Re: [OPSAWG] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-www-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm

Hi all, Support the adoption as co-author. Best Regards Liu Chang China Unicom Email: liuc...@chinaunicom.cn Phone: +8618601102572 ---Original--- From: OPSAWG ;> On Behalf Of Joe Clarke (jclarke) Sent: 29 January 2021 14:18 T

Re: [OPSAWG] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-www-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm

Hi Adrian, Thanks for your review and comments. Please see inline. Thanks, Bo -邮件原件- 发件人: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Adrian Farrel 发送时间: 2021年2月3日 7:09 收件人: 'Joe Clarke (jclarke)' ; opsawg@ietf.org 主题: Re: [OPSAWG] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-www-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm

Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds

hi job, as ggm said, really appreciate your showing the tech can be done. openssl is conservative, which has good and bad effects. randy ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-www-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm

Hi all??     I have read this draft and I support the adoption. Best Regards, Wei -- Original -- From: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)"

Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds

> Well, "whatever", but I liked the paragraph we had arrived at. ok, ok. i could not stand the whining and put it back :) it's just that i really prefer words to communicate something. randy ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.or

Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds

I think this is useful. It shows how tools that operations people are familiar with can be used to improve the trust in the feed. Nice work Job! -G On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 12:25 PM Job Snijders wrote: > > Dear Randy, working group, > > It appears to me you really wanted to ask 'how the heck did

Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds

Dear Randy, working group, It appears to me you really wanted to ask 'how the heck did you do it???' *** warning: operating a CA is real work, do NOT follow the below *** I declared my signing operation 'proprietary' because I can't recommend it as a 'recipe'. I prefer to promote man pages over

Re: [OPSAWG] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-www-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm

Hi Joe, I think this document fills a hole in the set of YANG models we have for managing and operating services over our network, and I'd like the WG to pick it up and polish it. I commit to doing a review or two as the draft advances. To kick that off there are a few comments below. None of th

Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds

> The signature was produced through proprietary means, but for the > purpose of validating the signature & interopability testing that > shouldn't matter... right? unless you are a security person and lived through trojans such as dual-ec. extension of kerckhoffs's principle. randy __

Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds

Hi Randy, On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 10:26:53AM -0800, Randy Bush wrote: > folk trying to verify this are whining about some missing code I'm not entirely sure what 'missing code' you are referring to. On Debian Bullseye the required software can be installed using: $ sudo apt install openssl r

Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds

> Authenticating the Geofeed data > === > > The uncommented section of the file conforms to RFC 8805: > > $ head -1 geofeed.csv | tee geofeed_tbs > 2001:67c:208c::/48,NL,NL-NH,Amsterdam > > The commented out section of the geofeed.csv file contains a base64 >

Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds

Well, "whatever", but I liked the paragraph we had arrived at. A -Original Message- From: Randy Bush Sent: 02 February 2021 00:37 To: Erik Kline Cc: adr...@olddog.co.uk; Ops Area WG ; opsawg-cha...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofe...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft

Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds

On 2/2/21 7:05 AM, Randy Bush wrote: 5. oh, speaking of Iff, I would prefer if and only if, extended. will you not hate me if i leave it and let rfc have one more reason to whack me? who, me? iff I was a hater maybe I could seize this opportunity -- antonio _