Hey, aren't we decided to use the advocacy list for this kind of threads?
You are funny folks, when you don't want us to discuss something here, you
tell go talk about this somewhere else, so we did.
Please follow your own suggestions. This current thread was split into 2,
one discussed here and
On Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 12:34:00PM -0800, Ed Phillips wrote:
>
> >The troll vanisheth!
>
> ha!
>
> Reminds me of the Zen story of an old fisherman in a boat on a lake in a heavy can't
>see your hands fog. He bumps into another boat, and shouts at the other guy, "Look
>where you're going would
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Barb and Tim wrote:
> It could really enhance your integrity if you also
> presented honest evaluations of the downsides of Perl.
> The promotion of Perl on this site is so ubiquitous and
> one sided, and Perl has such a bad reputation in many ways,
> that somebody like me has
>The troll vanisheth!
ha!
Reminds me of the Zen story of an old fisherman in a boat on a lake in a heavy can't
see your hands fog. He bumps into another boat, and shouts at the other guy, "Look
where you're going would you! You almost knocked me over." He pulls up beside the
boat and is abo
The troll vanisheth!
- Transcript of session follows -
... while talking to mc5.law5.hotmail.com.:
>>> RCPT To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<<< 550 Requested action not taken:user account inactive
550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown
According to Barb and Tim:
> It could really enhance your integrity if you also
> presented honest evaluations of the downsides of Perl.
Perl has two downsides. One is the start-up time for
the program and mod_perl solves this for web pages.
> The promotion of Perl on this site is so ubiquitous
Barb and Tim wrote:
>
> It could really enhance your integrity if you also
> presented honest evaluations of the downsides of Perl.
WHy don't you start.
-jwb
Gunther's right, my apologies to all. I shall now disembowel myself with
my IBM flowcharting template if I can find it. (Joke, really, a joke,
not more sarcasm...).
Rgds.
Rod Butcher
Gunther Birznieks wrote:
>
> Sarcastic responses do not help, regardless of how you feel about the
> original po
Hi there,
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Barb and Tim wrote:
> honest evaluations of the downsides of Perl
Thanks for the note, and welcome. I'm not sure the mod_perl list is
quite the place for this as a topic, so you other list readers might
want to hit `D' now. The list is primarily for discussions
> It could really enhance your integrity if you also
> presented honest evaluations of the downsides of Perl.
> The promotion of Perl on this site is so ubiquitous and
> one sided, and Perl has such a bad reputation in many ways,
> that somebody like me has a hard time swallowing the sunny
> progn
So, present us all with a detailed analysis of all Perl's failings and
its bad reputation compaired the competition, so that we may see the
light and turn to the true path. Until then we'll all stagger along
happily in the darkness.
Even better, write your own language like Larry did and see how m
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Barb and Tim wrote:
> It could really enhance your integrity if you also
> presented honest evaluations of the downsides of Perl.
> The promotion of Perl on this site is so ubiquitous and
> one sided, and Perl has such a bad reputation in many ways,
> that somebody like me ha
Barb and Tim wrote:
> full honesty. The language itself is hard enough to swallow.
How is Perl hard to swallow? Perl is so easy and flexible.
Stephen
13 matches
Mail list logo
