ecognise that rafa.eu.org sends good mail ...
But the basic problem remains; an AI has decided it doesn't like you.
Many bad guys spend significant amounts of time/money/effort trying to get
out of this AI's bad books, so it has defences again those who try to
persuade it to l
messages that passed DMARC authentication as well
as those that did not.
How often are you sending to the rua address ?
I doubt that you need to send summaries more than once per day.
Google doesn't advertise an "ruf" URI so do not wish to receive
individual failur
On Thu, 22 Aug 2019, Michael Rathbun via mailop wrote:
In our experience, if you mail to addresses that haven't engaged (subscribe,
open, click) in the previous 90 to 180 days, there is a growing tendency for
your IPs/domains to be classified as spammaceous and dealt with appropriately.
You ca
I can understand).
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Kendal, UK
and...@aitchison.me.uk
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
also keen to get to ssl-everywhere
and more likely to object to https -> http rejection.
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Kendal, UK
and...@aitchison.me.uk
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
h
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Simplelists - Andrew Beverley via mailop wrote:
Dear all,
I'm after some general advice about moving to a new outbound email IP
address range.
We have a choice of either applying for a brand new range from RIPE
(which has presumably never been used before to send email), or
sarily result in an overall "fail". (Better names for this
mechanism would have been "if-match", "on-match", etc.)
In practice this means that any "all" records in the include: are ignored.
--
Andrew C. Aitchison K
acklisted due to spamtrap addresses sneaking
into their distribution lists.
Is this deliberate enemy action or collateral damage ?
I'm finding it difficult to see why a general spam bot
would sign spam traps up to a mailing list,
so guess that I am missing somet
mail.
With single-sign-on I need to make it easy for users not to give the
alternate mail service (and their hackers :-) access to all the
services I provide, along with POP retrieval.
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Cambridge, UK
and...@aitchison.
chance that the certificate could be renewed ?
Thanks,
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Cambridge, UK
and...@aitchison.me.uk___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/m
arged by the click, not the view ?
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Cambridge, UK
and...@aitchison.me.uk
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
I agree that forwarding and distribution lists are the most likely
reasons.
Another common possibility is what exim calls local_part_prefix and
local_part_suffix, often adding a "+" and a tag to the local part of
the address, but I imagine that your operators would recognise those.
I personal
3rd-party reports
your defense falls apart.
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Cambridge, UK
and...@aitchison.me.uk
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
orts from google.
Your lawyers do not have to worry.
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Cambridge, UK
and...@aitchison.me.uk
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
It's clear that I'm NOT receiving Yahoo reports, I don't know why...
Are there special requirements to receive them?
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018, Andrew C Aitchison replied:
I recieve dmarc aggregate reports from Yahoo to the ruf addres
special requirements to receive them?
I recieve dmarc aggregate reports from Yahoo to the ruf address in my
_dmarc record; gmail sends forensic/failure reports to the rua address.
... Not exactly *special* requirements, but different, yes.
--
Andrew C. Aitchison
collects. If
retrieving a message (without visiting any of the links) will trigger some
modification to the local safe-sender list, I would consider this a serious
bug at the very least.
Wont a simple text MUA like mutt or (al)pine retrieve a message
without visiting any of the links ?
--
Andrew C
MX record (for envelope sender domain I guess)
as a marker for spaminess ?
(This *should* not matter in Rob's case as there will be an IPv4 MX record.)
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Cambridge, UK
an
, IMAP and webmail -
where you do disable TLS 1.0, just in case a TLS version of DROWN
shows up.
Also, does the MTA check the name in the certificate ?
I understand that not all do (or didn't until recently)
since you can't always determine what the name should be.
--
vide the same protection
for companies as it does for individuals, so I don't see how it
can affect role email addresses and registered corporate adddresses;
those should be able to stay in WHOIS.
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Cambridge, UK
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, Lyle Giese wrote:
I am unable to get to onmicrosoft.com(hosted exchange), doing a dig
+trace onmicrosoft.com ends up:
onmicrosoft.com. 86400 IN NS ns4.bdm.microsoftonline.com.
onmicrosoft.com. 86400 IN NS ns1.bdm.microsoftonline.com.
onmicrosoft.
POP3 password every time, or do they store it ?
I really, really don't like the idea of encouraging users
to give passwords to third parties.
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Cambridge, UK
and...@aitch
your messages
several hundred K bytes.
If you trim some of the historical messages I suspect that your
messages will get through.
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Cambridge, UK
and...@aitchison.me.uk
t ban you would
claim from your expert.
--
Andrew C Aitchison Cambridge, UK
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
ather than mine, but with ?any I am saying
that it definitely could be genuine.
I use forwarding and expect others to forward messages I send to their
users.
In the end I decided that SPF isn't really compatible with forwarding
and voted for a world with forwarding.
--
Andrew C Aitchison
___
ents as attachments rather than inlining them,
although options to switch between thse options would be helpful.
--
Andrew C Aitchison
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
On Tue, 1 Nov 2016, Jim Cheetham wrote:
Hi Mailop,
We run our listening mail servers with a maximum header size limit of 32768
(Sendmail's default).
We've found at least one "legitimate" sender whose headers are far bigger than
that,
and the reason for this isn't a very long path :-) it's al
time is 08/28/16 06:18. Error code:
SEC_ERROR_EXPIRED_CERTIFICATE
I saw that there was a problem with letsencrpt and available memory.
Any progress ?
Thanks,
--
Andrew C Aitchison Cambridge, UK
___
mailop mailing list
mailop
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
There is of course the other part that various freemails just
might not appreciate their customers sharing passwords with a
third party, like say an esp.
Just like Gmail's Mail Fetcher feature
https://support.google.com/mail/answer/21289?hl=e
onally, I really dislike looking at DMARC policy on mail that
doesn't already score as pretty spammy.
--
Dr. Andrew C. Aitchison
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
201 - 230 of 230 matches
Mail list logo
