On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 11:45:42AM -0500 I heard the voice of
Ricardo SIGNES, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> The question of which is right is probably flame material. We both have our
> reasons to say we're right. Based on something like Bach's "Design of the UNIX
> Operating System," the kernel i
begin quoting what Patrik Modesto said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 10:24:42AM +0100:
> I create new message, then to the first empty line under header i write
> http://www.something.com and send this mail. This address is send as a
> part of email's header and body of this mail is empty. Why? Is this
begin quoting what Sven Guckes said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 07:53:12AM +0100:
>
> and i wonder whether there is a
> way to make mutt's reply command
> use the filtered text for quoting..
Ok, you want them to vanish for viewing, and vanish for quoting.
Why is it that you don't use procmail to s
begin quoting what David T-G said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 04:14:23PM -0500:
>
> Are there just one or two, or are there a bunch, or does anyone really
> know? Do the servers in a given network synchronize with each other, or
> do even they have problems?
I think there are a few, and some of th
begin quoting what [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 09:11:12AM -0800:
> always be right. But I have recieved some email where an RTF file
> has a '.doc' extension and an 'application/msword' mime type (probably
> because of the extension). Other than educating the other user,
> wh
Shawn, et al --
...and then Shawn McMahon said...
%
% begin quoting what Martin Karlsson said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 12:36:32PM +0100:
% > >
% > And I get the same as David. I use 'keyserver pgp.mit.edu'.
% > But you should only have to upload to _one_ keyserver, right?
%
% There's more than
begin quoting what mike ledoux said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 10:27:37AM -0500:
>
> and hand out an invalid key. This is a known problem in the keyserver
> code. You can get a *valid* copy of my key from:
>
> http://www.volta.dyndns.org/~mwl/pgpkey.asc
Yep, worked peachy. Thanks.
> As st
begin quoting what Martin Karlsson said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 12:36:32PM +0100:
> >
> And I get the same as David. I use 'keyserver pgp.mit.edu'.
> But you should only have to upload to _one_ keyserver, right?
There's more than one keyserver network.
However, it's easier to ask somebody what
begin quoting what Magnus Bodin said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 06:29:44AM +0100:
>
> Wouldn't it be a better solution to keep the whole sent-mail-folder
> encrypted to using the open/close-hook-thingies in the
> compressed-folders-patch?
Probably be easier to put ~/Mail on a cfs filesystem.
I've got an strange problem which keeps my from executing rm -rf
/xtrn/c/windows as would be desired. I've spent a couple of days looking for
info and support elsewere, so, please, excuse me if you're tired of the same
lame question/problem. Let's give some info on it:
I thing my locale settings
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 09:11:12AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I know how to read Word and RTF files using things like catdoc, unrtf,
> and so on. But all of these do either Word or RTF but not both.
> In an ideal world the MIME type and the filename extension would
> always be right. But
28-Mar-02 at 09:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> I know how to read Word and RTF files using things like catdoc, unrtf,
> and so on. But all of these do either Word or RTF but not both.
> In an ideal world the MIME type and the filename extension would
> always be right. But I
On 020328, at 00:15:42, Sven Guckes wrote
> * Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 23:05]:
> > On Mar 27, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > > There is no way to remove a message-hook, is there?
> > unhook message-hook
> > This removes all message-hooks currently
> > defined, but
I know how to read Word and RTF files using things like catdoc, unrtf,
and so on. But all of these do either Word or RTF but not both.
In an ideal world the MIME type and the filename extension would
always be right. But I have recieved some email where an RTF file
has a '.doc' extension and an
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 07:47:29AM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote:
> Mike Schiraldi wrote:
> > > > Except that Linux is only the kernel. Linux + GNU + some other files and
> > > > configuration is the OS. That, plus some applications is the distribution.
> > >
> > > You're wrong.
> >
> > How is h
> > Except that Linux is only the kernel. Linux + GNU + some other files and
> > configuration is the OS. That, plus some applications is the distribution.
>
> You're wrong.
How is he wrong?
msg26360/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> apropos:
> anyone have a utility to calculate the
> number of days between two given dates?
> i mean - easily? no perl script
> with dozens of modules, please!
I'd do this, assuming you have the GNU version of date:
#! /bin/sh
expr \( `date -d "$2" +%s` - `date -d "$1" +%s` \) / 86400
This a
Mike Schiraldi wrote:
> > > Except that Linux is only the kernel. Linux + GNU + some other files and
> > > configuration is the OS. That, plus some applications is the distribution.
> >
> > You're wrong.
>
> How is he wrong?
In the computer science sense, an operating system is the piece of
s
* Mike Schiraldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-28 10:42]:
> > > Except that Linux is only the kernel. Linux + GNU + some other
> > > files and configuration is the OS. That, plus some applications
> > > is the distribution.
> >
> > You're wrong.
>
> How is he wrong?
I was wondering that too; h
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 07:53:12AM +0100, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-28 03:39]:
> > On Mar 28, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > > [-- Attachment #2 --]
> > > [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 0.2K --]
> > >
> > > that i
On Mar 28, Jeremy Blosser [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Is filter-message seeing the message after the attachment color is applied?
s/filter-message/display-filter
must not mail before 9am.
msg26355/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
* John Buttery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-28 04:07:05 -0600]:
> Can you tell us your...
>
> ... $pgp_getkeys_command?
> ... make and model of crypto software?
> ... keyserver hostname?
And of course it didn't occur to me to provide mine :p
I'm using GPG 1.0.6 with a keyserver wwwkeys.u
On Mar 28, John Buttery [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> >* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02/03/28 07:58]:
> >> well, I had tried to delete
> >> those lines with sed pattern
> >> /^\[-- .* --\]$/d
> >> but it did not work.
> >>
> >> however, using the
> >> following sed pattern
> >> makes them g
> That's odd, I get the same thing as Shawn:
Yep, weird. Like David, I have no problem with his sig.
> Can you tell us your...
> ... $pgp_getkeys_command?
pgp_getkeys_command=""
Whenever gpg encounters a new key, it fetches it automatically.
> ... make and model of crypto software?
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 11:44:27PM +0100, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 18:55]:
> > * On 2002.03.27, in <20020328002936.GA2447@blackscarab>,
> > * "cruciatuz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > i had some complaints, that mutt(?) sets
> > > the wrong date in
Simon, et al --
...and then Simon White said...
%
% 28-Mar-02 at 05:03, John Buttery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
% > --
% > this broken sig script is really starting to itch
%
% Are you on the way to fixing it, or do you need help? I'm starting to feel
% sorry for your poor script, since I jus
* John Buttery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-28 04.07 GMT -0600]:
[...snip...]
> That's odd, I get the same thing as Shawn:
>
> gpg: Signature made Wed 27 Mar 2002 02:29:20 PM CST using DSA key ID 57C3430B
> gpg: requesting key 57C3430B from wwwkeys.us.pgp.net ...
> gpg: key 57C3430B: invalid su
28-Mar-02 at 05:03, John Buttery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> --
> this broken sig script is really starting to itch
Are you on the way to fixing it, or do you need help? I'm starting to feel
sorry for your poor script, since I just got mine working OK...
...incidentally mine is very basic, ju
Sven, et al --
...and then Sven Guckes said...
%
% * A. Reinhold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 06:44]:
% > When selecting messages with the cursor (bar) in the index to tag
% > them or do anything else, the index scrolls one message line
% > further if the end of the display is reached. Now wh
* Patrik Modesto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-28 10:24:42 +0100]:
>Hi!
>I use Mutt 1.3.27i (2002-01-22) from Debian testing.
>
>I create new message, then to the first empty line under header i write
>http://www.something.com and send this mail. This address is send as a
>part of email's header an
* Thomas Huemmler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-28 08:55:45 +0100]:
>* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02/03/28 07:58]:
>> well, I had tried to delete
>> those lines with sed pattern
>> /^\[-- .* --\]$/d
>> but it did not work.
>>
>> however, using the
>> following sed pattern
>> makes them go
* tim lupfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 22:06:08 -0600]:
>* thus spaketh Sven Guckes (Mar 28 at 03:37AM):
>
>> but - is there a way I can just *hide*
>> the pgp sig *completely* from view?
>
>mutt reads mail--stripping pgp sigs is the job of procmail or the
>like <-- sorry, couldn't resist :P
Hi!
I use Mutt 1.3.27i (2002-01-22) from Debian testing.
I create new message, then to the first empty line under header i write
http://www.something.com and send this mail. This address is send as a
part of email's header and body of this mail is empty. Why? Is this
correct?
Patrik
msg26343
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 15:40:46 -0500]:
>Shawn, et al --
>
>...and then Shawn McMahon said...
>%
>% begin quoting what mike ledoux said on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:29:20PM -0500:
>%
>% gpg: requesting key 57C3430B from wwwkeys.us.pgp.net ...
>% gpg: key 57C3430B: invalid sub
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 07:13:40 -0500]:
> % Here's what the default account-hook entry looks like now:
> %
> % account-hook . 'unset imap_user ; set folder=~/Mail'
>
> Hmmm... Well, if it isn't setting $folder then I bet it's not being
> triggered at all. You're not really
35 matches
Mail list logo
