On Sat, 25 Jun 2005, bofh wrote:
> I tried a newfs -m 1 /dev/wd3a. After newfs is over, wd3a is not mountable.
> fsck can't find any usable superblock. However, when I did a "newfs
> /dev/wd3a", the resulting partition checks out fine (fsck is ok with it) and
> mounts without problems. Any idea wh
Hi all,
I've been looking through all the upgrade notes etc and I can't see that
any major changes have occurred in the ppp daemon, nor the pppoe
translator that would cause me problems. However since I upgraded to
3.7 (from 3.4) I've been unable to connect to my ADSL providor.
My ppp.conf is t
Makes perfect sense now.
Thanks for the replies, guys!
On Jun 26, 2005, at 12:31 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Filesystem 512-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/wd0a 256252180540 6290074%/
256252 blocks less 5% reserve.
This gives 243440 blocks total
Filesystem 512-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/wd0a 256252180540 6290074%/
256252 blocks less 5% reserve.
This gives 243440 blocks total available for users.
less 180540 gives 62900 blocks currently available for users.
180540/243440 gives 7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>>> 490*0.05
24.5
>>> 490-24.5-32.8
432.69
Math looks to be spot on with a reserved 5%.
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 21:48:21 -0700 Matthew S Elmore
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It was my understanding that this reserved space was not accounted
>fo
It was my understanding that this reserved space was not accounted for
when using 'df'. Hence, you can sometimes have partitions that are 105%
capacity.
Am I off base on this? It is very possible, it is very late. ;)
From the FAQ sec 14.14:
People are sometimes surprised to find they have neg
Matthew S Elmore wrote:
> Can anyone explain this math to me?
>
> 490M - 32.8M != 433M
>
> Not that it's a big deal but just wondering where that bit of space went.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/matt$ df -h
> FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/wd0a 4
Whichever definition the 'df -h' command is using. I'm assuming it's
consistent in its use itself. ;)
On Jun 25, 2005, at 11:45 PM, Chris wrote:
Matthew S Elmore wrote:
Can anyone explain this math to me?
490M - 32.8M != 433M
Not that it's a big deal but just wondering where that bit of spa
5% or so is reserved for root and is not "available".
When everybody has run out of disk space, it is very helpful
if the situation does NOT apply to root.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Matthew S Elmore
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 11:35
Can anyone explain this math to me?
490M - 32.8M != 433M
Not that it's a big deal but just wondering where that bit of space
went.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/matt$ df -h
FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/wd0a 490M 32.8M433M 7%/
Hi,
Just bought a WDC 250G HD. Model WD2500JB-00G.
I tried a newfs -m 1 /dev/wd3a. After newfs is over, wd3a is not mountable.
fsck can't find any usable superblock. However, when I did a "newfs
/dev/wd3a", the resulting partition checks out fine (fsck is ok with it) and
mounts without problems.
Hi all,
I've been looking through all the upgrade notes etc and I can't see that
any major changes have occurred in the ppp daemon, nor the pppoe
translator that would cause me problems. However since I upgraded to
3.7 (from 3.4) I've been unable to connect to my ADSL providor.
My ppp.conf
If you replaced the Switch with the OpenBSD Firewall below,
then your routing issues will go away. It'll require work
on your end but after all is said and done, you won't need
to change anything or even rely on the hosts for their ability
or inability to understand advanced routing or any dhcp o
No, this is not what I was asking for. Of course, we can block
by OS but what I wanted to know was, how did Steve determine that
Linux hosts were causing him grief on the Netserver running 3.6 ?
I should have been clearer. Sorry about that. Thanks nevertheless.
Mark T. Uemura
OpenBSD Suppo
On June 25, 2005 2:58 pm, eric wrote:
> Has anyone seen this issue before?
>
> # ifconfig hme0
> hme0: flags=8063 mtu 1500
> address: 00:00:00:00:00:00
> description: public_if
> media: Ethernet 100baseTX full-duplex (100baseTX)
> status: active
> inet 10.9.9
Don't thank me just yet. I should've checked my notes.
On 6/25/05, Steve Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How about distributing static routes through DHCP? It's listed in
> > dhcp-options(5) as "option static-routes".
>
> OMG! What a simple solution! It's so simple it never occured to me
> Steve Williams wrote:
>
>>>On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:21:08 -0600 (MDT) Steve Williams
>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
This has worked until recently. One of the Hospital sites has put in a
CISCO Pix 506E and it's not behaving properly with ICMP redirects. If
I
put a static r
> On 6/25/05, Steve Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We narrowed it down by putting a static route on the Windows PC and it
>> worked flawlessly. I DO NOT want to try maintaining static routes on
>> 150+ PC's of various flavors...
>
> How about distributing static routes through DHCP? It's l
Hi!
Please forgive me if I missed something about the kernel pppoe but my initial
tests with the program were positive. However I noticed that when my ISP
disconnects the connection, it reauthenticates with a new IP and the default
route has to be set anew for the outgoing IP's to change. One ca
Has anyone seen this issue before?
# ifconfig hme0
hme0: flags=8063 mtu 1500
address: 00:00:00:00:00:00
description: public_if
media: Ethernet 100baseTX full-duplex (100baseTX)
status: active
inet 10.9.9.13 netmask 0xffe0 broadcast 10.9.9.31
$ arp -na
[s
Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.holland-consulting.net/obsd/aout-up.html
Just today a guy came up to the OpenBSD booth at LinuxTag (Karlsruhe,
Germany) and asked for help on remote updating of a client's 2.9(!)
systems located in Kansas(!). Apparently he doesn't read misc@
I'd like to give a big hoot and cheer Theo and the gang. The new
kernelized PPPoE is fast enough to keep up with two MMORPG instances,
three internet radio streams, and three large downloads combining for an
average of 130kb/sec all at once, while still being 30-50% idle! It
never even came c
Steve Williams wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:21:08 -0600 (MDT) Steve Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This has worked until recently. One of the Hospital sites has put in a
CISCO Pix 506E and it's not behaving properly with ICMP redirects. If I
put a static route on the Windows PC, it
I've had the same problem since 3.7 was released on all (vmware) machines
i've tried it on, i just copied floppy B conf over floppy C and it built
fine, I don't use the floppies anyway.
Brad
From: Raymond Lillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: floppy37C.fs image too big for
On 6/25/05, Steve Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We narrowed it down by putting a static route on the Windows PC and it
> worked flawlessly. I DO NOT want to try maintaining static routes on
> 150+ PC's of various flavors...
How about distributing static routes through DHCP? It's listed in
> On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:21:08 -0600 (MDT) Steve Williams
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This has worked until recently. One of the Hospital sites has put in a
>> CISCO Pix 506E and it's not behaving properly with ICMP redirects. If I
>> put a static route on the Windows PC, it works fine.
>
>>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
so spake Neta (netasys):
> Hello All,
> I have fresh install machine openbsd 3.7, i couldn't locate any /etc/crontab
> ?
> is this crontab disable by default?
> how i can enable it?
/etc/crontab is not used by default, it predates the availability
of per-us
>> the openbsd system will never be a "layer three switch", but
>> it doesn't need to be. it just needs to be a fancier router,
>> which is quite a reasonable thing to do.
>
> Can't you simply stick zebra on the OS to get advanced routing?
>
> -Bruno
>
Hi,
That's the problem, I don't understand "a
> the openbsd system will never be a "layer three switch", but
> it doesn't need to be. it just needs to be a fancier router,
> which is quite a reasonable thing to do.
Can't you simply stick zebra on the OS to get advanced routing?
-Bruno
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Steven Bowers wrote:
> Any comments on the Buslink drives? I found a site selling both 1.1
> and 2.0 drives for a some-what reasonable price. Seems like all the
> USB 2.0 stuff is 120GB or greater and $100 and up. Since I'm primarily
> backing up about 1MB of data I'm not sure
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:21:08 -0600 (MDT) Steve Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> This has worked until recently. One of the Hospital sites has put in a
> CISCO Pix 506E and it's not behaving properly with ICMP redirects. If I
> put a static route on the Windows PC, it works fine.
> The IT d
Hi,
Off Topic, but I'm struggling..
I have been contracted to make some network changes at a site I originally
set up 10 years ago. It started with a couple of PC's with an OpenBSD
server as the default gateway/firewall. As time went on, the site has
grown and now is 200+ computers and several
On 6/25/05, Mayuresh Kathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Following is what I did and what the system showed me in response:
> # mount_msdos /dev/sd0a /mnt/
> mount_msdos: /dev/sd0a on /mnt: Device not configured
> # newfs_msdos /dev/sd0a
> newfs_msdos: /dev/sd0a: Device not configured
>
> Which devi
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005, Diana Eichert wrote:
SNIP
> What does "disklable sd0" return?
>
> diana
aieh, need more kaffe.
that would be "disklabel sd0"
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I attached my 8Mb Disk-On-Key from M-Systems to my system running 3.6
>
> dmesg shows following output:
SNIP
> ohci0 at pci0 dev 19 function 0 "Compaq USB OpenHost" rev 0x06: irq
> 11, version 1.0, legacy support
> ohci0: SMM does not respond,
Hi,
I attached my 8Mb Disk-On-Key from M-Systems to my system running 3.6
dmesg shows following output:
OpenBSD 3.6 (GENERIC) #59: Fri Sep 17 12:32:57 MDT 2004
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Geode(TM) Integrated Processor by National Semi ("Geode by NSC"
586-cl
Hi,
> > On the Netserver I blocked Linux OS from accessing ssh port with PF
> > as I exclusively use OpenBSD and the problem did not
> > occur again but as mentioned it was replaced fairly shortly
> > afterwards.
>
> How did you figure this out? I'm curious.
block in log proto tcp from any os L
Ok guys, Finally i can find it :)
TIA
Neta
On 6/25/05, Schvberle Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not quite so.
>
> System crontab is located in /etc but doesn't exists by default.
> You have to make your own. Watch out for access rights or else
> crond won't parse it.
>
> man 5 crontab
>
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 06:12:55 -0500
> man crontab (from fresh OBSD 3.7)
> FILES
> /var/cron/cron.allow list of users allowed to use crontab
> /var/cron/cron.deny list of users prohibited from using crontab
> /var/cron/tabsdirectory of individual crontabs
man cron
Not quite so.
System crontab is located in /etc but doesn't exists by default.
You have to make your own. Watch out for access rights or else
crond won't parse it.
man 5 crontab
root's crontab is located in /var/cron/tabs.
Daniel.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAI
man crontab (from fresh OBSD 3.7)
FILES
/var/cron/cron.allow list of users allowed to use crontab
/var/cron/cron.deny list of users prohibited from using crontab
/var/cron/tabsdirectory of individual crontabs
I think there's a reason that they include the man
Hi,
I don't know if it's a bug or not, but you don't need to reinstall.
You could edit /etc/fstab and if needed "tar zxvfp base37.tgz" and others
Regards
Alex
2005/6/25, asdfasdf asfdasdfasdf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The nosuid thing is the only inconsistency I've
> noticed. Should I be concerned
At 09:40 PM 6/24/2005, Uwe Dippel wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:03:31 -0500, J.D. Bronson wrote:
> I too have this same problem.
>
> Fresh install...no custom anything...just trying to add modules to
> perl, and anything tried fails 100% no matter which source I use
> (even perl.org).
>
> Whats
The system (root) crontab is not stored in /etc but in /var/cron/tabs
like for everybody else. Edit the crontab with "crontab -e" as root
to change it, do not modify it directly.
Andreas
On 25/06/05, Neta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello All,
> I have fresh install machine openbsd 3.7, i could
Hello All,
I have fresh install machine openbsd 3.7, i couldn't locate any /etc/crontab ?
is this crontab disable by default?
how i can enable it?
Kind regards
Neta
On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 13:08 +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just got a new DSL connection from the local telephone company.
>
> I've observed something strange about the network behaviour.
>
> If I try to access any network service (FTP, HTTP, SSH) other than POP
> using standard too
FYI -
I was able to ssh2 vith vt320term using username/password to openbsd using
sprintpcs cellphone (not the fancy palm like ones but the newer lesser
vision phones that play media and midp java apps)
application on cellphone:
MidpSSH is an SSH and Telnet client for MIDP 1.0 / 2.0 devices
s
I'm not sure if this is a bug:
I just did a fresh 3.7 install on a sparc 64 machine
and my /usr partition was set to use nosuid by
default. This resulted in su not working for me.
I think I know what caused the problem to occur. When
I was partitioning my drive and specifying the mount
points I l
Hi,
I've just got a new DSL connection from the local telephone company.
I've observed something strange about the network behaviour.
If I try to access any network service (FTP, HTTP, SSH) other than POP
using standard tools (ftp, w3m/lynx, ssh) I am unable to access the
particular site unless
49 matches
Mail list logo