On Mark to Rod, was Re: Re: re: energy

2000-06-28 Thread Carrol Cox
M A Jones wrote: > Rod, I'd be happy to debate you but metaphysical assertions about 'infinite > energy' which are easily + demonstrably untrue, are not a basis for debate. > So yes, quit this silly non-debate. Mark, I agree with this in substance, but much of my caterwauling at you and Lou b

On Mark to Rod, was Re: Re: re: energy

2000-06-29 Thread Hans Ehrbar
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:10:45 -0500, Carrol Cox > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > So unless you really do agree with Hans Ehrbar on the need > for an elitist putsch to stop global warming, you had > better give some thought to how that mass support can be > (beginning now) marshalled It i

RE: On Mark to Rod, was Re: Re: re: energy

2000-06-29 Thread Max Sawicky
HE: . . . We intellectuals have to join the organizations of these committed workers and help them write a consistent programme how to avoid ecological catastrophe by a world wide proletarian revolution, and establish a minority dictatorship which will carry out this programme with Stalinist met

Re: On Mark to Rod, was Re: Re: re: energy

2000-06-29 Thread M A Jones
: "Hans Ehrbar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 3:57 PM Subject: [PEN-L:20939] On Mark to Rod, was Re: Re: re: energy > > >>>>> On Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:10:45 -0500, Carrol Cox > >>>>> <[EMAIL

Re: RE: On Mark to Rod, was Re: Re: re: energy

2000-06-29 Thread Anthony DCosta
cky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PEN-L:20946] RE: On Mark to Rod, was Re: Re: re: energy > > HE: . . . We intellectuals have to join the organizations of these > committed workers and help them write a consistent