The upside to this is that if you are a hacker, you can now
legitimize your activities and legally protect yourself by
spending $30 to incorporate as a record company.
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 12:40:51 -0400
> From: Marshall Eubanks <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Huopio Kauto wrote:
> Interesting how quietly one of the powerhouses in Europe has been shut
> down yesterday evening. Any notes on increased latency / routing issues
> wrt AS286 shutdown?
Does anyone know what happened to the Ebone/KPNQWEST European-wide DWDM
system? I fi
Interesting how quietly one of the powerhouses in Europe has been shut
down yesterday evening. Any notes on increased latency / routing issues
wrt AS286 shutdown?
--kauto
Kauto Huopio - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Information Security Adviser
Finnish Communications Regulatory Authority / CERT-FI
tel. +35
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Simon Lockhart wrote:
> I'm currently using the 15454 to wavelength convert OC48 signals, but have
> not to date seen a black-box wavelength convertor - I would also be interested
> to know if such a beast exists. I think if you want to do this, you're stuck
> with the Metro
On Wed Jul 24, 2002 at 11:02:21AM -0400, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
> First, has anyone had experience with ITU Grid Optic GBICs? Do they even
> exist?
Cisco sell "CWDM" GBICs, which are sort of on ITU wavelengths, but with a
wider spacing. I've not tried them to see if I can use them with the 15216
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Shawn Solomon wrote:
> One common solution is a hash based on the cpe site name or some other
> unique key provided by the cpe information (address, ph #, etc).
> Changing the hash occasionally provides new passwords, and it is all
> easily scripted..
Most burglar alarms in
Does anyone know of work done (from a network operations point of view
rather than from a solar science point of view) that correlates errors on
the copper part of networks, and/or machines in datacenters, with sunspot
activity?
scott
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Andy Ellifson wrote:
:
: For an
Also check http://www.maj.com/sun/ for current solar info...nice site..
>>There are many places to get more information about sunspots. Being an
>>amateur radio operator who likes HF communications, I have a bit of an
>>interest in the topic.
>>
>>The most succinct monitoring and information s
The BSA is even flexing it's muscles here in the GWN.
http://www.istop.com/BSALetter.txt
Although they seem to have lots of money for scanning services and
lawyers, they expect ISPs to provide services (assisting them enforce
their copyrights) for free.
Ralph Doncaster
principal, IStop.com
If it starts happening, just unplug whoever's doing it and treat them like
a DDOSer...poof, you just lost your Internet connectivity.
Something Sony or MCA would love to have happen...huh?
Sorry, your'e causing malicious problems on the Internet, operational
procedure requires us to disable you
On 7/24/02 11:31 AM, "Adam Rothschild" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2002-07-24-14:10:00, James Thomason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If this legislation is passed, they certainly will earn Null0 on
>> mine.
>
> Unless, of course, the RIAA, MPAA, and friends carry out their
> cracking thr
> Just curious as to what people are using for metrics in their IGP
> and what their reasons are; bandwidth? geographical distance? latency?
We have a survey paper on techniques for setting IGP weights
http://www.research.att.com/~jrex/papers/ieeecomm02.ps
http://www.research.att.com/~jrex/
On 2002-07-24-14:10:00, James Thomason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If this legislation is passed, they certainly will earn Null0 on
> mine.
Unless, of course, the RIAA, MPAA, and friends carry out their
cracking through throw-away dial and DSL accounts, like they
purportedly use now to troll fo
Agreed here. Has this even got a bill number yet?
On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 13:15, Derek Samford wrote:
>
>
> I second that. If I see any of my clients having any sort of malicious
> activity directed at them, then there is no chance of me allowing their
> traffic through. I would be more than
--On Tuesday, July 23, 2002 10:11 PM -0700 Andy Ellifson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ( CORRECTED ) MAJOR SUNSPOT ACTITVITY
I passed this on to a neighbor for comment wrt 802.11b. His response
appears below:
> These blackouts generally affect communications in the HF (high frequenc
I second that. If I see any of my clients having any sort of malicious
activity directed at them, then there is no chance of me allowing their
traffic through. I would be more than happy to send all their traffic to
packet hell. Large corporations do not get any special consideration if
it comes
Would malicious actions on the part of copyright holders violate the
AUP of most networks? Or are service providers more willing to tolerate
denial of service attacks by large corporations than say, spam?
If this legislation is passed, they certainly will earn Null0 on mine.
Regards,
James T
Steve,
Hope this info helps answer your questions about QoS, implementations
and customers. Forwarded from a product person person in our org...
Sorry I didn't see this note earlier, but wanted to make you aware that
Mase
Heya...
Anyone know if something is up on Qwest's run from Boston to NYC today?
Eric :)
So as not to cause confusion, the complete current JUNOS martian list
is:
0.0.0.0/8
127.0.0.0/8
128.0.0.0/16
191.255.0.0/16
192.0.0.0/24
223.255.255.0/24
240.0.0.0/4
My questions were on a select portion of these, and a portion of the
ones listed in the security appnote on their website.
Thought this would be considered on-topic as guess who would have
to clean up the resulting messes...
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
- Forwarded message from Declan McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Declan McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FC: Draft of Rep. Berman's bill authorizes
>
>
> Gents,
> I thought I would pose the martians question here as well...
>
> I'm trying to find out additional information on the reasoning behind
> adding these martians to the Juniper's security appnote found on their
> website:
>
> PrefixDescription
> 19.255.0.0/16 Ford
> Now, on to some of Juniper default martians:
> 128.0.0.0/16
> 191.255.0.0/16
> 192.0.0.0/24
> 223.255.255.0/24
>
> These prefixes seem to be based on
> www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-iana-special-ipv4-03.txt. I'm
> curious what the reasoning is behind selecting these prefixes only.
> Also
Gents,
I thought I would pose the martians question here as well...
I'm trying to find out additional information on the reasoning behind
adding these martians to the Juniper's security appnote found on their
website:
Prefix Description
19.255.0.0/16 Ford Motor Company
129.156.0.0/16
[NANOG has been bouncing my attempts to reply to this thread
for several days, possibly because I quoted the word "u n st a b l e"
early on, apparently triggering the "un subs cribe" filter for words
that start with "uns" and contain a "b".. If your posts to NANOG have
been silently bo
We're looking to get glass between three buildings, and looking closely at
the 15216 (passive WDM, ie, a prism).
A couple of rambling questions, that perhaps folks here have experience
with.
First, has anyone had experience with ITU Grid Optic GBICs? Do they even
exist?
Second, does anyone kn
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 10:55:43AM -0400, Joe Loiacono wrote:
> Actually RRDTool interpolates any late replys to the nearest specified
> collection timepoint (e.g., every 5th minute.) It doesn't really resample.
That particular document seems to refer to it as resampling, but yes,
interpolation
Actually RRDTool interpolates any late replys to the nearest specified
collection timepoint (e.g., every 5th minute.) It doesn't really resample.
Joe
Matt
A couple people pointed out cisco-nsp would be more appropriate for
questions like the one I posted about packet loss.
http://puck.nether.net/lists/
Ralph Doncaster
principal, IStop.com
Thanks to those who suggested improper duplex negotiation between the 2621
and the 2900.
Although "show int" on the 2621 (running 12.0.7T) indicates full-duplex,
"sh controller" indicates BCR9 =0x (half-duplex).
Ralph Doncaster
principal, IStop.com
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 10:20:58PM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote:
>
> At 2:29 AM -0400 2002/07/23, Phil Rosenthal wrote:
>
> > IMHO Even the really large DNSBL's are barely used -- I think
> > (much) less than 5% of total human mail recipients are behind
> > a mailserver that uses one...
>
>
31 matches
Mail list logo
