::
:: I understand that lame --decode basically uses mpglib/mpg123 for decoding,
:: but I'd like to know if lame's version differs from the original mpg123 (i.e.
:: bugfixes and the like).
::
:: Are there differences in the quality of the decoders? I read about the bugs
:: on the page men
Steve Lhomme schrieb am Die, 25 Jul 2000:
> Were these bug fixes proposed to the mpg123 CVS / dev team ?
>
> > Yes, LAME/mpglib has some bug fixes from the original mpg123/mpglib.
> > Mostly fixes in the 'scfsi' feature, which is used by MP3's produced
> > by LAME and Xing.
plus some minor table
Were these bug fixes proposed to the mpg123 CVS / dev team ?
> Yes, LAME/mpglib has some bug fixes from the original mpg123/mpglib.
> Mostly fixes in the 'scfsi' feature, which is used by MP3's produced
> by LAME and Xing.
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
>
> Hi.
>
> On Die, 25 Jul 2000, Roel VdB wrote:
> >best use "lame --decode", as it's the only correct decoder around
> >(check that decoding site) (but it makes no difference here)
>
> What is wrong with mpg123 -w ? Or was "only" meant in a way that encompasses
> only the windows-world?
>
>
Hi.
On Die, 25 Jul 2000, Roel VdB wrote:
>best use "lame --decode", as it's the only correct decoder around
>(check that decoding site) (but it makes no difference here)
What is wrong with mpg123 -w ? Or was "only" meant in a way that encompasses
only the windows-world?
I understand that lame -
Hello andrew,
Tuesday, July 25, 2000, 12:19:20 AM, you wrote:
ac> When decoding mp3s to .wav (1) and using Cool Edit's Spectral View (2), to my
ac> surprise I've noticed an obvious treble cut beyond 16KHz on VBR mp3s (3) I've
ac> encoded with LAME. Is this intentional?
How many different music
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 01:48:48AM +0200, Frank Klemm wrote:
> :: When decoding mp3s to .wav (1) and using Cool Edit's Spectral View (2), to my
> :: surprise I've noticed an obvious treble cut beyond 16KHz on VBR mp3s (3) I've
> :: encoded with LAME. Is this intentional?
>
> Upper frequency l
:: When decoding mp3s to .wav (1) and using Cool Edit's Spectral View (2), to my
:: surprise I've noticed an obvious treble cut beyond 16KHz on VBR mp3s (3) I've
:: encoded with LAME. Is this intentional?
::
Upper frequency limit depends on the average bit rate.
It sounds better to reduce hi
When decoding mp3s to .wav (1) and using Cool Edit's Spectral View (2), to my
surprise I've noticed an obvious treble cut beyond 16KHz on VBR mp3s (3) I've
encoded with LAME. Is this intentional?
Fortunately CBR mp3s (4) do not appear to suffer the same audio degredation.
See http://homepages.i