Samuel Koscelansky / SUBNET wrote:
I tested shaping on vlan and it seems OK for me (even though my switch
doesn't do vlan it doesn't seem to block oversize frames). I noticed a
few things with your setup -
#classes for download
/sbin/tc class add dev eth0.100 parent 100: classid 100:1 htb
Hello.
I'm running linux box with Slackware 9.1 and
compiled kernel 2.4.31 with "yes" to VLANs and "yes" to all QoS.
On this box i have more ethernet
interfaces:
eth0
eth1
eth2
and so as more vlan interfaces:
eth0.100
eth1.3
eth1.4
This is entrace(uplink) router to our whole network
and
Andy Furniss wrote:
Saying that I did notice that HTB was dropping -
maybe the default queue length is shorter now? It does seem a bit
strange though, I see drops where I expect the queue to be long enough
for my rwin and a class with two tcps on the go had less drops than one
with one -
Andy Furniss wrote:
Leslie Patrick Polzer wrote:
Hello,
I have a serious problem with HTB which I wasn't able to solve myself.
I run a masquerading router with ppp0 as interface to the Internet.
Three clients need to share a downstream of 1 MBit, which I want
to divide with tc.
When I see a packet
Andy Furniss wrote:
Shaping from the narrow end of the bottleneck is a bit of a kludge,
you have to set your rates/ceils lower than link speed or you won't
have a queue to shape with.
Could you also elaborate this a bit further?
Many thanks so far!
Leslie
Leslie Patrick Polzer wrote:
Andy Furniss wrote:
Leslie Patrick Polzer wrote:
Hello,
I have a serious problem with HTB which I wasn't able to solve myself.
I run a masquerading router with ppp0 as interface to the Internet.
Three clients need to share a downstream of 1 MBit, which I want
to divide
Still problems :(
I upgraded to kernel 2.6.9 now, configured IMQ to hook itself up after
NAT, called it
from prerouting, used u32 (matching works), set the root class to a rate
of 800kBit
(which is 200 less than my link speed) - and the behavior gets even worse :(
Unfortunately, I cannot shape
On Friday 29 October 2004 11:36, Leslie Patrick Polzer wrote:
Still problems :(
I upgraded to kernel 2.6.9 now, configured IMQ to hook itself up after
NAT, called it
from prerouting, used u32 (matching works), set the root class to a rate
of 800kBit
(which is 200 less than my link speed) -
Quoting Leslie Patrick Polzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Still problems :(
I upgraded to kernel 2.6.9 now, configured IMQ to hook itself up after
NAT, called it
from prerouting, used u32 (matching works), set the root class to a rate
of 800kBit
(which is 200 less than my link speed) - and the
Leslie Patrick Polzer wrote:
Still problems :(
I upgraded to kernel 2.6.9 now, configured IMQ to hook itself up after
NAT, called it
from prerouting, used u32 (matching works), set the root class to a rate
of 800kBit
(which is 200 less than my link speed) - and the behavior gets even
worse :(
Andy Furniss wrote:
1
$TC class add dev imq0 parent 1:1 classid 1:32 htb rate 133kbit ceil
400kbit prio 1
I meant to delete the prio 1 - I don't know if it matters - I tested
with the other two.
Andy.
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL
Hello,
I have a serious problem with HTB which I wasn't able to solve myself.
I run a masquerading router with ppp0 as interface to the Internet.
Three clients need to share a downstream of 1 MBit, which I want
to divide with tc.
When I see a packet being forwarded to one of these clients, I give
did u try it with sfq ?
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 18:55:00 +0200, Leslie Patrick Polzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have a serious problem with HTB which I wasn't able to solve myself.
I run a masquerading router with ppp0 as interface to the Internet.
Three clients need to share a
Hello Leslie,
I had the same problem for kernel 2.4.27 and it was related to bug in HTB.
Use kernel =2.6.8.1 or apply patch from Devik's site
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/v3/htbfair.diff.
Best regards,
Zviad
Hello,
I have a serious problem with HTB which
Leslie Patrick Polzer wrote:
Hello,
I have a serious problem with HTB which I wasn't able to solve myself.
I run a masquerading router with ppp0 as interface to the Internet.
Three clients need to share a downstream of 1 MBit, which I want
to divide with tc.
When I see a packet being forwarded to
Dnia poniedziaek 06 wrzesie 2004 23:56, Cow napisa:
Hi folks.
Let's say I would like to make some bandwidth control on my network
using HTB. I have 2 clients:
[...]
I think a script as i described, could be very complex to write,
therefore i ask, whoever is here, for help.
Thank you all in
I've tryed to make a script, some of you, who thinks it looks ok?
DEV=eth2
DOWNLINK=1024
UPLINK=512
DOWN1=768
UP1=384
DOWN2=256
UP2=128
tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: htb default 20
tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate ${UPLINK}kbit burst
6k
tc class add dev $DEV parent
You might want to check out this script
http://www.geocities.com/jame_sj I just noticed a bug (that I need to
figure out...) in it but this should give a start..
Looks nice, want to share the bug with me? :-)
James
___
LARTC mailing list /
by zytek
Hello all, my first post here, maybe even I will help someone;)
I assume that you want somethink like:
data from server to LAN (PC1,PC2) unshaped (full 100mbit)
data from Internet to LAN shaped
Correct.
Then all you need to do is make classes with source 192.168.0.1 and
destination
Am Tuesday 07 September 2004 23:18 schrieb Cow:
zytec: (?)
I assume that you want somethink like:
data from server to LAN (PC1,PC2) unshaped (full 100mbit)
data from Internet to LAN shaped
Correct.
Not really an example, but you may have a look at my script [1].
It solves the 100Mbit
Hi folks.
Let's say I would like to make some bandwidth control on my network
using HTB. I have 2 clients:
PC1: 192.168.100.2
PC2: 192.168.100.3
Server:
192.168.100.1
This has 2 NIC's eth1 is local and eth2 is connected to the internet.
It could be nice to have a script, where you could
Hello,
I'm having some problems using HTB to prioritize traffic on my linux
router.
The main problem is as follows:
I have a 6Mbits channel on the metropolitan network and a 64kbps link
for the sites outside my country.
These 64kbps are dynamically allocated by my ISP so I
Doesn't anyone have any ideas regarding my problem ?
Mihai Tanasescu wrote:
Hello,
I'm having some problems using HTB to prioritize traffic on my linux
router.
The main problem is as follows:
I have a 6Mbits channel on the metropolitan network and a 64kbps link
for the sites outside my
Hello,
I'm having some problems using HTB to prioritize traffic on my linux router.
The main problem is as follows:
I have a 6Mbits channel on the metropolitan network and a 64kbps link
for the sites outside my country.
These 64kbps are dynamically allocated by my ISP so I usually get
Hi all!!
I'm new in the list.
I'm using Slackware 9.0 with 2.4.21
HTB 0.8.3
eth0
DEFAULT=30
eth0-2:30.dfl
RATE=256Kbit
BURST=32Kb
LEAF=sfq
This is my configuration, but, the shaper dosen't works in 32Kbps...
Anybody can help me?
Thanks
Guilherme
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 15:44, Guilherme Benkenstein wrote:
Hi all!!
I'm new in the list.
I'm using Slackware 9.0 with 2.4.21
HTB 0.8.3
eth0
DEFAULT=30
eth0-2:30.dfl
RATE=256Kbit
BURST=32Kb
LEAF=sfq
This is my configuration, but, the shaper dosen't works in 32Kbps...
On Thursday 24 July 2003 16:26, Delcho wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem with my htb in linux gateway machine.
Wana make this borrow to and from internet:
every user must be shaped to 32Kbit,max number of users are 6 in one
subnet /29
and all subnet must be shaped to 92Kbit,e.i every user will
]
To: Ratel [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 9:35 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb problem
On Thursday 12 June 2003 21:21, Ratel wrote:
Hi,
I have some interesting problem with htb , I set up root class and
sub-classess:
$TC qdisc add dev eth0 root handle
I have the same problem using tc and iptables. All traffic goes to
default.
I tried using tcng too: (eth0 as local NIC, eth1 as Inet nic, eth1
masquerading via iptables and bridged to DSL -I have the internet IP on NIC
2-)
#include fields.tc
#include ports.tc
dev eth1 {
egress {
On Saturday 14 June 2003 23:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey I hve the same problem. My packets are marked, my classes are OK
my filters are set OK
and all packets are passing through the root class!!
I think that this is a big problem. A know 1 more person that has the same
problem!
Ok. I
Hey I hve the same problem. My packets are marked, my classes are OK
my filters are set OK
and all packets are passing through the root class!!
I think that this is a big problem. A know 1 more person that has the same
problem!brbr
---mail.bGbr
li -
li12MB
liSMS e!
Hi,
I have some interesting problem with htb , I set up root class and
sub-classess:
$TC qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb
$TC class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1990kbit ceil 2000kbit
$TC class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 190kbit ceil 200kbit
$TC class add
do you have two nics? the 2megas internet is eth0 right? so you are tc'ing packets
going out of interface eth0.
paquets are comming from eth1 for example?
in such case you coutlf -t mangle -I PREROUTING -i eth1 -j MARK --set-mark {1|2|4|}
??
so packets going from internal (eth1) going out
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stef Coene
Sent: 12. juni 2003 21:35
To: Ratel; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb problem
adequate lines from firewall script :
[...]
# ftp
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0
On Thursday 12 June 2003 22:04, Morten Isaksen wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stef Coene
Sent: 12. juni 2003 21:35
To: Ratel; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb problem
adequate lines from firewall script
On Thursday 12 June 2003 21:46, Esteban wrote:
Stef! please explain me this:
When i use traffic shaper, i apply the root to the innterface i want to
controll the packets that are leaving right?
Yes.
The sum of classes should
not be greater than the root one.
Supossing i have 2 nics. One
Hi,
Ive been looking at tinkering with the linux traffic control stuff
lately and decided to try out the htb qdisc. My setup is as follows:
2 interfaces: eth0 goes to internet, and eth1 goes to a NAT'd subnet. eth0
has a 7mbit link, but only a 4.5 mbit link to the internet while eth1 is a
You have a typo :- kpbs
Also, it seems that the parent 1:1 is not created yet.
- Original Message -
From: Jay Wineinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, I get an error about illegal rate when I try to create a class
with:
$TC class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 30kpbs
grr, I thought i had checked everything close. Thanks =)
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
On Monday 09 December 2002 19:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am shaping traffic for ~250 users and i have noticed something is wrong:
Each user is being shaped from 32kbit/s to 2mbit/s.
When i run the script which creates the classes the following error is
printed to syslog: Dec
On Wednesday 28 August 2002 20:45, Stef Coene wrote:
The problem is that clients can have their bandwidths at maximum only if
they use a download accelerating software like DAP with multiple
symultanous threads. Using only one thread, a single download can reach
about 60% of the
Hello,
Besides a very good functionality, I have a small, yet stressing, problem.
Let's say I have a bandwidth of N bits.
I have X clients, everyone with his fixed bandwidth.
I create htb qdsics for each client. Each leaf has sfq queueing
discipline.
A sample config would be like this
Hello
I have a small (maybe typical?) problem with HTB. Present configuration is:
Kernel: 2.4.20-pre4 (with HTB, IMQ)
endeavour:/var/log# tc -V
tc utility, iproute2-ss010824
Which should support HTB because writes help for it ;-)
endeavour:~# tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1 htb ttt
What
endeavour:~# tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1 htb ttt
What is ttt?
Usage: ... qdisc add ... htb [default N] [r2q N]
default number of class to which unclassified packets are sent {1}
and so on
Why do you have that ttt option? If you remove ttt from the command, does
it work?
On Tuesday 14 May 2002 08:22, Arindam Haldar wrote:
hi all
After patching compiling htb3_2.4.17; imq-2.4.18; sch_geberic with
kernal 2.4.18 and iptables-1.2.6a-imq with iptables-1.2.7-20020423 i
faced the folowing problem patching htb3_tc with
iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss010824---
[root@test
hi all
After patching compiling htb3_2.4.17; imq-2.4.18; sch_geberic with
kernal 2.4.18 and iptables-1.2.6a-imq with iptables-1.2.7-20020423 i
faced the folowing problem patching htb3_tc with
iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss010824---
[root@test iproute2]# patch -p1 ../htb3_tc.diff
patching file
46 matches
Mail list logo
