Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2014-01-07 15:03:33 -0800:
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2014-01-07 12:53:57 -0800:
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
What would
Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2014-01-07 15:18:00 -0800:
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Chris Jones's message of 2014-01-07 14:43:31 -0800:
Hi
On 7 Jan 2014, at 22:18, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Packages do
Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2014-01-07 16:27:35 -0800:
Another piece to the conversation I think is update philosophy. If
you are always going to require a new image and no customization after
build ever, ever, the messiness that source usually cause in the file
system image really
Excerpts from Susaant Kondapaneni's message of 2014-01-06 09:25:08 -0800:
Hi Steve,
I am trying to understand the software config implementation. Can you
clarify the following:
i. To use Software config and deploy in a template, instance resource MUST
always be accompanied by user_data.
Excerpts from Rushi Agrawal's message of 2014-01-05 05:41:58 -0800:
I can see people arguing in future over which top IDE's/editor's trashfiles
should or shouldn't be included in the gitignores. Also, I believe the
concept of global gitignore is a fantastic one.
Has it ever actually
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2014-01-05 07:47:22 -0800:
While waiting some inordinate amount of time to compile lxml for a
tempest pep8 test, I started to wonder why is it that we are using -U on
all our pip install commands in tox (it's a pretty common pattern across
projects).
I've skimmed the rest of the thread and not seen something mentioned
that seems like it matters a lot. If I missed this suggestion buried
deep in the ensuing discussion, I apologize for that.
Since TaskFlow wants to be generally consumable and not only driven as
an OpenStack component, it should
Luke john.hern...@hp.com
wrote:
On 1/2/14, 4:27 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
I don¹t think it would be that hard to get the review or gate jobs to
use
a real vertica instance, actually. Who do I talk to about that?
http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html
Oh, if you
As a follow-up, I've filed this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1266262
We'll be working around this in TripleO by setting
default_ephemeral_format for our baremetal clouds, but I feel we should
document in Icehouse's release notes that the default will be changed
to ext4 in Juno, so
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2014-01-02 01:59:23 -0800:
A bunch of the TripleO folk are going to be at LCA. I'd like to cancel
the meeting rather than get them all up at (IIRC) 3am.
If folk who aren't going want to hold the meeting, thats fine - but I
won't be around to chair :)
Excerpts from Herndon, John Luke's message of 2014-01-02 15:16:26 -0800:
Hi,
I¹m working on adding a vertica (www.vertica.com) storage driver to
ceilometer. I would love to get this driver into upstream. However, I¹ve
run into a bit of a snag with the tests. It looks like all of the existing
Excerpts from Day, Phil's message of 2013-12-30 11:05:17 -0800:
Hi, so it seems we were saying the same thing - new vms get a shared blank
(empty) file system, not blank disc. How big a problem it is that in many
cases this will be the already created ext3 disk and not ext4 depends I guess
Hi Phil. Thanks for the well reasoned and poignant message urging
caution and forethought in change management. I agree with all of the
sentiments and think that we can do better in reasoning about the impact
of changes. I think this just puts further exposure on the fact that
Nova needs reviewers
Excerpts from LeslieWang's message of 2013-12-24 19:19:52 -0800:
Dear All,
Merry Christmas Happy New Year!
I'm new in TripleO. After some investigation, I have one question on
UnderCloud OverCloud. Per my understanding, UnderCloud will pre-install and
set up all baremetal servers used for
Excerpts from LeslieWang's message of 2013-12-24 03:01:51 -0800:
Hi Oleg,
Thanks for your promptly reply and detail explanation. Merry Christmas and
wish you have a happy new year!
At the same time, I think we can discuss more on Ironic is for backend driver
for nova. I'm new in ironic.
Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2013-12-24 08:50:32 -0800:
I built some vm image files for testing with TripleO based off of the
icehouse-1 milestone tarballs for Fedora and Ubuntu. If folks are
interested in giving them a try you can find a set of instructions and
how to download the
Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2013-12-24 10:40:23 -0800:
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2013-12-24 08:50:32 -0800:
I built some vm image files for testing with TripleO based off of the
icehouse-1
Excerpts from Radomir Dopieralski's message of 2013-12-20 01:13:20 -0800:
On 20/12/13 00:17, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 12/19/2013 04:55 AM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote:
On 14/12/13 16:51, Jay Pipes wrote:
[snip]
Instead of focusing on locking issues -- which I agree are very
important in
Excerpts from Ladislav Smola's message of 2013-12-20 05:48:40 -0800:
On 12/20/2013 02:37 PM, Imre Farkas wrote:
On 12/20/2013 12:25 PM, Ladislav Smola wrote:
2. Heat stack create, update
This is locked in the process of the operation, so nobody can mess with
it while it is updating or
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-19 04:14:51 -0800:
On 12/19/2013 12:10 AM, Mike Perez wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com
mailto:thin...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
I reviewed the TC meeting notes, and my question still stands.
It seems the
Excerpts from Tim Simpson's message of 2013-12-18 07:34:14 -0800:
I've been following the Unified Agent mailing list thread for awhile
now and, as someone who has written a fair amount of code for both of
the two existing Trove agents, thought I should give my opinion about
it. I like the idea
Excerpts from Steven Dake's message of 2013-12-18 08:05:09 -0800:
On 12/18/2013 08:34 AM, Tim Simpson wrote:
I've been following the Unified Agent mailing list thread for awhile
now and, as someone who has written a fair amount of code for both of
the two existing Trove agents, thought I
Excerpts from Dmitry Mescheryakov's message of 2013-12-18 09:32:30 -0800:
Clint, do you mean
* use os-collect-config and its HTTP transport as a base for the PoC
or
* migrate os-collect-config on PoC after it is implemented on
oslo.messaging
I presume the later, but could you clarify?
Excerpts from =?ks_c_5601-1987?B?wMzB2L/4?='s message of 2013-12-18 01:26:22
-0800:
Hi, stackers,
I know only little about Heat, and I can't wholly follow recent
discussions around multi-region support in this mailing list.
Please help me understand the roadmap or plan about hybrid cloud
Excerpts from Steve Baker's message of 2013-12-18 18:21:46 -0800:
I would like to nominate Bartosz Górski to be a heat-core reviewer. His
reviews to date have been valuable and his other contributions to the
project have shown a sound understanding of how heat works.
Here is his review
So I've seen a lot of really great discussion of the unified agents, and
it has made me think a lot about the problem that we're trying to solve.
I just wanted to reiterate that we should be trying to solve real problems
and not get distracted by doing things right or even better.
I actually
Excerpts from Dmitry Mescheryakov's message of 2013-12-17 08:01:38 -0800:
Folks,
The discussion didn't result in a consensus, but it did revealed a great
number of things to be accounted. I've tried to summarize top-level points
in the etherpad [1]. It lists only items everyone (as it seems
Excerpts from Steven Dake's message of 2013-12-14 09:00:53 -0800:
On 12/13/2013 01:13 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Dmitry Mescheryakov's message of 2013-12-13 12:01:01 -0800:
Still, what about one more server process users will have to run? I see
unified agent as library which can
Excerpts from Sylvain Bauza's message of 2013-12-14 06:23:48 -0800:
2013/12/9 Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2013-12-09 09:34:06 -0800:
I'm thinking more generic:
The cloud provider will provide one or more suballocating images. The
one Triple
Excerpts from Scott Moser's message of 2013-12-13 06:28:08 -0800:
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Ian Wells wrote:
On 10 December 2013 20:55, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
If it is just a network API, it works the same for everybody. This
makes it simpler, and thus easier to scale out
Excerpts from Alessandro Pilotti's message of 2013-12-13 07:13:01 -0800:
Hi guys,
This seems to become a pretty long thread with quite a lot of ideas. What do
you think about setting up a meeting on IRC to talk about what direction to
take?
IMO this has the potential of becoming a
Excerpts from Sergey Lukjanov's message of 2013-12-13 07:46:34 -0800:
Hi Alessandro,
it's a good idea to setup an IRC meeting for the unified agents. IMO it'll
seriously speedup discussion. The first one could be used to determine the
correct direction, then we can use them to discuss
Excerpts from Justin Hammond's message of 2013-12-12 08:23:24 -0800:
I am a developer who is currently having troubles keeping up with the
mailing list due to volume, and my inability to organize it in my client.
I am nearly forced to use Outlook 2011 for Mac and I have read and
attempted to
I've been chasing quite a few bugs in the TripleO automated bring-up
lately that have to do with failures because either there are no valid
hosts ready to have servers scheduled, or there are hosts listed and
enabled, but they can't bind to the network because for whatever reason
the L2 agent has
Excerpts from Chris Friesen's message of 2013-12-12 09:19:42 -0800:
On 12/12/2013 11:02 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
So I'm asking, is there a standard way to determine whether or not a
nova-compute is definitely ready to have things scheduled on it? This
can be via an API, or even by observing
Excerpts from Russell Bryant's message of 2013-12-12 09:09:04 -0800:
On 12/12/2013 12:02 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
I've been chasing quite a few bugs in the TripleO automated bring-up
lately that have to do with failures because either there are no valid
hosts ready to have servers scheduled
Excerpts from Dmitry Mescheryakov's message of 2013-12-12 09:24:13 -0800:
Clint, Kevin,
Thanks for reassuring me :-) I just wanted to make sure that having direct
access from VMs to a single facility is not a dead end in terms of security
and extensibility. And since it is not, I agree it is
Excerpts from Kyle Mestery's message of 2013-12-12 09:53:57 -0800:
On Dec 12, 2013, at 11:44 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/12/2013 12:36 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Russell Bryant's message of 2013-12-12 09:09:04 -0800:
On 12/12/2013 12:02 PM, Clint Byrum wrote
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2013-12-12 10:15:13 -0800:
On 12/10/2013 03:49 PM, Ian Wells wrote:
On 10 December 2013 20:55, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
mailto:cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
If it is just a network API, it works the same for everybody. This
makes it simpler
Excerpts from Steven Dake's message of 2013-12-12 12:32:55 -0800:
On 12/12/2013 10:24 AM, Dmitry Mescheryakov wrote:
Clint, Kevin,
Thanks for reassuring me :-) I just wanted to make sure that having
direct access from VMs to a single facility is not a dead end in terms
of security and
Hi!
This list is for discussion of ongoing bugs and features in Heat. For
user-centric discussions, please use the main openstack mailing list:
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Thanks!
Excerpts from Haiming Yang's message of 2013-12-11 09:40:32 -0800:
I think it
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2013-12-09 16:31:37 -0800:
On 6 December 2013 21:56, Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey there,
thanks Rob for keeping eye on this. Speaking for myself, as current
non-coder it was very hard to keep pace with others, especially when
Excerpts from Dmitry Mescheryakov's message of 2013-12-10 08:15:15 -0800:
Guys,
I see two major trends in the thread:
* use Salt
* write our own solution with architecture similar to Salt or MCollective
There were points raised pro and contra both solutions. But I have a
concern
Excerpts from Dmitry Mescheryakov's message of 2013-12-10 08:25:26 -0800:
And one more thing,
Sandy Walsh pointed to the client Rackspace developed and use - [1], [2].
Its design is somewhat different and can be expressed by the following
formulae:
App - Host (XenStore) - Guest Agent
Excerpts from Richard Lee's message of 2013-12-10 09:46:49 -0800:
Hey all,
We're working on a
blueprinthttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/preview-stack
that
adds the ability to preview what a given template+parameters would create
in terms of resources. We think this would
Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2013-12-10 03:00:26 -0800:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:45:11AM +0200, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote:
- wouldn't it be better to keep all these changes in one bug and fix all
misuses per file basis (with one file per patch-set for example)? It seems
to me
Excerpts from Dmitry Mescheryakov's message of 2013-12-10 11:08:58 -0800:
2013/12/10 Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
Excerpts from Dmitry Mescheryakov's message of 2013-12-10 08:25:26 -0800:
And one more thing,
Sandy Walsh pointed to the client Rackspace developed and use - [1], [2
Excerpts from Dmitry Mescheryakov's message of 2013-12-10 12:37:37 -0800:
What is the exact scenario you're trying to avoid?
It is DDoS attack on either transport (AMQP / ZeroMQ provider) or server
(Salt / Our own self-written server). Looking at the design, it doesn't
look like the attack
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-09 08:17:45 -0800:
On 12/06/2013 05:40 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2013-12-06 16:30, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2013-12-06 13:38:16 -0800:
On 2013-12-06 15:14, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
Hello, Sean.
I get
Excerpts from Herman Narkaytis's message of 2013-12-09 08:18:17 -0800:
Hi All,
Last couple of month Mirantis team was working on new scalable scheduler
architecture. The main concept was proposed by Boris Pavlovic in the
following blue print
Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2013-12-09 09:34:06 -0800:
I'm thinking more generic:
The cloud provider will provide one or more suballocating images. The one
Triple O uses to take a bare metal node and make vm's available would be the
obvious one to make available initially. I
Excerpts from Steven Dake's message of 2013-12-09 09:41:06 -0800:
On 12/09/2013 09:41 AM, David Boucha wrote:
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com
mailto:mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 12/08/2013 07:36 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 8 December
Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2013-12-09 03:31:36 -0800:
Hi all,
So I've been getting concerned about $subject recently, and based on some
recent discussions so have some other heat-core folks, so I wanted to start
a discussion where we can agree and communicate our expectations
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2013-12-09 09:52:25 -0800:
On 09/12/13 06:31, Steven Hardy wrote:
Hi all,
So I've been getting concerned about $subject recently, and based on some
recent discussions so have some other heat-core folks, so I wanted to start
a discussion where we
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2013-12-06 23:53:47 -0800:
Agreed,
Chatting earlier today on #cloud-init about all of this I think scott
convinced me that maybe we (the joint we in the community at large) should
think about asking ourselves what do we really want a guest agent
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2013-12-07 00:17:19 -0800:
On 7 December 2013 21:08, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
So what is needed is domain specific command execution and segregation
of capabilities.
Sounds rather like mcollective.
It does actually. If it weren't
Excerpts from Nicolas Barcet's message of 2013-12-07 01:33:01 -0800:
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
So what is needed is domain specific command execution and segregation
of capabilities.
To further this, I know that a lot of security minded people
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2013-12-03 23:12:39 -0800:
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
with -core
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2013-12-05 21:32:54 -0800:
On 12/05/2013 04:25 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Andrew Plunk's message of 2013-12-05 12:42:49 -0800:
Excerpts from Randall Burt's message of 2013-12-05 09:05:44 -0800:
On Dec 5, 2013, at 10:10 AM, Clint Byrum clint
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2013-12-04 14:19:44 -0800:
So - what about us capturing this information outside the image: we
can create a uuid for the build, and write a file in the image with
that uuid, and outside the image we can write:
- all variables (no security
Excerpts from Tzu-Mainn Chen's message of 2013-12-06 07:37:20 -0800:
Hey all,
We're starting to work on the UI for tuskar based on Jarda's wireframes, and
as we're doing so, we're realizing that
we're not quite sure what development methodology is appropriate. Some
questions:
a)
Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2013-12-06 13:38:16 -0800:
On 2013-12-06 15:14, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
Hello, Sean.
I get the issue with upgrade path. User doesn't want to update config
unless one is forced to do so.
But introducing code that weakens security and let it
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2013-12-06 16:46:24 -0800:
On 12/06/2013 01:38 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2013-12-05 21:32:54 -0800:
On 12/05/2013 04:25 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Andrew Plunk's message of 2013-12-05 12:42:49
-0800
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2013-12-06 12:27:10 -0800:
Another idea that I'll put up for consideration (since I work with the
cloud-init codebase also).
Cloud-init[1] which currently does lots of little useful initialization
types of activities (similar to the racker agents
Excerpts from Sandy Walsh's message of 2013-12-06 12:12:16 -0800:
On 12/06/2013 03:45 PM, Dmitry Mescheryakov wrote:
Hello all,
We would like to push further the discussion on unified guest agent. You
may find the details of our proposal at [1].
Also let me clarify why we started
Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2013-12-04 17:54:45 -0800:
Why not just use glance?
I've asked that question a few times, and I think I can collate the
responses I've received below. I think enhancing glance to do these
things is on the table:
1. Glance is for big blobs of data not
Excerpts from Julien Danjou's message of 2013-12-05 01:22:00 -0800:
On Wed, Dec 04 2013, Sean Dague wrote:
Honestly, I'd love us to be clever and figure out a not dangerous way
through this, even if unwise (where we can yell at the user in the LOGs
loudly, and fail them in J if
Excerpts from Tim Schnell's message of 2013-12-05 09:49:03 -0800:
On 12/5/13 11:33 AM, Randall Burt randall.b...@rackspace.com wrote:
On Dec 5, 2013, at 11:10 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
wrote:
Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2013-12-05 08:35:12 -0800:
On Thu, Dec 5
Excerpts from Randall Burt's message of 2013-12-05 09:05:44 -0800:
On Dec 5, 2013, at 10:10 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
wrote:
Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2013-12-04 17:54:45 -0800:
Why not just use glance?
I've asked that question a few times, and I think I can
Excerpts from Andrew Plunk's message of 2013-12-05 12:42:49 -0800:
Excerpts from Randall Burt's message of 2013-12-05 09:05:44 -0800:
On Dec 5, 2013, at 10:10 AM, Clint Byrum clint at fewbar.com
wrote:
Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2013-12-04 17:54:45 -0800:
Why not just
Excerpts from Tim Schnell's message of 2013-12-05 13:07:17 -0800:
On 12/5/13 12:17 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Tim Schnell's message of 2013-12-05 09:49:03 -0800:
On 12/5/13 11:33 AM, Randall Burt randall.b...@rackspace.com wrote:
On Dec 5, 2013, at 11:10 AM
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-04 10:51:16 -0800:
On 12/04/2013 11:56 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2013-12-04 06:07, Sean Dague wrote:
On 12/03/2013 11:21 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-03 16:05:47 -0800:
On 12/03/2013 06:13 PM, Ben Nemec
Excerpts from Paul Montgomery's message of 2013-12-04 12:04:06 -0800:
TLDR: Should Solum log a warning if operators do not use the InnoDB
storage engine with MySQL in Solum's control plane?
Details:
I was looking at: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/57024/
Models.py to be specific.
Excerpts from Adrian Otto's message of 2013-12-04 15:44:45 -0800:
Jamie,
Thanks for the guidance here. I am checking to see if any of our developers
might take an interest in helping with the upstream work. At the very least,
it might be nice to have some understanding of how much work
Excerpts from Adrian Otto's message of 2013-12-04 16:53:16 -0800:
Clint,
On Dec 4, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
wrote:
Excerpts from Adrian Otto's message of 2013-12-04 15:44:45 -0800:
Jamie,
Thanks for the guidance here. I am checking to see if any of our
Excerpts from Maru Newby's message of 2013-12-03 08:08:09 -0800:
I've been investigating a bug that is preventing VM's from receiving IP
addresses when a Neutron service is under high load:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1192381
High load causes the DHCP agent's status updates to
Excerpts from Maru Newby's message of 2013-12-03 19:37:19 -0800:
On Dec 4, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Maru Newby's message of 2013-12-03 08:08:09 -0800:
I've been investigating a bug that is preventing VM's from receiving IP
addresses when
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-03 16:05:47 -0800:
On 12/03/2013 06:13 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2013-12-03 17:09, Sean Dague wrote:
On 12/03/2013 05:50 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 16:23 -0600, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2013-12-03 15:56, Sean Dague wrote:
This
Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2013-11-25 20:25:50 -0800:
Back in the Day, Barbican was just one Service of Cloud Keep. While I
would say that KDS belongs in the Cloud Keep, it is not the same as, and
should not be deployed with Barbican. Is it possible to keep them as
separate
Excerpts from Jay Lau's message of 2013-11-28 16:48:41 -0800:
Hi,
I'm now trying to deploy a hadoop cluster with heat, just wondering if
someone who has a heat template which can help me do the work.
Hi Jay, this is off topic for the openstack-dev mailing list. Please
re-post your question
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2013-11-27 08:09:33 -0800:
In the longer term, there seems to be a lot of demand for some sort of
template catalog service, like Glance for templates. (I disagree with
Clint that it should actually _be_ Glance the project as we know it, for
the reasons
Excerpts from Tim Schnell's message of 2013-11-27 09:16:24 -0800:
On 11/27/13 10:09 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 26/11/13 22:24, Tim Schnell wrote:
I propose adding an additional field to the parameter definition:
Parameters:
parameter name:
Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2013-11-27 08:58:16 -0800:
This use case is sort of a providence case. Where did the stack come from so
I can find out more about it.
This exhibits similar problems to our Copyright header problems. Relying
on authors to maintain their authorship
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2013-11-27 10:57:56 -0800:
On 11/27/2013 01:28 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
I propose adding an additional field to the parameter definition:
Parameters:
parameter name:
description: This is the name of a nova key pair
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2013-11-26 03:23:51 -0800:
Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
So my proposal is that we make it part of the base hygiene for a
project
Excerpts from Ladislav Smola's message of 2013-11-26 06:04:12 -0800:
Hello,
seems too big to do the inline comments, so just a few notes here:
If we truly want to have Templates portable, it would mean to have the
'metadata' somehow standardised, right?
Can you point to another portable
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2013-11-25 01:30:11 -0800:
On 25 November 2013 22:23, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
I do wonder if we would be able to commit enough resources to just run
two copies of the gate in parallel each time and require both to pass.
Doubling
Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2013-11-25 06:52:02 -0800:
On 11/25/2013 04:23 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Joe Gordon's message of 2013-11-24 21:00:58 -0800:
Hi All,
TL;DR Last week the gate got wedged on nondeterministic failures. Unwedging
the gate required drastic
Excerpts from Tim Schnell's message of 2013-11-25 14:51:39 -0800:
Hi Steve,
As one of the UI developers driving the requirements behind these new
blueprints I wanted to take a moment to assure you and the rest of the
Openstack community that the primary purpose of pushing these requirements
Excerpts from Adrian Otto's message of 2013-11-22 18:51:16 -0800:
Monty,
On Nov 22, 2013, at 6:24 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com
wrote:
On 11/22/2013 05:37 PM, Krishna Raman wrote:
Hello all,
I would like to kickoff the Git integration discussion. Goal of this
subgroup is
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2013-11-22 01:50:39 -0800:
Tim Bell wrote:
Can we make sure that the costs for the end users are also considered as
part of this ?
- Configuration management will need further modules
- Dashboard confusion as we get multiple
Excerpts from Clayton Coleman's message of 2013-11-22 21:43:40 -0800:
On Nov 22, 2013, at 9:54 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 11/22/2013 11:34 AM, Clayton Coleman wrote:
I have updated the language pack (name subject to change) blueprint
with the outcomes from
Excerpts from Boris Pavlovic's message of 2013-11-21 00:16:04 -0800:
Clint,
The main idea is to have processed by human history of project.
It is really impossible to aggregate automatically all data from different
sources:
IRC (main project chat/dev chat/meetings), Mailing Lists, Code,
Excerpts from Thomas Spatzier's message of 2013-11-19 23:35:40 -0800:
Excerpts from Steve Baker's message on 19.11.2013 21:40:54:
From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 19.11.2013 21:43
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software
Excerpts from Mike Spreitzer's message of 2013-11-20 13:46:25 -0800:
Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote on 11/19/2013 04:28:31 PM:
From: Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
To: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 11/19/2013 04:30 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT
Excerpts from Mike Spreitzer's message of 2013-11-20 11:09:34 -0800:
OTOH, the more we restrict what can be done, the less useful this really
is.
I would be more specific and say it as ...the less divergent behavior
is actually possible.
It will be quite a bit more useful if it is boring and
Excerpts from Chuck Short's message of 2013-11-20 19:21:14 -0800:
Hi,
So maybe if it gets to the point where it gets too be much of a porblem we
should just put it on stackforge.
That should be the last resort, when upstream is deemed dead. I'm guessing
upstream would not like to fade away
Excerpts from Mike Spreitzer's message of 2013-11-20 15:16:45 -0800:
Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote on 11/20/2013 05:41:16 PM:
Autoscaling doesn't really fly with stateful services IMO.
I presume you're concerned about the auto part, not the scaling. Even
a stateful group
Excerpts from Boris Pavlovic's message of 2013-11-19 21:33:08 -0800:
Hi stackers,
Currently what I see is growing amount of interesting projects, that at
least I would like to track. But reading all mailing lists, and reviewing
all patches in all interesting projects to get high level
Excerpts from Vijay Venkatachalam's message of 2013-11-19 05:48:43 -0800:
Hi Sam, Eugene, Avishay, etal,
Today I spent some time to create a write-up for SSL
Termination not exactly design doc. Please share your comments!
1001 - 1100 of 1222 matches
Mail list logo
