribe to the digest, and

RE: [lace] Lace relay revisited

2006-02-02 Thread Janette Humphrey
Message- From: Malvary J Cole [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 3 February 2006 1:01 AM To: ARACHNE Subject:Re: [lace] Lace relay revisited This suggestion would help the "rolling" part because one person in each region wouldn't have to be responsible and

Re: [lace] Lace relay revisited - technical question

2006-02-02 Thread Clay Blackwell
I'm not responding as a technical expert, but to add to the technical question which Margot posed. I have had the experience of having a server look at the number of names in the address boxes and send it back to me undelivered because it looked like spam. Specifically, when I was on AOL (no long

Re: [lace] Lace relay revisited

2006-02-02 Thread Malvary J Cole
"Helen wrote: What might be easier is to set up a separate mailing list (eg lace-relay) for the relay. That way, you've only got one email address to worry about and the onus is on individual participants to subscribe/unsubscribe" This suggestion would help the "rolling" part because one per

Re: [lace] Lace relay revisited

2006-02-02 Thread Helen
What might be easier is to set up a separate mailing list (eg lace-relay) for the relay. That way, you've only got one email address to worry about and the onus is on individual participants to subscribe/unsubscribe although the coordinator should also be able to add/remove members if there're

Re: [lace] Lace relay revisited

2006-02-02 Thread Margot Walker
On Thursday, February 2, 2006, at 06:03 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For example, do we want to encourage new members to join arachne so they can join in. The way it worked last Sun., people sent me their email addresses and I created a 'Group' (and had to keep adding people to the group as

[lace] Lace relay revisited

2006-02-02 Thread Laceandbits
I have been amazed (and flattered) at the interest my idea has produced! I spoke to the Lace Guild this morning about the convention and mentioned the relay while I was on the phone. If it looks as if the event is a possibility, and if it looks as if National Lace Day is a potential date, then