t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2002 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: Developing Tri-X 400
> Hey... that could be a future pentax discussion post:
>
> What's Your Favorite Developing Recipe?
>
> So that way, someone can create their very own de
> I haven't had much success with Tmax 100. With Tmax 400, I
> generally expose it
> at ISO 200, then
> develop it in D76 1:1 for 11 minutes at 68 deg. F. I agitate 15
> times for 5
> seconds each time. I use stop bath,
> but I precede it with a water rinse.
I like constant agitation (even thou
"J. C. O'Connell" wrote:
>
> I think it's better to experiment with film speed and development
> time keeping film, developer, developer temp, developer dilution, &
> agitation all
> constant. That way you can really get best results. T
I agree. It's best to perfect one developer before moving o
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Stenquist
> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 4:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Developing Tri-X 400
>
>
> gabriel bovino wrote:
>
> > Well...
gabriel bovino wrote:
> Well I want to thank everyone for their advice!!! Because I was so
> eager to try developing my own negs after about 10 years... I went out a
> bought what was only available at the local camera shop.
>
> T-MAX Developer
> Kodafix Solution
> Kodak Stop Bath
> Kodak Ph
everything looks great... except where the film
buckled a little and it did not develop correctly.
- Original Message -
From: "Frantisek Vlcek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: Develop
PJ> After some discussion with Shel, he reccomended TriX to me and i've been
PJ> using it for most of my b/w since then, i do use Neopan 1600 when i need
PJ> some xtra speed (which is a really good film for its speed).
You have TX and use Neopan 1600 to get to 1600 ISO?!? What a
blasphemy! Both TX
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Jones"
Subject: Re: Developing Tri-X 400
> I really like TriX and I like the grain :)
A very important thing, since grain is an intrinsic component of
the final image.
So many things have to be ~right~ for a picture to work. We
dwell
er in
Rodinal, but not by much. But the grain was a problem for me.
Regards,
Paul Jones
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 5:06 PM
Subject: RE: Developing Tri-X 400
> Wh
I'm still in the learning process with B&W (developing in a daylight tank
and printing with Vuescan, PS 6.0, and Epson 1270). Over the weekend I
tried Mike Johnston's suggestion and shot Tri-X at 200 and processed in D-76
1:1 for 8 minutes. I was pleased with the results.
Bill, KG4LOV
[EMAIL PR
Why are people so enamored with Tri-X?
I use Tmax 100 developed with Tmax developer
and the results are outstanding. Tri-X is
so grainy I dont understand why anyone would
want to use it anymore.
Just a quick comment on Tmax 400, it's way too
fussy and I have never been able to get good
results wi
NYIP has a series on B&W processing on their web site. There are ten
installments and, for someone getting started, or just wanting to
refresh his or her information, it's a good place to check out.
http://www.nyip.com/tips/topic_black_white.html
http://www.nyip.com/tips/topic_black_white_02.htm
Hi Paul ...
Allow me to present another side of your suggestions, although they are
good ones.
First, I'd recommend against HC-110 and stick with D-76 or ID-11 as the
first developers, since they are, essentially, the benchmark by which
other developers are measured. From there I'd experiment w
Hi,
Stop in at a good camera store and get yourself a copy of the Kodak Darkroom
Dataguide. It will list recommended developers and other chemicals needed to
process that Tri-X . It also provides good instructions. You'll see the book
includes developmeent times for the various films. If I were y
14 matches
Mail list logo
