On 27 November 2010 08:27, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Thomas Backlund wrote:
>>
>> The idea of this layout with some of the separate sections (codecs,
>> firmware, games, non-free, debug_*) gives a mirror maintainer in a country
>> (or company) the option to exclu
2010/11/27 Andrey Borzenkov :
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Thomas Backlund wrote:
>>
>> The idea of this layout with some of the separate sections (codecs,
>> firmware, games, non-free, debug_*) gives a mirror maintainer in a country
>> (or company) the option to exclude the parts they lega
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Thomas Backlund wrote:
>
> The idea of this layout with some of the separate sections (codecs,
> firmware, games, non-free, debug_*) gives a mirror maintainer in a country
> (or company) the option to exclude the parts they legally (or by company
> policy) can not
Op zaterdag 27 november 2010 00:51:59 schreef Romain d'Alverny:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 00:44, Maarten Vanraes
>
> wrote:
> > Op zaterdag 27 november 2010 00:25:17 schreef Thomas Backlund:
> > [...]
> >
> >> > A) i see no reason for codecs and firmware to be separate. However, i
> >> > do unde
Op zaterdag 27 november 2010 00:51:59 schreef Romain d'Alverny:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 00:44, Maarten Vanraes
>
> wrote:
> > Op zaterdag 27 november 2010 00:25:17 schreef Thomas Backlund:
> > [...]
> >
> >> > A) i see no reason for codecs and firmware to be separate. However, i
> >> > do unde
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 00:44, Maarten Vanraes
wrote:
> Op zaterdag 27 november 2010 00:25:17 schreef Thomas Backlund:
> [...]
>> > A) i see no reason for codecs and firmware to be separate. However, i do
>> > understand that some people would not want to install firmware, but i
>> > think we shou
Op zaterdag 27 november 2010 00:25:17 schreef Thomas Backlund:
[...]
> > A) i see no reason for codecs and firmware to be separate. However, i do
> > understand that some people would not want to install firmware, but i
> > think we should do this in another way, (like installing a meta package
> >
Maarten Vanraes skrev 27.11.2010 01:02:
Op vrijdag 26 november 2010 22:43:31 schreef Renaud MICHEL:
On vendredi 26 novembre 2010 at 21:29, Thomas Backlund wrote :
Then we come to the "problematic" part:
--
x86_64
media
codecs (disabled by default)
co
On samedi 27 novembre 2010 at 00:02, Maarten Vanraes wrote :
> C) if they are separate, they cannot be disabled by default, some stuff
> is needed for stuff to work.
I guess you are talking about firmware here.
Maybe the installer could detect that a firmware is needed for some
hardware, then it
Op vrijdag 26 november 2010 22:43:31 schreef Renaud MICHEL:
> On vendredi 26 novembre 2010 at 21:29, Thomas Backlund wrote :
> > Then we come to the "problematic" part:
> > --
> > x86_64
> >
> > media
> >
> > codecs (disabled by default)
> > core (o
Renaud MICHEL skrev 26.11.2010 23:43:
On vendredi 26 novembre 2010 at 21:29, Thomas Backlund wrote :
Then we come to the "problematic" part:
--
x86_64
media
codecs (disabled by default)
core (old main+contrib)
backports (disabled by
On vendredi 26 novembre 2010 at 21:29, Thomas Backlund wrote :
> Then we come to the "problematic" part:
> --
> x86_64
> media
> codecs (disabled by default)
> core (old main+contrib)
>backports (disabled by default)
>b
Hi,
As we are getting closer to actually have something to mirror it's time
to get this decided.
And the deadline for theese discussions is December 5th, 2010 in
order to get a decision on the board meeting on December 6th, 2010.
Now this is a somewhat problematic topic but needs to be decide
Le vendredi 26 novembre 2010 à 06:49 -0500, Marc Paré a écrit :
> Le 2010-11-26 06:23, Ahmad Samir a écrit :
>
> >
> > You mean the "rumours" that Ubuntu will switch to a rolling distro
> > model?
> > http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Ubuntu-Rolling-release-rumours-wrong-1142040.html
> >
> >
Le 2010-11-26 06:23, Ahmad Samir a écrit :
You mean the "rumours" that Ubuntu will switch to a rolling distro
model?
http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Ubuntu-Rolling-release-rumours-wrong-1142040.html
(thanks to misc posting the link on IRC yesterday).
Yes. Thanks for the link and set
On 26 November 2010 12:21, Marc Paré wrote:
> Le 2010-11-26 03:14, Wolfgang Bornath a écrit :
>>
>> 2010/11/26 andre999:
>>>
>>> MIhail Papadopoulos a écrit :
Why not going down the right path: A rolling release cycle would be
simply
great. After all, this isn't a commerci
Le 2010-11-26 05:35, Oliver Burger a écrit :
Marc Paré schrieb am 2010-11-26
Do we have an archive list of the user mailist where we can refer people
to continue on that particular thread? Are the mailists archived?
https://www.mageia.org/pipermail/mageia-dev/20101009/001055.html
Merci Oliv
Marc Paré schrieb am 2010-11-26
> Do we have an archive list of the user mailist where we can refer people
> to continue on that particular thread? Are the mailists archived?
https://www.mageia.org/pipermail/mageia-dev/20101009/001055.html
--
http://www.mageia.org - Mageia, the magic continues
Le 2010-11-26 03:14, Wolfgang Bornath a écrit :
2010/11/26 andre999:
MIhail Papadopoulos a écrit :
Why not going down the right path: A rolling release cycle would be simply
great. After all, this isn't a commercial distribution, so it shouldn't be
a total noob Ubuntu-style mishmash.
Why ?
2010/11/26 andre999 :
> MIhail Papadopoulos a écrit :
>>
>>
>> Why not going down the right path: A rolling release cycle would be simply
>> great. After all, this isn't a commercial distribution, so it shouldn't be
>> a total noob Ubuntu-style mishmash.
>>
>
> Why ?
> What do you mean by "rolling"
20 matches
Mail list logo
