On Sat, 29 Dec, 2007 at 19:22:13 -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Jon Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [12-29-07 16:15]:
Incidentally it's around the same time I check the mail and see this thread.
Uninstalling Amarok;
a13:/home/jon # rpm --test -e amarok
error: Failed dependencies:
On Sun, 30 Dec, 2007 at 09:26:04 +0100, Jon Clausen wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec, 2007 at 19:22:13 -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
rpm --test -e amarok amarok-xine amarok-yauap
Indeed. I should have thought of that.
you are building a house of sticks and pulling out hair that will not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Saturday 2007-12-29 at 00:10 -0500, Bob S wrote:
In other words, what you were trying to say is that you wanted to
uninstall kde. OK, Note that you *do not* have to reinstall the OS, when
you decide that you want kde again.
No guys, what he
On Sat, 29 Dec, 2007 at 12:20:49 +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
snip
I can certainly see an application having a dependency for certain things
in
the basic desktop system. I cannot see why the desktop system would have a
dependency on an obscure add-on type of application to function. That is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Jon Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [12-29-07 16:15]:
Incidentally it's around the same time I check the mail and see this thread.
Uninstalling Amarok;
a13:/home/jon # rpm --test -e amarok
error: Failed dependencies:
libamarok.so.0 is
On Saturday 29 December 2007 06:20:49 am Carlos E. R. wrote:
I can certainly see an application having a dependency for certain things
in the basic desktop system. I cannot see why the desktop system would
have a dependency on an obscure add-on type of application to function.
That is
OK, i installed 10.3 (reinstalled) with kde instead of gnome. In gnome, i could
not install apps that i did not want, like evolution, pan and mc and so
on..But with kde, i am finding it is much harder to not install certain
apps, like amarok, kde-kopete and konversation. During the install,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Chris Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [12-28-07 15:27]:
OK, i installed 10.3 (reinstalled) with kde instead of gnome. In
gnome, i could not install apps that i did not want, like evolution,
pan and mc and so on..
is this *not* a good thing (*!TM)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Chris Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [12-28-07 15:27]:
OK, i installed 10.3 (reinstalled) with kde instead of gnome. In
gnome, i could not install apps that i did not want, like evolution,
pan and mc and so on..
is this *not* a good thing (*!TM)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-12-28 at 15:16 -0500, Chris Arnold wrote:
OK, i installed 10.3 (reinstalled) with kde instead of gnome. In gnome,
i could not install apps that i did not want, like evolution, pan and mc
and so on..
And you reinstalled? Did
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-12-28 at 15:37 -0500, Chris Arnold wrote:
This email you sent is broken. This is what I get:
--- GPG signed message, DOES NOT verify---
--- GPG output
Carlos E. R. wrote:
which you have to solve one by one by either unistalling those things
requiring amarok, or ignoring them (which probably only postpones the
problem).
Take for instance, kpowersave ( i have no need for it as this is not a laptop)
and when trying to remove kpowersave:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-12-28 at 16:00 -0500, Chris Arnold wrote:
which you have to solve one by one by either unistalling those things
requiring amarok, or ignoring them (which probably only postpones the
problem).
Take for instance, kpowersave ( i
Carlos E. R. wrote:
Take for instance, kpowersave ( i have no need for it as this is not a
laptop) and when trying to remove kpowersave:
You are making the assumption that you do not need kpowersave, and that is
wrong.
Umm, i don't want it or need it. I removed it without any problems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-12-28 at 19:37 -0500, Chris Arnold wrote:
Carlos E. R. wrote:
Take for instance, kpowersave ( i have no need for it as this is not a laptop)
and when trying to remove kpowersave:
You are making the assumption that you do not
Chris Arnold wrote:
Carlos E. R. wrote:
Take for instance, kpowersave ( i have no need for it as this is not a
laptop) and when trying to remove kpowersave:
You are making the assumption that you do not need kpowersave, and that is
wrong.
Umm, i don't want it or need it. I removed it
On Friday 28 December 2007 08:27:25 pm Joe Sloan wrote:
Chris Arnold wrote:
Carlos E. R. wrote:
Take for instance, kpowersave ( i have no need for it as this is not a
laptop) and when trying to remove kpowersave:
You are making the assumption that you do not need kpowersave, and that
17 matches
Mail list logo