On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/08/2015 2:50 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Thanks, Bill.
It wasn't one of my first choices either, as I mentioned; I passed
over it a couple of times. But all the 4 and 5-star shots from this
set are in quarantine
On 03/08/2015 2:50 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Thanks, Bill.
It wasn't one of my first choices either, as I mentioned; I passed
over it a couple of times. But all the 4 and 5-star shots from this
set are in quarantine pending a magazine submission and I was looking
for something else I could post
On 03/08/2015 2:50 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Thanks, Bill.
It wasn't one of my first choices either, as I mentioned; I passed
over it a couple of times. But all the 4 and 5-star shots from this
set are in quarantine pending a magazine submission and I was looking
for something else I could post
If one of the purposes of art is to provoke thought and discussion,
then I feel pretty good about my image. :)
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Knarf knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that it's a very grown up thing to discuss sexual exploitation,
what it is, and what it means to
Thanks, Bill.
It wasn't one of my first choices either, as I mentioned; I passed
over it a couple of times. But all the 4 and 5-star shots from this
set are in quarantine pending a magazine submission and I was looking
for something else I could post to keep the social media wheels
lubricated,
On 02/08/2015 2:14 PM, Knarf wrote:
So there's a photo of a woman naked above the waist and the viewer
has sexualized her?
Are you serious?
If you see sexualization, then that is what you see.
It may not be what someone else sees.
Bruce took that photo knowing that part of its appeal would
On 2 Aug 2015, at 20:29, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/08/2015 9:06 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Thank you very much for your kind words and support, Frank!
If it is of any comfort to you, the model, Dorrie, fully participates
in and approves of every part of the image
If you see sexualization, then that is what you see.
It may not be what someone else sees.
She's showing her tits, Bill. Please show me an adult who doesn't think that's
sexual! At this point I'm not even saying it's bad, but to deny it's sexual?
Generally speaking, exploitation doesn't
On 01/08/2015 9:06 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Thank you very much for your kind words and support, Frank!
If it is of any comfort to you, the model, Dorrie, fully participates
in and approves of every part of the image creation process.
I think this is where the whole exploitation via
Simply beautiful. Analyzing it beyond that and agonizing over the ways we view
the human form is utter nonsense. Grow up people!
Paul via phone
On Jul 29, 2015, at 4:39 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I passed by this image in my Lightroom catalogue a few times before
I think that it's a very grown up thing to discuss sexual exploitation, what
it is, and what it means to individuals and to society.
Cheers,
frank
On 2 August, 2015 5:37:03 PM EDT, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
wrote:
Simply beautiful. Analyzing it beyond that and agonizing over the
So there's a photo of a woman naked above the waist and the viewer has
sexualized her?
Are you serious?
Bruce took that photo knowing that part of its appeal would be sexual. And
Dorrie agreed to have the photo taken, knowing that sex was a part of it.
Does that mean Bruce exploited Dorrie?
Thank you very much for your kind words and support, Frank!
If it is of any comfort to you, the model, Dorrie, fully participates
in and approves of every part of the image creation process.
We discuss shoot ideas, and what we are each comfortable with. This is
decidedly not a one-sided thing
I passed by this image in my Lightroom catalogue a few times before
suddenly noticing it today and thinking how it might look with high
contrast in black and white. I quickly experimented with it, and
decided to keep the experiment.
NSFW (nudity).
I struggle with these photos because I feel uncomfortable with their
sexualization and objectification of the subject.
But I can't deny their technical and artistic brilliance.
In the end I have to admit that it's quite beautiful, which causes more inner
conflict because the feminist-ally in
A Brief And Gloriously Naughty History Of Early Erotica In Art (NSFW)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/a-brief-and-gloriously-naughty-history-of-erotica-in-art_55b65df9e4b0224d8832ecb9?
It's been around for a long, long time.
On 7/29/2015 10:35 PM, Knarf wrote:
I struggle with these
@pdml.net Subject: Re: Shadow Play n Two Parts Message-ID:
caomwt1y3gomzxhksqh3skr0mvux2-qhuhjqwadq3z8nggjw...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Both are quite interesting and
effective. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:08 PM
Both intriguing. I prefer 54540; it's restful.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Don Guthrie shark50...@gmail.com wrote:
Two BWs in the abstract motif.
Comments welcomed
http://www.flickr.com/photos/valdon/sets/72157632872580537/
They look better on the Black Background
--
PDML
The high key rendering works very well here.
Like 'em both a lot!
cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Don Guthrie shark50...@gmail.com
Sent: February 27, 2013 2/27/13
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Shadow Play n Two Parts
Two BWs in the abstract motif.
Comments welcomed
http
: Re: Shadow Play n Two Parts
Message-ID:
CAJUU0CfWpi=xsgprbxkhqczeqa2fcttyzaz8wwiqf5op8d1...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Both intriguing. I prefer 54540; it's restful.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Don Guthrieshark50...@gmail.com wrote:
Two BWs
Two BWs in the abstract motif.
Comments welcomed
http://www.flickr.com/photos/valdon/sets/72157632872580537/
They look better on the Black Background
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
Both are quite interesting and effective.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Don Guthrie shark50...@gmail.com wrote:
Two BWs in the abstract motif.
Comments welcomed
http://www.flickr.com/photos/valdon/sets/72157632872580537/
They
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013, Don Guthrie wrote:
Two BWs in the abstract motif.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/valdon/sets/72157632872580537/
Nice! I like the second one better, first one seems a bit busy. (Not
that there's anything wrong with busy, but my eye doesn't seem to know
where to go in the
It's an interesting photo, and I love shadows. The
top half of the image is -very- dark, though, and
somehow that darkness seems to bleed over onto the
photographer (his dark hair doesn't help!). I would
be tempted to play with this a bit in PS to open up
the top a bit, and introduce some
On 17/3/05, Jim Apilado, discombobulated, unleashed:
Never posted a picture before. Taken with my ancient Optio 230 at the
Experience Music Project building in Seattle, Washington.
http://www.pbase.com/lordjames/image/40931121
Jim A.
Yeah, I like it. Nice work.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Jim Apilado wrote:
Never posted a picture before. Taken with my ancient Optio 230 at the
Experience Music Project building in Seattle, Washington.
http://www.pbase.com/lordjames/image/40931121
I like the composition, the theme and the colour of the graffiti
background
The camera is OK. If it were not an auto everything, I would have done
adjustments. I did a little on PS.
Jim A.
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Jim Apilado wrote:
Never posted a picture before. Taken with my ancient Optio 230 at the
Experience Music Project building in Seattle, Washington.
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 22:47:10 -0800, Jim Apilado [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never posted a picture before. Taken with my ancient Optio 230 at the
Experience Music Project building in Seattle, Washington.
http://www.pbase.com/lordjames/image/40931121
Jim A.
Very dynamic photo! The shadow
Never posted a picture before. Taken with my ancient Optio 230 at the
Experience Music Project building in Seattle, Washington.
http://www.pbase.com/lordjames/image/40931121
Jim A.
29 matches
Mail list logo
