Has anyone on the list successfully modeled a virtual WAN
infrastructure, or at least built a functional LEAF router within UML or
Xen? If so, I'd appreciate any suggestions you may have on the quickest
way to setup this virtual WAN.
I've been looking at 3 different virtualization methods to creat
I went with the Intel Pro/100 MT Quad Port Server Adapter, but got a
rude surprise after it arrived!
Contrary to all the sales literature, the card will _NOT_ fit in the
standard 32-bit PCI slot, at least not those available in any local PC
hardware, including the passive-backplane industrial rack
Hello Cpu,
Thanks for your fix. I like some more feedback from other users so this can be
added to ipsec the package. Anyone who can also test this?
Eric
-Original Message-
>From: "cpu memhd"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: 19-4-05 18:50:02
>To: "leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net"
>Subject: [l
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 12:54 -0400, Calvin Webster wrote:
> Has anyone on the list successfully modeled a virtual WAN
> infrastructure, or at least built a functional LEAF router within UML or
> Xen? If so, I'd appreciate any suggestions you may have on the quickest
> way to setup this virtual WAN.
Calvin Webster wrote:
I went with the Intel Pro/100 MT Quad Port Server Adapter, but got a
rude surprise after it arrived!
Contrary to all the sales literature, the card will _NOT_ fit in the
standard 32-bit PCI slot, at least not those available in any local PC
hardware, including the passive-back
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 14:00, Alvin Starr wrote:
> A solution for lots of ports is to use 802.1q vlans. You do need a
> switch capable of vlan managment but you can then have as many ethernet
> ports as you want.
I may only need one or two more so that may be a viable option for LANs
with low-ba
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 13:59, Arne Bernin wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 12:54 -0400, Calvin Webster wrote:
> > Has anyone on the list successfully modeled a virtual WAN
> > infrastructure, or at least built a functional LEAF router within UML or
> > Xen? If so, I'd appreciate any suggestions you m
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 16:02 -0400, Calvin Webster wrote:
> Thank you for the suggestions Arne.
>
> In my original post I was really looking for the fastest way to get 5
> LEAF routers and 5 or 6 minimal client hosts virtualized. I don't really
> want to have to spend a lot of time building and le
Hello Calvin,
>QEMU seems well suited for software development, but for my uses I think
>UML or Xen is the way to go. I'm leaning toward UML for now since it
>supposedly requires no modification to the guest OS. I don't want to
>have to recompile the LEAF distro to get started.
>
I'm not sure abou
Arne and Eric:
Based on your latest info and Eric's note I believe I'll give QEMU a
try. I like the simplicity (i.e. qemu -fda
Bering-uclibc-2.3beta2.img.bin).
I may be picking your brains while I setup the first few machines.
Thank you very much.
--Cal Webster
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 16:57, Arn
10 matches
Mail list logo
