M A Jones wrote:
> Rod, I'd be happy to debate you but metaphysical assertions about 'infinite
> energy' which are easily + demonstrably untrue, are not a basis for debate.
> So yes, quit this silly non-debate.
Mark, I agree with this in substance, but much of my caterwauling at you
and Lou b
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:10:45 -0500, Carrol Cox
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> So unless you really do agree with Hans Ehrbar on the need
> for an elitist putsch to stop global warming, you had
> better give some thought to how that mass support can be
> (beginning now) marshalled
It i
HE: . . . We intellectuals have to join the organizations of these
committed workers and help them write a consistent programme
how to avoid ecological catastrophe by a world wide
proletarian revolution, and establish a minority
dictatorship which will carry out this programme with
Stalinist met
: "Hans Ehrbar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 3:57 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:20939] On Mark to Rod, was Re: Re: re: energy
>
> >>>>> On Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:10:45 -0500, Carrol Cox
> >>>>> <[EMAIL
cky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PEN-L:20946] RE: On Mark to Rod, was Re: Re: re: energy
>
> HE: . . . We intellectuals have to join the organizations of these
> committed workers and help them write a consistent