David, 2001-Jul-17 12:31 +1000:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, John P. Verel wrote:
> > My experience is that procmail is well worth the modest effort to
> > learn it. You can easily pick up sample recipes that you'll see are
> > really pretty straight forward. John On 07/16/01, 07:31:49PM +0200,
> *Snip
* Paul Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Sure... don't bother with line counts. Just change your index_format to
> show the size of the message instead.
Interesting. Although I like the linecount better, I think. It gives me a
better picture of the length of a message at first glance. Perhaps that
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, John P. Verel wrote:
> My experience is that procmail is well worth the modest effort to
> learn it. You can easily pick up sample recipes that you'll see are
> really pretty straight forward. John On 07/16/01, 07:31:49PM +0200,
*Snip*
> > I ment sorting to different folders
On Monday, Jul 16, 2001, Drew Raines wrote:
> Okay, so I want to use maildirs. I can use the procmail hack to add the
> Lines header for incoming messages. What about outgoing messages? Can I
> pipe to safecat or a wrapper from a send-hook command? The manual didn't
> really suggest this, so
My experience is that procmail is well worth the modest effort to learn
it. You can easily pick up sample recipes that you'll see are really
pretty straight forward.
John
On 07/16/01, 07:31:49PM +0200, Lukasz Zamel wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 06:16:08PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>
Okay, so I want to use maildirs. I can use the procmail hack to add the
Lines header for incoming messages. What about outgoing messages? Can I
pipe to safecat or a wrapper from a send-hook command? The manual didn't
really suggest this, so I figured it's not recommended.
Anybody have anothe
on Wed,11 Jul 2001, Mr. Wade wrote:
> Anthony Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would just like to find out if its possible in mutt to setup so that
> > if you use a signature file, the signature is added to the top of the
> > email, rather than the bottom of the email below the persons origi
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 06:16:08PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Pradeep [16/07/01 05:35 -0700]:
> > You can use something like procmail to do this visit www.procmail.org for
> > FAQs on how to go about it or visit http://symonds.net/~pradeep/linux.htm
> > this is how i did learn how to
Thus spake Alexander Skwar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > I'm curious, what's the MUA?
>
> Mail
> User
> Agent
> -> mutt in this case
I think he means what's the one that's mangling the quotes...
-Justin
--
[ ] -- Justin R. Miller - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [ ]
[ ] -- see full headers for PGP key infor
So sprach »Sam Roberts« am 2001-07-16 um 13:06:37 -0400 :
> Quoting Chris Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, who wrote:
> > I currently get mail from a MUA that simply chops all lines beyond
> > 80 characters to the nearest word. For unquoted text that's okay,
>
> I'm curious, what's the MUA?
Mail
User
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:00:09PM -0500, David Champion ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 2001.07.16, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Chris Fuchs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >Then, when you'd like to reformat text, highlight it in visual mode and
> > >hit 'gq' and it should wrap nicely.
>On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:00:09PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> Thanks, looks like I'll add vim to my mutt learning curve.
>
>Are you already using vim? No reason to start, just to get word wrap.
>par (under vi) handles this, and I'd be shocked -- shocked, I tell you
>-- if emacs does not.
Sho
On 2001.07.16, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Chris Fuchs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Then, when you'd like to reformat text, highlight it in visual mode and
> >hit 'gq' and it should wrap nicely. That's what I do, anyway...
> >
>
> Thanks, looks like I'll add vim to my mutt learning cu
>On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:39:15PM -0400, Justin R. Miller wrote:
>Thus spake Chris Fuchs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
>> Does anyone else get mail thus mutilated and how do you handle it?
>
>Use this in your .muttrc:
>
> set editor="vim -c 'set tw=72 comments=nb:>'"
>
>Then, when you'd like to
Thus spake Chris Fuchs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Does anyone else get mail thus mutilated and how do you handle it?
Use this in your .muttrc:
set editor="vim -c 'set tw=72 comments=nb:>'"
Then, when you'd like to reformat text, highlight it in visual mode and
hit 'gq' and it should wrap
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:06:37PM -0400, Sam Roberts wrote:
>Quoting Chris Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, who wrote:
>> I currently get mail from a MUA that simply chops all lines beyond
>> 80 characters to the nearest word. For unquoted text that's okay,
>
>I'm curious, what's the MUA?
MS Exchange
Quoting Chris Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, who wrote:
> I currently get mail from a MUA that simply chops all lines beyond
> 80 characters to the nearest word. For unquoted text that's okay,
I'm curious, what's the MUA?
Sam
--
Sam Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello,
I currently get mail from a MUA that simply chops all lines beyond
80 characters to the nearest word. For unquoted text that's okay,
but for quoted lines you get something like this:
> extreme silliness that should not be dealt this way but is for
whatever reason.
> On t
On a lark I installed the Ximian Gnome desktop yesterday, on top of a
prexisting KDE install (RH7.0, mutt 1.2.5i). Now everything is FUBAR.
Most of the problems are OT, but what would cause mutt to suddenly go
haywire in this fashion: in the index, the key stopped working
(it wouldn't bring up t
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 09:20:36AM +0200, Byrial Jensen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 08:22:09 +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote:
> > I upgraded from 1.2.5i to 1.3.19i and the only awkward thing I find is that
> > all question now goes ([yes] / no) and if i type 'n' it interprets as a YES,
> > and I k
In the .muttrc I have:
set sort=threads sort_aux=reverse-score
in order to get the highest rated messages at the end while still seeing
threads. However this has the unfortunate side effect that
identically-scored messages are more or less sorted from newest to
oldest (not the default date-sent)
Pradeep [16/07/01 05:35 -0700]:
> You can use something like procmail to do this visit www.procmail.org for
> FAQs on how to go about it or visit http://symonds.net/~pradeep/linux.htm
> this is how i did learn how to filter my messages.
If all you want to do is to sort mail within a folder, the
Hi,
You can use something like procmail to do this visit www.procmail.org for
FAQs on how to go about it or visit http://symonds.net/~pradeep/linux.htm
this is how i did learn how to filter my messages.
Reg,
- Pradeep.
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Lukasz Zamel wrote:
> Hello,
> is it possible to confi
Hello Lukasz!
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 Lukasz Zamel wrote:
> Hello, is it possible to configure Mutt to automatically sort
> incoming mail? Something like Sorting Office. Maybe it's explained
> some ware already.
I'm not quite sure what yo mean with sorting mail.
In mutt "sorting" means that you can
Hello,
is it possible to configure Mutt to automatically sort incoming mail? Something like
Sorting Office. Maybe it's explained some ware already.
--
Lukasz Zamel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reg. Linux User: #202048
On 2001-07-16 at 09:56:48Z, Byrial Jensen wrote:
> 1) The time format is ambiguous because it doesn't include timezone
>information. As it is, it will use the origininal sender's timezone
>(the question was sent at 10:16 your local time). It would have
>been mine local time if I had us
Byrial Jensen [mutt-users] <16/07/01 09:56 +0200>:
> At 07/11/01 10:16, Jeff Coppock wrote:
> >I'm having trouble figuring out the date format for my
> >attribution line. I want it to show as or
> >something a lot shorter than the default. Can someone provide
> >this for me?
At 07/11/01 10:16, Jeff Coppock wrote:
>I'm having trouble figuring out the date format for my
>attribution line. I want it to show as or
>something a lot shorter than the default. Can someone provide
>this for me?
I typed this command before sending this reply:
set attribution
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 08:22:09 +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote:
> I upgraded from 1.2.5i to 1.3.19i and the only awkward thing I find is that
> all question now goes ([yes] / no) and if i type 'n' it interprets as a YES,
> and I keep forgetting pressing 'N'
Do you happen to use OpenBSD? We just had
29 matches
Mail list logo
