Leon Brocard wrote:
Hello.
They are planning to auction the colour of search.cpan.org tonight at
OSCON. I hear that it is not going to be cheap. If you want to help me
make it orange and would like to pledge a small amount that'd be
wonderful. Emails offlist please.
Leon
Well, nothing per
On Thursday, Jul 10, 2003, at 13:35 US/Pacific, Luis Campos de Carvalho
wrote:
Leon Brocard wrote:
Hello.
They are planning to auction the colour of search.cpan.org tonight at
OSCON. I hear that it is not going to be cheap. If you want to help me
make it orange and would like to pledge a small
Hello.
They are planning to auction the colour of search.cpan.org tonight at
OSCON. I hear that it is not going to be cheap. If you want to help me
make it orange and would like to pledge a small amount that'd be
wonderful. Emails offlist please.
Leon
--
Leon Br
There seems to be an idea going round (see, for example,
http://search.cpan.org/orange.html) that it the whole of london.pm is
obscessed with the colour orange - rather than just one rogue member.
Had the auction been held at a reasonable time, I'm sure you would have
seen far more lond
yfish and my self spent 450 EUR to change
the colour of the website to Orange, with all money going
to YAPC::Europe (and then excess to YAS).
I would like to take this chance to say sorry... :)
Once again, I stress.. this is intentional.. it is
not a bug...
Thanks
Leo
Leon Brocard sent the following bits through the ether:
> They are planning to auction the colour of search.cpan.org tonight at
> OSCON
The auction was mad and crazy. There were two groups: the orange group
and the "keep it as it is" group. We started bidding at
$100. Increments
Leon Brocard wrote:
The auction was mad and crazy. There were two groups: the orange group
and the "keep it as it is" group. We started bidding at
$100. Increments of $25. Up up up, higher higher higher. It got
hectic, we got more money. Eventually, I made a bid of $1000. They
made a bi
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Leon Brocard wrote:
> However, in a gesture of good faith, Graham decided to let
> search.cpan.org be orange for one month. Thanks Graham!
It burns! It burns! I haven't seen anything that ugly since slashdot
released their games themed subsection[1]. I'l
S Watkins wrote:
> Some people just don't seem to have got the message that the DotCom Era
> is OVER! *grin*
It was a stupidly fun way of raising cash for The Perl Foundation. :-)
For this purpose, I copied and hacked on the search.cpan.org CSS stylesheet
and then paraded the orang
On Saturday, July 12, 2003, at 02:00 pm, Dave Cross wrote:
There seems to be an idea going round (see, for example,
http://search.cpan.org/orange.html) that it the whole of london.pm is
obscessed with the colour orange - rather than just one rogue member.
Had the auction been held at a
At 10:32 AM +0100 7/12/03, Mark Fowler wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Leon Brocard wrote:
However, in a gesture of good faith, Graham decided to let
search.cpan.org be orange for one month. Thanks Graham!
It burns! It burns! I haven't seen anything that ugly since slashdot
released their
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 10:32:10AM +0100, Mark Fowler wrote:
> [1] http://games.slashdot.org/ - remember your peril sensitive sunglasses
Can I just have bad-web-"design"-sensitive sunglasses. :-/
Oh, and I think that orange sucks on search.cpan.org too.
--
Lusercop.net - L
Lusercop wrote:
Can I just have bad-web-"design"-sensitive sunglasses. :-/
Lusercop, you're sounding like Jakob Nielsen (who you claim is full of
organic fertilizer) again:
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/2723.html # "the death of web design"
ti'
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Graham has said that he'd cut a day off the orange month for each
> $100 donated to TPF...
Yowza, that's a bit rich for my blood. I'll think I'll just change my
browser to use a custom style sheet (anyone know how to do
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Dave Cross wrote:
> On a similar note, I assume that Leon only won control of our web site
> for one year. I look forward to it returning to more pleasant colour in
> September :)
Like all things, after a year it's left open to whoever's in charge of
that after the time expir
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 11:50:41AM +0100, Mark Fowler wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Dave Cross wrote:
>
> > On a similar note, I assume that Leon only won control of our web site
> > for one year.
>
> As I stated when I took over leadership, I'm not going to fiddle with
> minor things, so it's up
On Sunday, July 13, 2003 2:56 pm +0100 Leo Lapworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, what with it being YAPC::EU in a couple of weeks, and Mr Greggy
will be running the auction I personally feel that it should be
reauctioned - I'm quite happy to impliment more than just a colour
change - Hmm.. lit
t them to change it back *right* *now*.
*>
*>Graham has said that he'd cut a day off the orange month for each
*>$100 donated to TPF...
Bah, give me 200 quid in cash over the weekend:)
It is unspeakably ugly. Maybe that guy who does web interface usability
studies can use it as an examp
* Leo Lapworth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 11:50:41AM +0100, Mark Fowler wrote:
> > On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Dave Cross wrote:
> >
> > > On a similar note, I assume that Leon only won control of our web site
> > > for one year.
> >
> > As I stated when I took over leadership,
On Monday, Jul 14, 2003, at 08:36 Europe/Amsterdam, Greg McCarroll
wrote:
you could have a nice sheep background image, tastefully faded of
course,
or a nice buffy background image. or perhaps stars and stripes,
draig goch or tricolore as the background.
of course someone could organise a bid to
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Leon Brocard wrote:
> Hello.
>
> They are planning to auction the colour of search.cpan.org tonight at
> OSCON. I hear that it is not going to be cheap. If you want to help me
> make it orange and would like to pledge a small amount that'd be
> wo
On Sun, 2003-07-13 at 15:32, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Sunday, July 13, 2003 2:56 pm +0100 Leo Lapworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well, what with it being YAPC::EU in a couple of weeks, and Mr Greggy
> > will be running the auction I personally feel that it should be
> > reauctioned - I'm
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 11:22:54PM +0100, will wrote:
> http://www.dazedsheep.co.uk/
Redirects to http://www.dazedsheep.co.uk/james/, which gives a Directory
Listing Denied error.
--
# Earle Martin http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?EarleMartin
$a="f695a9a2176a7dd1618af6649896e
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 05:22:35PM +0100, Leo Lapworth said:
> I'm sorry (or happy) to announce the London.pm website
> (http://london.pm.org/) has now changed colour.
OH GOD! MY EYES! IT BUURNS!
* Leo Lapworth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm sorry (or happy) to announce the London.pm website
> (http://london.pm.org/) has now changed colour.
>
> WE HAVE NOT BEEN HACKED!
>
> For those of you who did not hear...
>
> The colour of the website was put up for auction at
> this years YAPC::
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 05:22:35PM +0100, Leo Lapworth wrote:
> I'm sorry (or happy) to announce the London.pm website
> (http://london.pm.org/) has now changed colour.
> WE HAVE NOT BEEN HACKED!
This makes a change! :-)
*ducks and runs very fast*
--
Lusercop.net - LARTing Lusers everywhere si
>From: Simon Wistow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Orange website...
>Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 17:57:35 +0100
>
>On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 05:22:35PM +0100, Leo Lapworth said:
> > I'm sorry (or happy) to announce the London.pm website
> > (http://london.pm.o
On 24/09/2002 at 17:57 +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 05:22:35PM +0100, Leo Lapworth said:
>> I'm sorry (or happy) to announce the London.pm website
>> (http://london.pm.org/) has now changed colour.
>
>OH GOD! MY EYES! IT BUURNS!
http://london.pm.org/about/fa
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 21:48, Lusercop wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 05:22:35PM +0100, Leo Lapworth wrote:
> > I'm sorry (or happy) to announce the London.pm website
> > (http://london.pm.org/) has now changed colour.
> > WE HAVE NOT BEEN HACKED!
>
> This makes a change! :-)
robin's the only o
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Paul Mison wrote:
> I've taken the opportunity to change the style sheet, too, which should
> fix a couple of things people have (rightly) complained about
> accessibility-wise.
It's wrong all down the LHS in Moz 1.0. I presume Moz is supported?
S.
--
Shevek
I am the Borg
om a little more into the brown
zone I'm sure you could probably get Terry's (of Chocolate Orange fame)
to sponsor you :-)
Paul
PS The link and vlink colours are still way too close, IMO. I dunno if
it's a Mac gamma thing or someone's got bionic
Shevek sent the following bits through the ether:
> It's wrong all down the LHS in Moz 1.0. I presume Moz is supported?
There's a weird mozilla bug where it won't refresh the background
images of some cells. See if clearing your browser cache helps.
Leon
--
Leon Brocard
On 25/09/2002 at 02:24 +0100, Shevek wrote:
>On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Paul Mison wrote:
>
>> I've taken the opportunity to change the style sheet, too, which should
>> fix a couple of things people have (rightly) complained about
>> accessibility-wise.
>
>It's wrong all down the LHS in Moz 1.0. I pres
http://secretgeek.net/OrangeX.asp
I'm suspecting some people must have seen this before, but it was new to
me.
the hatter
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:16 PM, the hatter wrote:
> http://secretgeek.net/OrangeX.asp
>
> I'm suspecting some people must have seen this before, but it was new to me.
Refreshing (haha) to see - a pet peeve of mine is OS X apps with some
aqua-dominant coloring in their icons. Makes it harder to dis
It seems that orange is not just the key to internet success, but also
applies to the music business.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2009/sep/14/flame-haired-flavour-of-month
2009/9/14 Ian Knopke :
> It seems that orange is not just the key to internet success, but also
> applies to the music business.
>
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2009/sep/14/flame-haired-flavour-of-month
I guess it depends on your line of business. If your 'in the
37 matches
Mail list logo
