Hi,
I'm using version 2.0.8 and I tried to provide a highly-available squid
service. I wrote my own OCF script which was tested in two versions:
ver 1. 'Start' function started squid, waited a few seconds, then tried to
connect to port 8080, issued a HTTP request and returned either
$OCF
That's an awful lot of bad packets, it seems to me.
My best guess is that it's a hardware problem.
Having a look at all packets on the interface, I actually see these
errors not only for the heartbeat packets, but also for other (TCP and
UDP) packets. Plus, I also see them on another device (
Hi All,
We are using linux ha for achieving HA solution for a 2 node system. We have
observed memory leaks in the crmd process and seen it grow to beyond 700MB.
I am currently running 2.0.8 with a patch that fixes a few memory leak
issues in crmd. I am trying to use valgrind and efence to nail
Jaroslav Prodelal wrote:
> Hello!
>
>I'd like to ask you about running two HA systems (two heartbeats) on
> one machine. Is it posiblle?
>
>We'd like to setup 2-node clusters between 3 machines which should
> looks like that
>
>
> M1 - [HB1-2] - M2
>
>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 11:42 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 2007- 04- 12T09:21:02, Robert Wipfel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> But first, it's probably appropriate to comment on Novell's
>> contributions to open source software in gen
Dear Heartbeat user community -and Masters-,
I'm having many troubles making working a "simple" DRBD/NFS
Active/Passive config in a 2-node cluster as soon as I want to put
additional feature to increase the availability in case of network
failure : STONITH (suicide) and pingd (failover if the
Hello!
I'd like to ask you about running two HA systems (two heartbeats) on
one machine. Is it posiblle?
We'd like to setup 2-node clusters between 3 machines which should
looks like that
M1 - [HB1-2] - M2
/ \
[HB1-3]
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2007-04-12T08:05:29, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> So, if you would consider an R2/CRM/CIB configuration, it interacts with
>> STONITH in a completely different way, which might not be ideal either,
>> but it should start the other resources (you can
Hi All,
We are using linux ha for achieving HA solution for a 2 node system. We have
observed memory leaks in the crmd process and seen it grow to beyond 700MB.
I am currently running 2.0.8 with a patch that fixes a few memory leak
issues in crmd. I am trying to use valgrind and efence to nail
On 4/12/07, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2007-04-12T08:58:15, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >So I thought that probe is maybe never unset
> >>
> >> correct
> >
> >http://www.osdl.org/developer_bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1479
>
> lmb - not the same thing. the r
On 2007-04-12T09:21:02, Robert Wipfel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But first, it's probably appropriate to comment on Novell's
> contributions to open source software in general, and the Heartbeat
> project in particular. Everyone of course knows Lars and Andrew;
> the architect and lead developer
On 2007-04-12T08:05:29, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, if you would consider an R2/CRM/CIB configuration, it interacts with
> STONITH in a completely different way, which might not be ideal either,
> but it should start the other resources (you can _make_ it start the
> other reso
On 2007-04-12T08:58:15, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >So I thought that probe is maybe never unset
> >>
> >> correct
> >
> >http://www.osdl.org/developer_bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1479
>
> lmb - not the same thing. the resource is not deleted in between the
> two types of monito
Dominik Klein wrote:
> Hi
>
> I use heartbeat 2.0.7 from openSuSE 10.2
>
> 10.250.250.27 is master
> 10.250.250.28 is backup
> They are connected with direct ethernet cable
>
> When watching UDP heartbeats with tshark, my master machine says this
> (checksum errors):
> 16:27:24.140509 10.250.250
>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 7:58 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alan
Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sander van Vugt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just like to know your opinion about the following. A pure Linux shop
>> would of course definitely go for Heartbeat as the solution for high
>> av
Terry L. Inzauro wrote:
> Alan Robertson wrote:
>> Terry L. Inzauro wrote:
>>> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 4/11/07, Terry L. Inzauro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> list,
>
> this is a continuation of another thread that was started a few weeks
> back. the original thread was
>
Hi
I use heartbeat 2.0.7 from openSuSE 10.2
10.250.250.27 is master
10.250.250.28 is backup
They are connected with direct ethernet cable
When watching UDP heartbeats with tshark, my master machine says this
(checksum errors):
16:27:24.140509 10.250.250.28 -> 10.250.250.27 UDP Source port: 327
Alan Robertson wrote:
> Terry L. Inzauro wrote:
>> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> On 4/11/07, Terry L. Inzauro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
list,
this is a continuation of another thread that was started a few weeks
back. the original thread was
started in regards
to the set
Mark Eisenblaetter wrote:
> hi,
>
> i don't get used to the strukture of the site. I have to search a long
> time for partikulare informations. Wenn usinbg the search funktion the
> hits are of both versions.
>
> so i think that i don't find all informations on tis site
A lot of information appl
Benjamin Watine wrote:
> Andrew Beekhof a écrit :
>> On 4/11/07, Benjamin Watine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Alan Robertson a écrit :
>>> > Benjamin Watine wrote:
>>> >> Alan Robertson a écrit :
>>> >>> Benjamin Watine wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I'm trying to chmod 660 cib.xml to give
Martin wrote:
>> The only way to verify the configuration is to talk to it.
> Yes - and if there is a problem talking to it, heartbeat should complain
> loudly, but it should then continue to run and provide services. Currently
> it exits.
>
>> You surely
>> don't want to find out 2 years later
maike wrote:
> Hi people, i have a situation and
> Resource X is (potentially) active on 2 nodes
> How i can work is that?
Do you mean that you want it be active on two nodes?
Do you mean that we made it active on two nodes?
Do you mean that a system administrator made it active on two nodes?
D
Bernd Eichenberg wrote:
> Hi at all,
>
> I've to warn you, because I'm a newby at HA and I'm german
> with very small english skillz.
> Hope you understand my problem and thank for that.
>
> My Problem is, there is no failback after the 1.node is valid
> again.
> 1. node is Suse 8 with heartbeat
Sander van Vugt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just like to know your opinion about the following. A pure Linux shop
> would of course definitely go for Heartbeat as the solution for high
> availability. However, in an environment that comes from Novell's
> NetWare, Novell Cluster Services (NCS) would be the be
Terry L. Inzauro wrote:
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On 4/11/07, Terry L. Inzauro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> list,
>>>
>>> this is a continuation of another thread that was started a few weeks
>>> back. the original thread was
>>> started in regards
>>> to the setup of pingd. this thread is in r
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On 4/11/07, Terry L. Inzauro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> list,
>>
>> this is a continuation of another thread that was started a few weeks
>> back. the original thread was
>> started in regards
>> to the setup of pingd. this thread is in regards to pingd not being
>> able
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On 4/11/07, Terry L. Inzauro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> list,
>>
>> this is a continuation of another thread that was started a few weeks
>> back. the original thread was
>> started in regards
>> to the setup of pingd. this thread is in regards to pingd not being
>> able
Hi at all,
I've to warn you, because I'm a newby at HA and I'm german
with very small english skillz.
Hope you understand my problem and thank for that.
My Problem is, there is no failback after the 1.node is valid
again.
1. node is Suse 8 with heartbeat that came with.
2. node is debian 3 with
Oh - and I forgot... UI was _much_ nicer last time I looked. And nowhere
near as buggy as the HB GUI.
Yan Fitterer wrote:
> NCS has better integration with EVMS, and has data-network heartbeat. It
> does not therefore require STONITH.
>
> It has had much more testing than HB for large clusters as
NCS has better integration with EVMS, and has data-network heartbeat. It
does not therefore require STONITH.
It has had much more testing than HB for large clusters as well. 20+
node clusters are not uncommon.
Yan
Sander van Vugt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just like to know your opinion about the followi
On 4/11/07, Terry L. Inzauro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
list,
this is a continuation of another thread that was started a few weeks back.
the original thread was
started in regards
to the setup of pingd. this thread is in regards to pingd not being able to
start for whatever
reason and i susp
Andrew Beekhof a écrit :
On 4/11/07, Benjamin Watine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alan Robertson a écrit :
> Benjamin Watine wrote:
>> Alan Robertson a écrit :
>>> Benjamin Watine wrote:
Hi
I'm trying to chmod 660 cib.xml to give w/r access to hacluster and
haclient. I do it on
i hate to pester, but where are the "fail counts" kept track of and what
maintains
them?
they are stored in the status section and are maintained by the
tengine process (which increases it whenever a monitor action fails)
there is also a CLI tool called crm_failcount that can be used to view
a
On 4/11/07, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2007-04-10T18:29:10, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Apr 10 17:30:25 ha-test-1 process[26425]: Returnig 7
> >Apr 10 17:30:40 ha-test-1 process[26493]: Maintainance =
> >Apr 10 17:30:40 ha-test-1 process[26493]: OCF_RESKEY_
34 matches
Mail list logo
