Yep, but both of the SMCT version have a 58mm
filter, so I didnt mention it.
Yes, the SMCP(k) 135mm F2.5 is the same as the
second version of the SMCT optically, but I
doubt it is as good mechanically, but close.
Both the 2nd SMCT and the SMCP are very high
performance but fall short of an IF de
Why not use the short extension tube? That should give you good portrait
focusing distance.
Paul
Dan Scott wrote:
>
> On Saturday, September 21, 2002, at 05:51 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> >
> > Anyone know of a webstore that sells high
> > quality closeup lenses at good prices?
> > What are th
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 5:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: SMCT 135/2.5 UPDATE/source for closeup lenses
>
>
> Why not use the short extension tube? That should give you good portrait
> focusing dista
On Saturday, September 21, 2002, at 04:28 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Why not use the short extension tube? That should give you good portrait
> focusing distance.
> Paul
>
Hi Paul,
While I probably wouldn't use either of these close-up lenses for
portraits, I can see the appeal of having on
need to use a very high quality closeup
> JCOC> lens for best results.
> JCOC> JCO
>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 5:29 PM
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
use a very high quality closeup
JCOC> lens for best results.
JCOC> JCO
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 5:29 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: SMCT 135/2.5 UPDATE/sour
6 matches
Mail list logo
