Re: [Pacemaker] Building an active/passive dhcp server

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:47:59PM +0100, Emmanuel Lesouef wrote: > I'm trying to make a active/passive dhcp server. [...] > The problem is that when node1 come online again, there's a difference > in the dhcp lease file. > > I think that using rsync to synchronize the lease file is not the best

[Pacemaker] Building an active/passive dhcp server

Hello, I'm trying to make a active/passive dhcp server. Currently, it works with the following setup : * 2 debian servers with pacemaker : node1 with physical ip1 and virtual ip vip1 (managed with pacemaker) node2 with physical ip2. * 1 lsb dhcp3-server resource that is on node1 and migrates ok

Re: [Pacemaker] [PATCH] Medium: build: require Net-SNMP 5.3 or later

On 03/19/2010 03:39 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> Who said you should build RC _packages_? >> >> Tag an RC, upload a tarball, announce on mailing list, done. How is that >> extra work? >> >> No wait, Pacemaker builds directly from a Mercurial tarball. So scratch >> the upload part. > > What does th

Re: [Pacemaker] WARNING: drbd0: default-action-timeout

Hi, On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 09:24:16AM -0400, Ken Dechick wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks for the responses. I actaully had it figured out a few minutes after > I posted - doh! I just added: > 'op start timeout="XXs op stop timeout="XXs"' for the 3 primitives that were > giving this warning - obvi

Re: [Pacemaker] [PATCH] Medium: build: require Net-SNMP 5.3 or later

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Florian Haas wrote: > On 03/18/2010 10:02 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 09:17:38AM +0100, Florian Haas wrote: Andrew, now that Pacemaker has been o

Re: [Pacemaker] node states

On 03/17/2010 09:30 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Matthew Palmer wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 07:16:16AM -0500, Schaefer, Diane E wrote: >>> We were wondering what the node state of UNCLEAN, with the three >>> variations of online, offline and pending return

Re: [Pacemaker] [PATCH] Medium: build: require Net-SNMP 5.3 or later

On 03/18/2010 10:02 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 09:17:38AM +0100, Florian Haas wrote: >>> Andrew, >>> >>> now that Pacemaker has been on a bi-monthly release schedule for a >>> while, is there any ch

Re: [Pacemaker] WARNING: drbd0: default-action-timeout

Hi all, Thanks for the responses. I actaully had it figured out a few minutes after I posted - doh! I just added: 'op start timeout="XXs op stop timeout="XXs"' for the 3 primitives that were giving this warning - obviously using the suggested defaults for each. In the case of DRBD I simply had

Re: [Pacemaker] Problem : Sometimes failed in the start of the guest(on KVM).

Hi Dejan, > IIRC, that port has to do with vnc and something else (another > VNC server?) has already been started on that port. Thank you for comment. I examine it a little more. Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi Hideo-san, > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:46:1

Re: [Pacemaker] logd and corosync/pacemaker

Hi, On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:34:27AM +0100, Andreas Mock wrote: > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Dejan Muhamedagic > Gesendet: 15.03.2010 11:01:03 > An: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] logd and corosync/pacemaker > > >Hi, > > > >On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 05:24:

Re: [Pacemaker] Problem : Sometimes failed in the start of the guest(on KVM).

Hi Hideo-san, On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:46:12AM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > Hi, > > I use VirtualDomain-RA and, on KVM, constitute a cluster. > > However, a guest sometimes fails in start. > > Mar 16 15:16:52 x3650e lrmd: [13457]: info: RA output: > (guest-kvm1:start:stderr) er

Re: [Pacemaker] WARNING: drbd0: default-action-timeout

Hi, On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:52:24PM +0100, Andreas Mock wrote: > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Michael Schwartzkopff > Gesendet: 18.03.2010 21:32:22 > An: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] WARNING: drbd0: default-action-timeout > > >Hi, > > > >new introduced

[Pacemaker] Packaging error in cluster-glue

Hi all, I don't know who feels responsible for that, but I found the following: My external stonith script ibmrsa-telnet was enhanced in several ways which is great. I take the chance to thank all contributors. One of the enhancements was a change in logging. From the beginning there was a way t

[Pacemaker] DRBD Management Console 0.7.0

Hi, This is the next DRBD-MC beta release 0.7.0. DRBD-MC, that is also a Pacemaker GUI, is a Java application that helps to configure DRBD/Pacemaker/Corosync/Heartbeat clusters. It is compatible with Heartbeat 2.1.3 to the Pacemaker 1.0.8 with both available communication layers and DRBD 8. I

Re: [Pacemaker] logd and corosync/pacemaker

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Dejan Muhamedagic Gesendet: 15.03.2010 11:01:03 An: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] logd and corosync/pacemaker >Hi, > >On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 05:24:53PM +0100, Andreas Mock wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> with heartbeat it was adviced to us