My work group, the training department for a large chemical company, just
had a meeting where I was given the task of upgrading some of our photo
related equipment. Most of our work will be in digital, as most of the
training has transferred to computer based. We have extensive slide files,
some
EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of W Keith Mosier
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 1:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT - digital to slide conversion
My work group, the training department for a large chemical company, just
had a meeting where I was given the task of up
W Keith Mosier wrote:
> Does anyone know how to convert digital images to common sized
> transparencies? Expensive/inexpensive? Why?
Anyone with a negative writer can do it. Cost varies wildly from place
to place, depending on quality and speed. Places like Kinkos will do
inexpensive, not-so
Keith Mosier wrote:
> For some reason, which could not be explained to me, my cohorts
> foresee the need to convert a digital image file to a transparency.
[Snip]
> Does anyone know how to convert digital images to common sized
> transparencies? Expensive/inexpensive? Why?
Hi Keith,
Coul
W Keith Mosier writes:
> (Can't wait for the MZ-S/digital, and the budget isn't that fat.)
Pity, because if you put the FA100/2.8 macro lens on it you'll have a
"scanner".
> Does anyone know how to convert digital images to common sized
> transparencies? Expensive/inexpensive? Why?
There
Thanks, to those who responded to my question about the digital image to
transparency situation. Several good suggestions. Out local high quality
digital lab doesn't offer the service because the quality is usually very
poor even with a ultra high resolution file. The tech recommended copying
a
6 matches
Mail list logo