https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018393
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
lv2-artyfx-plugins-0-1.2.20131011git918613f.fc19 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lv2-artyfx-plugins-0-1.2.20131011git918613f.fc19
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023690
Bug ID: 1023690
Summary: Review Request: rspamd - Fast, free and open-source
spam filtering system
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Seve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023706
Bug ID: 1023706
Summary: Review Request: ghc-zlib - Compression and
decompression in the gzip and zlib formats
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023706
--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen ---
This package built on koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6104174
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023706
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haskell-devel@lists.fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023619
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from Emm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023714
Bug ID: 1023714
Summary: Review Request: lpf skype: Skype internet phone client
package bootstrap
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Sever
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023714
Alec Leamas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
--- Comment #1 from A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023714
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: lpf skype: |Review Request: lpf-skype:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995933
Darryl L. Pierce changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023706
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen ---
Tidied the description:
Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-zlib/ghc-zlib.spec
SRPM:
http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-zlib/ghc-zlib-0.5.4.1-26.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335
--- Comment #41 from Sven Baus ---
(In reply to Björn "besser82" Esser from comment #40)
> btw. looking at comment 9: mschwendt said he got the build working using
> `export LANG="us_US.UTF-8"` before invoking the compiler-stage. Might be
> wo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335
--- Comment #42 from Sven Baus ---
SPEC:
http://sbbaus.fedorapeople.org/AudioCuesheetEditor/SPECS/AudioCuesheetEditor.spec
RPM:
http://sbbaus.fedorapeople.org/AudioCuesheetEditor/RPMS/x86_64/AudioCuesheetEditor-1.0.3-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm
SRPM:
htt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
Paul Cochrane changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(p...@liekut.de) |
--- Comment #7 from Paul Cochrane --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023601
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen ---
You can use "cblrpm -l spec" to force a BinLib package to become Lib.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023601
--- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen ---
(Hmm perhaps cblrpm should just default all package with a library to be called
ghc-*. I might do that in the next release.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023601
--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen ---
Sorry I see I didn't answer your actual question:
> Should I just combine the subpackage it made (ghc-aeson-pretty) and the base
> package (aeson-pretty) into ghc-aeson-pretty?
Hmm it probably depends on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021919
--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok ---
admesh has been built for rawhide.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022283
--- Comment #24 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Oops, I run fedora-review on this, and there still are issues:
1. "Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build"
There's lib/javaversion.class, which should be recompiled from sou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995933
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Chr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995933
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng ---
Thank you so much!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001746
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015701
--- Comment #20 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
I learnt in another review that .woffs are not supposed to be packaged:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Web_Assets#Fonts.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970956
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989866
--- Comment #10 from Mario Blättermann ---
Back from holidays now...?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842107
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- Co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842107
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assigne
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842107
--- Comment #11 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Oh, the font is also in sugar-srilanka-0:1-4.fc20.noarch. It should be
unbundled from both and shared.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015701
--- Comment #21 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
That's right. Whichever format upstream is providing fonts, try to package ttf
or otf only if available that format.
For fonts packages its recommended to create a font package information on
Fedora wik
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821455
Cristian Ciupitu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #15 from Cr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016170
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013669
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001407
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019435
Eduardo Echeverria changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||echevemas...@gmail.com
--- Comme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023769
Bug ID: 1023769
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-goerlang-dist - An
implementation of Erlang node
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023771
Bug ID: 1023771
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-goerlang-epmd - Erlang
Port Mapper Daemon protocol
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023772
Bug ID: 1023772
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-goerlang-etf - Erlang
external term format encoding/decoding for Go
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023773
Bug ID: 1023773
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-goerlang-node - An
implementation of Erlang node
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023774
Bug ID: 1023774
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-goerlang-port - Simple
API to write Erlang ports in Go
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023776
Bug ID: 1023776
Summary: Review Request: eclus - An Erlang Port Mapping Daemon
service
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023776
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1023769, 1023771, 1023772,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023769
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1023776
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023774
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1023776
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023773
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1023776
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023772
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1023776
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023771
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1023776
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002151
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo ---
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6105063
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005930
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo ---
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6105088
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005904
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/restlet-jse.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/restlet-jse-2.1.4-1.fc19.src.rpm
- update to 2.1.4
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022283
--- Comment #25 from Mosaab Alzoubi ---
No problem, all will be fixed.
* java-devel is enough
* Can we write (GPL2+) instead of (GPLv2+ and GPLv3 and GPLv3+) ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
--- Comment #8 from Ken Dreyer ---
(As a correction to comment #6: my license clarification request is at
https://github.com/openid/ruby-openid/issues/64, not 60.)
(In reply to Mamoru TASAKA from comment #7)
> * Note that the executable p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015868
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015701
Mosaab Alzoubi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||khaledho...@eglug.org
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
--- Comment #8 from Scott Talbert ---
I think /usr/share should be fine for *.pl. 'fedora-review' package, for
example, uses /usr/share for all of its *.py files, which I think is similar.
So it seems fine.
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984560
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tchollingswo...@gmail.com
--- Com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015701
--- Comment #23 from Mosaab Alzoubi ---
- Dropped .woff fonts.
- Update description by official one.
- Make this package ready for building if it possible later.
Spec : http://ojuba.org/oji/SPECS/amiri-fonts.spec
SRPM : http://ojuba.org/oji/S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022283
--- Comment #26 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
License names are taken from
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Software_License_List.
There's only GPLvX not GPLX in that list. And GPLv2+ means "GPL v2 or any
later
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Scott Talbert from comment #8)
> I think /usr/share should be fine for *.pl. 'fedora-review' package, for
> example, uses /usr/share for all of its *.py files, which I think is
> similar.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016170
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #2 from Ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015701
--- Comment #24 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Oh, one more issue:
1. change %define to %global
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
--- Comment #10 from Scott Talbert ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
[!]: License field should be GPLv2 (vs GPLv2+) - I did not see anything
indicating
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008772
--- Comment #6 from Scott Talbert ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5)
> Would you like to add BR of fox-utils so you can test the
> GUI(https://github.com/signal11/hidapi/blob/master/README.txt#L148)?
I disabled building the te
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023848
Bug ID: 1023848
Summary: Review Request: closure-compiler - JavaScript minifier
and checker
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021749
--- Comment #8 from Remi Collet ---
I think(In reply to Shawn Iwinski from comment #0)
> * Intl requires Icu and Icu requires Intl so I'm not sure I can separate out
> the Icu pkg
I think is will be preferable to have a separate package for s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015701
--- Comment #25 from Mosaab Alzoubi ---
OK done:
Spec : http://ojuba.org/oji/SPECS/amiri-fonts.spec
SRPM : http://ojuba.org/oji/SRPMS/amiri-fonts-0.106-6.oji.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
65 matches
Mail list logo
