On 10/01/2013 03:45 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just found out that there's already a source package called
> "trove" in Debian:
>
> http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/trove
>
> Lucky, I don't think it will clash with OpenStack trove since it
> produces libtrove-java* .deb file
On 10/01/2013 01:40 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First of all, before I reply, I'd like to tell that hopefully, I believe
> we're fine in this specific case (at least on the Debian side of
> things). Though it really shouldn't have happen, and I believe it's my
> role to warn everybody ab
Thx for getting this squared away zigo!!
On Oct 1, 2013, at 10:40 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First of all, before I reply, I'd like to tell that hopefully, I believe
> we're fine in this specific case (at least on the Debian side of
> things). Though it really shouldn't have happen, and
Hi,
First of all, before I reply, I'd like to tell that hopefully, I believe
we're fine in this specific case (at least on the Debian side of
things). Though it really shouldn't have happen, and I believe it's my
role to warn everybody about the risks.
On 10/02/2013 12:02 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 10/01/2013 11:23 PM, Michael Basnight wrote:
>
> On Oct 1, 2013, at 8:00 AM, Nicholas Chase wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 10/1/2013 10:53 AM, Michael Basnight wrote:
>>
>>> Well this sucks. Im not sure im a fan of renaming it because of the
>>> previous existence of a package. Renaming is not fun. Ill
On 10/01/2013 11:45 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 10/01/2013 10:02 PM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:45:17PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>> Since I have already uploaded python-troveclient (currently waiting in
>>> the FTP master's NEW queue), OpenStack troveclient will
On 10/01/2013 10:02 PM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:45:17PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Since I have already uploaded python-troveclient (currently waiting in
>> the FTP master's NEW queue), OpenStack troveclient will be in Sid, but
>> if some day, someone wants to uplo
On Oct 1, 2013, at 8:00 AM, Nicholas Chase wrote:
>
>
> On 10/1/2013 10:53 AM, Michael Basnight wrote:
>
>> Well this sucks. Im not sure im a fan of renaming it because of the previous
>> existence of a package. Renaming is not fun. Ill let the more experienced
>> openstack peoples help deci
On 10/1/2013 10:53 AM, Michael Basnight wrote:
Well this sucks. Im not sure im a fan of renaming it because of the previous
existence of a package. Renaming is not fun. Ill let the more experienced
openstack peoples help decide on this...
Certainly it's not fun, but wouldn't it be easier t
On Oct 1, 2013, at 6:45 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just found out that there's already a source package called
> "trove" in Debian:
>
> http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/trove
>
> Lucky, I don't think it will clash with OpenStack trove since it
> produces libtrove-java* .de
Hi,
I have just found out that there's already a source package called
"trove" in Debian:
http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/trove
Lucky, I don't think it will clash with OpenStack trove since it
produces libtrove-java* .deb files, though that's quite annoying. The
source package for OpenStac
11 matches
Mail list logo
