Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) lilypondt...@organum.hu writes:
Dear LilyPond devs,
I have a problem with the LilyPond markup parsing, which prevents me
to finish my new release of LilyPondTool.
Could you help me a bit on that?
I have this ly file
26, 2011 at 8:45 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) lilypondt...@organum.hu writes:
Thank you David, this explains me what I didn't understand.
It turned out that somehow I was looking at a bad parser.yy.
Interesting. Where did you get it?
--
David
Dear LilyPond devs,
I have a problem with the LilyPond markup parsing, which prevents me to
finish my new release of LilyPondTool.
Could you help me a bit on that?
I have this ly file
--
dot = \markup {
q \musicglyph #accordion.dot
}
{ c^\dot }
--
When the
You should consider using a proper logging framework with different
logging levels.
Bert
On 1/2/11, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 02:25:57AM -0500, David Santamauro wrote:
On Sat, 1 Jan 2011 10:19:18 +
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
Yeah, it uses python only if convert-ly command (in PluginsPlugin
properties) is set to convert-ly.py (It looks for the py extension)
If you change that to just convert-ly that should work (at least that's the
intention, though I don't have linux so I can't test that.)
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at
Why I ask that?
I'm creating a little application and I would like to create simple midi files
on the fly, but I would like to avoid to enter in midi internals (avoid to waste
my time reinventing the wheel). And lilypond file format is really easy to use.
So my idea is:
* My program creates
(lilypond $* echo Success) || echo Failed
1. Lilypond is a multi-OS application, it doesn't just run under bash
on a Linux-derived OS (e.g cmd on Windows, running from detached gui
environment from JEdit or Frescobaldi - btw JEdit could also be
running under Windows).
Doesn't LilyPond
Francisco Vila wrote:
2010/3/26 David Bobroff bobr...@centrum.is:
Now, however, this notation convention has appeared again in another piece
by a different composer. An example can bee seen here:
http://centrum.is/~bobroff/lilypond/half-dot.png
As a first step, you can
Note that there are existing effort on creating a service that can be
used to render lilypond scores in Google Wave or in any web application.
You can get its code at
http://code.google.com/p/lilypondy/http://code.google.com/p/lilypondy/source/browse/#svn/trunk/lilywaveservlet
You can see
The lexer reads regular expressions, and tries to match them to a rule.
A rule will return a token and a value (yylval). These two will be used
by the parser to interpret the input.
This is so simple.
So for example how a note name is recognized:
a note name like fs will be read as
Why not ask for rights from Stockhausen's copyright owner?
I would try:
m...@stockhausen.org
Anyway, the fact that the example is an SVG is not too good: it has
problems displaying the tuplet numbers, and a pp.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
Thanks for letting me know about this. I used be strongly against top
posting and was quite vocal about it. I found that I was just
alienating myself from newer Internet users who didn't know what I was
talking about. It appears that this list is populated by a lot of long
term Internet users
I think you don't understand what top posting means: It means that you quote
the whole message (and all messages that it quoted) and simply add your reply
at the top. This way, each mail contains the whole history!
I wanted to say that I prefer that to quote the whole message and simply
Hi,
for the LilyPond Google Wave plugin, to ease hosting LilyPond services,
I created detailed instructions about how to set up a good chroot jail.
Could it be (worth) linked in the doc somehow?
http://code.google.com/p/lilypondy/wiki/LilyPondInJail
Thanks,
Bert
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 04:54:59PM +0100, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
wrote:
for the LilyPond Google Wave plugin, to ease hosting LilyPond services,
I created detailed instructions about how to set up a good chroot jail.
Could it be (worth) linked in the doc somehow?
Dunno what the wave
Just a heads up for those who are thinking about hosting part of the
distributed LilyPond server vision.
I created a Java servlet based service for LilyPond for the purposes of
Google Wave.
It runs on a virtual private server with 256MB RAM (running Ubuntu
Linux, Tomcat, a database and nothing
A Chordname like thing would take quite much time to implement and I
don't think it is important enough for most of the users to make it happen.
Though you can use the Lyrics context for this, because you can write
markups as lyric syllables if I'm right. On the lilypond-user list I'm
quite
if it is not the first
char.
Hans Aberg wrote:
On 13 Nov 2009, at 10:08, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
I think changing the LilyPond parser to support BOM in the middle (ie
not at the beginning) of the file is very hard. Actually if it is not
at the beginning, then it should be treated as a regular
Yes, code formatting involves fascism.
- Someone, a lead architect should decide upon rules.
- Then a tool must be used to force these rules. It shouldn't be the
tool's rules, but the tool should support the rules defined by the lead
developer.
- You should NOT run it on all existing files.
-
Forget the tool. Astyle is very configurable, but we still could need
our own formatter (though I wouldn't like that).
Developing C++ code on Windows is practically impossible, but can be
well done with the VirtualBox pc for which I host the ISO (see the CG :))
So it doesn't matter whether the
I feel a very big obstacle for fixing bugs: the lack of modern tools for
developing LilyPond.
For example in the CG there are many advices about Emacs, which
according to the opinion of the 94% of the expert (really expert!)
software developers I know (there are quite many of them) has been a
Sure, though I'm afraid they are mostly Java programmers.
One of them declined to participate even in LilyPondTool.
Bert
Would you please invite a couple of dozen of them to help with lilypond
development?
I only know about 3 really expert! programmers, possibly 6 plain
expert programmers in
Perhaps even the development platform should be changed here and there
to make sure there are good tools to use.
One thing I have learnt in the past: it is mostly pointless to try
supporting a platform that is not your own choice. If others are
passionate enough about it, they will do a
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
I'm talking about developer tools. For example, some months ago I
got the advice to use grep to browse LilyPond source code.
BTW, have you found something better?
Werner
Eclipse is quite good at finding macro definitions etc., but it relies
on some special
Graham Percival wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 01:40:37PM +0100, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
I feel a very big obstacle for fixing bugs: the lack of modern tools for
developing LilyPond.
What, precisely do you mean by this?
- C++ and scheme sucks? I doubt this will change
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
I'm talking about developer tools. For example, some months ago I
got the advice to use grep to browse LilyPond source code.
BTW, have you found something better?
Eclipse is quite good at finding macro definitions etc., but it
relies on some special build
Yes, that suffice if you are looking for text.
But if you are looking for function and class definition, reference,
exception throwing places, macro expansion as tooltip etc. There are a
lot of things a good development environment must do for effective work.
dem...@suffolk.lib.ny.us wrote:
Yes, mod_rewrite can do that. I can look up how tomorrow, as i have this on my
servers.
Original message
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
Sent: 12 Nov 2009 12:47 -08:00
To: lilypond-u...@gnu.org
Cc: Lily devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org, Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org
I think that the question is not whether we want to use a code formatter but
which one. Ideally applied automatically when pushing.
Also, is there a tool for c++ like checkstyle and pmd in the java world? That
could check for formatting issues and code smells and bad practices.
Original
Hi,
can something be done to make Google display latest doc and not 2.9?
Thanks,
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
It is a regression. BOM was supported for sure.
Patrick McCarty wrote:
On 2009-11-11, Francisco Vila wrote:
Hello. When LilyPond for Linux encounters a BOM from files made with
the Windows notepad, it issues an error.
Has this always been the case, or is this a new issue with 2.13.7?
I would add: make Scheme code as portable as possible.
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:48 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering what the Lilypond policies are for using SRFI, such as
SRFI-13 for string functions. My question was triggered by looking
David Kastrup wrote:
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) lilypondt...@organum.hu writes:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:48 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
I was wondering what the Lilypond policies are for using
SRFI, such as SRFI-13 for string
Wow too.
Actually, there are things in Feta what I don't feel natural either.
For example: the caesura sign, the G-clef and the trill indication feels
better for me in Gonville.
Though the G-clef is I think a clear LilyPond watermark, so I would keep
that one :)
The best would be if I could
A learning curve is always steep:
http://www.psywww.com/intropsych/ch07_cognition/learning_curve.html
Bert
Mark Knoop wrote:
At 17:37 on 30 Jul 2009, Mark Polesky wrote:
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
I think it's possibly to detect keypresses in javascript.
1) Would it be cool
not certain that 4.3pre16 qualifies as a major annoucement,
but as I said, I'm willing to apply a patch regardless of these
misgivings.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 07:44:13AM +0200, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
I haven't got any answer yet, so now I'm a bit afraid that it's going
I haven't got any answer yet, so now I'm a bit afraid that it's going to
be ignored.
Who could put this announcement to the NEWS (I do think it's a good idea)?
The latest version of LilyPondTool has been released to the jEdit plugin
repository. Now it supports Virtual Piano and MIDI input,
There are many other commands that have the same name in markup and
normal context.
Mark Polesky írta:
Thomas Morgan wrote:
Here is a patch which defines `parenthesize', a new markup command
which works like `bracket'. It's mainly useful for parenthesizing
columns containing several
Wouldn't it be a good idea to post these announcement to the NEWS of the
LilyPond homepage?
The latest version of LilyPondTool has been released to the jEdit plugin
repository. Now it supports Virtual Piano and MIDI input, and a dockable
PDF viewer with advanced point-and-click support. To
Would it be theoretically possible to include other metadata in the
point-and-click url besides the input file position?
I'm looking at:
(define (grob-cause offset grob
I'm not sure, how much information is included in that grob object.
If a text script for example would have the information
1) Memory: use the recommended base size of 384 MB?
* are there system requirements for compiling LilyPond?
* Do I need more RAM to compile the program than I would to
compile just the docs?
* I initially selected 384, but then VirtualBox warned me that
384 MB is more than
I hope nobody. For a potential user, the term GNU is incomprehensible.
Bert
Graham Percival wrote:
On the new website, I'm following the previous website which
simply wrote LilyPond. Does anybody want to make a strong case
in favor of replacing this with GNU/LilyPond everywhere?
(or maybe
I played a bit with jEdit's console:
In jEdit Console plugin you need to add
%set GUILE_LOAD_PATH g:\program files\lilypond\usr\share\guile\1.8
and then you can start guile from the System Shell.
Unfortunately the LilyPond shell doesn't support the #(top-repl)
discussed in
Hi,
I'd like to dig myself into the C++ source of LilyPond.
I have a long-wished feature, for support automatic lyric contraction.
That means the following:
When there is not enough space for a hyphen to appear, the hyphen is
removed. Like instead of yeah - yeah - yeah, yeah yeah yeah. In
be
enought to make sure there is a property, which in contraction
situations would allow me to override the default spacing.
Bert
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to dig myself into the C++ source of LilyPond.
I have a long-wished feature, for support
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Bertalan Fodor
(LilyPondTool)lilypondt...@organum.hu wrote:
I'd like to dig myself into the C++ source of LilyPond.
I have a long-wished feature, for support automatic lyric contraction.
That means the following:
When
A quick update:
- tried Anjuta - couldn't import LilyPond
- tried KDevelop - there were problems with it regarding setting
different arguments to lilypond
- tried Eclipse CDT - after some tutorial about importing the project
Jonathan, only one issue:
- If a command is not found (like typing 'asdf' in the terminal window),
some python script is telling errors. Is that intentional?
Just for the record:
- On Asus EEE 901 KDevelop works very well using this VirtualBox +
LilyUbuntu setup, running on a pen drive.
- I
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
Jonathan, only one issue:
- If a command is not found (like typing 'asdf' in the terminal
window), some python script is telling errors. Is that intentional?
Can you post the terminal output from this? The only message I see
when
Now I'm running lilybuntu in Sun VirtualBox from my pendrive. Successfully
built LilyPond, now I start playing with kdevelop.
Thanks for the fun.
Bert
Graham Percival wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 04:44:30PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 6/13/09 11:39 PM, Bertalan Fodor lilypondt
Yes, that was a good idea. Now I'm gonna try this thing out on my Eee Pc. :)
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Bertalan Fodor wrote:
Now I'm running lilybuntu in Sun VirtualBox from my pendrive.
Successfully
built LilyPond, now I start playing with kdevelop.
Thanks for the fun.
Bert
Cool! Thanks
Well, Eclipse runs very well on my netbook with Atom and 2gb ram. But the cdt
is still very limited. Also its startup from the pen drive is too slop. But
kdevelop seems all right, which has ctags integration and looks up macro
definitions in a second.
Bert
What tools can be used to develop? To debug, browse the source, etc?
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
message
From: Carl D. Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu
Sent: 13 Jun 2009 20:15 -06:00
To: Bertalan Fodor lilypondt...@organum.hu, Jonathan Kulp
jonlancek...@gmail.com
Cc: Tim Wilkinson mu3...@yahoo.co.uk, lilypond-devel@gnu.org
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: development on windows
On 6
Tim, have you used VMware before? This should allow you to
compile LilyPond inside a virtual machine. I'm not certain what
the best way is to transfer the iso from Jonathan to you, though.
The goal of this iso to make it usable on a virtualization tool. The
open source Sun VirtualBox
- does anybody feel like making cygwin packages for the missing
software?
Well, for some time I used to be the cygwin maintainer of lilypond. Was
quite nightmare.
- does anybody have VMware (commercial version) and feel like
making a small Linux installation which has all the required
Percival wrote:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:26:41PM +0200, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
- does anybody have VMware (commercial version) and feel like
making a small Linux installation which has all the required
software? Potential contributors would be able to run this
in the free
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
VirtualBox is Open Source and runs on Linux hosts, so I would
recommend this.
Creating an OS that can be used is a matter of creating a disk image.
One approach is to install ubuntu on the virtual machine, then
install the additional
BTW, having said all of this, I actually have an .iso of my own remix
of xubuntu that has all of the Lilypond build tools installed already.
It's kind of big, about 1.1GB, so it either has to go on a DVD or it
can be used as an .iso to install it in a virtual machine. I used a
tool called
As we are looking for windows-experienced developers I really think that
the ubuntu way would be better, it is easier for us windowsers.
If you guys think it would be useful then I'll have a go at it. I
think I can remaster xubuntu with all the Lilypond build tools and get
it under 700MB to
wrote:
On 5/22/09 7:25 AM, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
lilypondt...@organum.hu wrote:
By the way, who's offering to spend the 5-20 hours required to
implement such changes to the parser? (whatever we end up
deciding)
And also in the LilyPondTool parser? ;)
Bert,
As mucn
Just wondering.
Is the fact, that a change like this breaks existing editor support for
LilyPond, considered at all?
Graham Percival wrote:
In the large DOC: Makefile thread that nobody new is going to
read, there was a proposal to use .ily to indicate setup
lilypond files.
I quite like
That's fine for me. I will notify you if I figured out what could be
broken.
Graham Percival wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 01:13:06PM +0200, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
Is the fact, that a change like this breaks existing editor support for
LilyPond, considered at all
Wikipedia won't allow lilypond due to security and performance reasons
as far as I know.
I and other have already created quite useful mediawiki plugins.
Bert
Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/4/21 Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima heldergeov...@gmail.com:
Hi everybody!
I would like to know if there
Yes, using guile you can download the file to /tmp for example and then include
that.
Like this:
#(remote-include http://www.whatnote.com/style.ly; /tmp/whatnote-style.ly)
\include /tmp/whatnote-style.ly
For implementing remote-include a call to wget could be enough:
#(define remote-include
The subsubsubsections are not present in LM toc. Is this intentional?
Thanks,
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Yes, I'm talking about these headlines as in the NR they are included in
the toc.
Reinhold Kainhofer írta:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 29. Dezember 2008 01:01:14 schrieb Bertalan Fodor:
The subsubsubsections are not present in LM toc.
Which
Hi,
I found this in lilypond-book-preamble.ly:
(lambda ( . rest)
Besides that I can't imagine what that wants to mean, the GUILE doc
clearly says:
--- syntax: *lambda* formals body
|(|variable1| ... |variablen| . |variablen+1|)|
There must be at least one argument before the period.
a +1 function and change lily to use
it.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
lilypondt...@organum.hu wrote:
Hi,
I found that many places you use the procedure 1+. Besides that how
ridiculous I think is to have a function that spares a space (1+ instead
of (+ 1
No it, can't be. Think of Bb H in german etc.
Graham Percival wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 02:48:43PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Op dinsdag 16-12-2008 om 13:07 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Hans Aberg:
You need a font, though, and perhaps a special key map, too.
Now
But then why not use a font like this:
http://www.icogitate.com/~ergosum/fonts/musicfonts.htm
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Op dinsdag 16-12-2008 om 15:58 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Hans Aberg:
On 16 Dec 2008, at 14:48, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
You might call for using Unicode:
r16
I would have beaten the the world record of the 100m escaping out of
the music school if I would have had to say double bémol sol.
Nevertheless it is a matter of vocal cords, I still sing sol and not
fa...
Once a French conductor sang the melody a a gis a g fis g with the
words la la sol
Years ago I made a 4800dpi film in a printshop. It was surprisingly
different than a 600dpi laser-print.
So to make a fair comparison one should print pages with the same
professional technology and see.
Bert
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 12/14/08 11:45 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com
1. You can't fully parse LilyPond without actually running LilyPond. At
least you need a Scheme parser.
2. You should use the lexer.ll and parser.yy files for creating you own
parser.
Danalute wrote:
Willing to download, unroll, and RTFM, just, dont know where to start, a clue
or two would
You only need to
- create a messages_es.properties file besides the messages.properties, and
- create a LilyPondTool_es.props file containing the messages from the
LilyPondTool.props file.
- the LilyPondTool_es.props file shouldn't contain anything but localized
messages
- the localization
I think in this way this is a bad practice and I wouldn't call it German
tradition.
The best traditional practice is to use small letter and the quality mark
together: hm
Bert
The users would like to be able to make a minor chord print the chord
name as a small letter, and a big letter for
and I wouldn't call it German tradition.
So you mean it is wider spread?
Yes, for example Hungarian note and chord names usually follows the
German and I often saw this in various scores.
The best traditional practice is to use small letter and the quality mark
together: hm
What
LilypondTool works properly with JPedal under windows. As long as JPedal is
not the active window, the pdf can be properly written. If JPedal is the
active window, then you get a write error on the pdf.
Yes, because LilyPondTool has control over JPedal, so it closes the PDF
when you
As I know the stencil callback is unfortunately C code. So the valid
styles are only present in the C sources.
That's a drawback of the current documentation system.
Bert
Valentin Villenave wrote:
An additional question: are the spanner styles documented anywhere?
When I tried to answer
After I'm done with the new parser, I want to make a voting/survey among LPT
users: what they want.
Bert
--- Original Message ---
From: Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bertalan Fodor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08/03/05/, 18:21:50
Subject: Re: Julie: GUILE for Java
2008/3/5
Hi,
In the last 3 weeks I created the base for an R5RS Scheme interpreter
written in Java, aimed at GUILE compatibility. It is quite basic yet,
but I'm not very far from the point where I can start interpreting
LilyPond input files as they are. Actually module support is what I have
to
Han-Wen Nienhuys írta:
2008/3/4, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In the last 3 weeks I created the base for an R5RS Scheme interpreter
written in Java, aimed at GUILE compatibility. It is quite basic yet,
but I'm not very far from the point where I can start interpreting
Hi,
in property-init.ly I found this: aikenHeads = \set shapeNoteStyles =
##(do re mi fa #f la ti)
That seems to be a vector definition in Scheme: #(do re mi fa #f la ti)
However, it is not a valid Scheme expression, at least according to its
formal grammar and the online Scheme interpreter,
Yes, it's a vector, but is it a standalone expression?
The guile page says:
Like lists, vectors have to be quoted:
'#(a b c) = #(a b c)
--- Original Message ---
From: Nicolas Sceaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08/01/23/, 20:04:06
Ok, thanks, should I create patches for these cases - there are some in the
declarations? Anyway I wonder how guile could accept these.
Bert
--- Original Message ---
From: Nicolas Sceaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bertalan Fodor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08/01/23/, 21:45:25
Subject: Re
Valentin Villenave wrote:
Hi David, hi everybody.
David's feature request has been officially added as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=559
I'm both happy and sad to admit this request: I am happy to see that
people like David care about making LilyPond an even better
Actually java need not be installed. You can zip together the whole editor
distribution, and use it without any installing, but just unzipping.
So really it would involve creating a folder structure:
lilypondtool
-- jedit (containing all necessary plugins in the jars directory)
-- jre
pdf reader
You are always welcome to send patches, bug reports etc. on
http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/lily4jedit. The silly mix can remain
from the time when lilypond itself was a silly mix thanks to cygwin :-)
However, I'd suggest packaging a lightweight gpl text editor with syntax
highlighting
How does JEdit and JLilyTool solve autocompletion for example?
Autocompletion is very simple - only finds a regex at the cursor
position, and then finds the possible choices only based on the
Documentation. So if you move an engraver to an other context, the
autocompletion will not find it.
I propose (at least in windows) to leave a part of the program
resident so that invocation are less painful.
Unless it is being swapped out to the virtual memory.
Office and OpenOffice do
They are swapped out as well. And you gain nothing.
Bert
Well, in the case of LilyPond it is sure, that we can achieve better
performance if all the declaration, font and everything stuff is not
loaded each time.
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
LilyPond's bundled python is useless (unless something has changed in
the past 6 months), so I don't see why it is still bundled.
It is needed an perfectly good to run convert-ly.
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
I don't think that lilypond path should be in the PATH.
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Of course it should, but probably not the current \bin\ folder
Why? On Windows platforms people rarely use the PATH to run programs.
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Putting these into the path would also not help.
- you can not run convert-ly.py
- you must use python convert-ly.py - But if you do, you must say:
python c:\program files\lilypond\usr\bin\convert-ly.py So you didn't
gain much.
Still I don't see it is useful.
Perhaps we should look at the
I was thinking a bit more. Installing and uninstalling LilyPond itself
should remain separate from jEdit. So there should be one installer that
separately installs the two.
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Don't talk nonsense! It works perfectly well to run commands like
convert-ly -e myfile.ly
from the command prompt.
Wow, sorry. I never thought that. It seems that I must update my knowledge.
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
To understand what is going on I would like to start with the
following task I
have seen at the web site:
* * *
In addition, we are still looking for help with the following website
tasks,
* An overview of all editing environments available
* * *
Bertalan Fodor has offered to do
I think that's a bug in the validator :-)
Bert
Korneel írta:
This little note, only to say that your current homepage does NOT validate
through this URL: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer
Best wishes and please continue developping this wonderful software!
Korneel
Ok, I'm happy to do this. But what should I write about emacs, vim etc?
Should I write about configuration, or link to the manual?
Bert
So spend 30 minutes and create a general editor webpage for lilypond.
If you omit emacs or vim you'll probably have a riot, but you only
need one paragraph
1 - 100 of 226 matches
Mail list logo
