On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 7:27 PM, David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If people can point me at some simple tests (sorry, I've not been
> following this thread), I can see what these tars do:
> NetBSD
> FreeBSD
> Irix
> Solaris
>
> They all appear to be different - at least, they all res
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 12:53:33PM -0700, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
> There is also still an issue using gnu tar if you run as root.
> And are there other tar programs?
Unfortunately yes.
If people can point me at some simple tests (sorry, I've not been
following this thread), I can see what these tar
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Eric Wilhelm
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, sorry. 0. It has a default which is opposite of gnu tar.
>
>>If it's that easy, I can go patch CPAN.pm right away.
Done: CPAN.pm is patched in trunk.
> And CPANPLUS I guess. I'm not sure what else happens in
> Arch
# from David Golden
# on Tuesday 23 September 2008 12:42:
>> So, something needs to set $Archive::Tar::CHMOD = 1; to make it
>> behave like gnu tar.
>
>$Archive::Tar::CHMOD = 1 or 0?
>
>The default is 1. From the Pod:
Yeah, sorry. 0. It has a default which is opposite of gnu tar.
>If it's that
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Eric Wilhelm
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, something needs to set $Archive::Tar::CHMOD = 1; to make it behave
> like gnu tar.
$Archive::Tar::CHMOD = 1 or 0?
The default is 1. From the Pod:
By default, Archive::Tar will try to chmod your files to whatever mode
# from Shlomi Fish
# on Tuesday 23 September 2008 03:00:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] Data-Dump-Streamer-2.08-40]$ ls -l Makefile.PL
>-rwxrwxrwx 1 cpan cpan 3792 2006-04-16 18:33 Makefile.PL*
Apparently that is using Archive::Tar by way of Archive::Extract (says
bingos.)
So, something needs to set $Archi
Hi,
I have recently been taking more notice of CPANTS and made some changes
to DBD::ODBC to get more "kwalitee". I'm basically getting a fail on
has_test_pod (http://cpants.perl.org/dist/kwalitee/DBD-ODBC) which I've
duplicated myself with Module::CPANTS::Analyse. However, I have a pod
test (
On Sep 23, 2008, at 6:30 AM, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:37:55 +0200, andreas.koenig.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas J. Koenig) said:
(d) Something else
I lean toward PAUSE not indexing them thus pulling the plug as early
as possible.
And so I have implemented it now. If
Ovid writes:
> --- On Tue, 23/9/08, Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The default Mandriva umask appears to be 0002 .
>
> That surprised me
In general 0002 (aka u=rwx,g=rwx,o=rx) is the right choice of umask on a
sytem where each user has their own group -- that is, where the user
o
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:00:41 -0400, "David Golden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> Problem 1: race condition between unarchiving and execution if
> Makefile.PL or Build.PL is world writable (ditto test files as well)
> (a) Have CPAN and CPANPLUS refuse to run 'perl *.PL' if the PL
On Tuesday 23 September 2008, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
> # from Ovid
>
> # on Tuesday 23 September 2008 00:54:
> >Of course, even as Eric pointed out, a umask of 0002 still masks the
> > world writeable permissions, so I still don't see how you're getting
> > there and if you've configured your system
On Tuesday 23 September 2008, Ovid wrote:
> --- On Tue, 23/9/08, Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The default Mandriva umask appears to be 0002 .
>
> That surprised me, so I googled "default mandriva umask". All the
> references I found say the default umask is 0022 ... unless ...
>
> Ma
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:37:55 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas J. Koenig)
> said:
>> (d) Something else
> I lean toward PAUSE not indexing them thus pulling the plug as early
> as possible.
And so I have implemented it now. If it breaks too much in too short
time, we could probab
# from Ovid
# on Tuesday 23 September 2008 00:54:
>Of course, even as Eric pointed out, a umask of 0002 still masks the
> world writeable permissions, so I still don't see how you're getting
> there and if you've configured your system to give *you* a umask of
> 0022, then you still shouldn't be
--- On Tue, 23/9/08, Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The default Mandriva umask appears to be 0002 .
That surprised me, so I googled "default mandriva umask". All the references I
found say the default umask is 0022 ... unless ...
Mandriva offers a tool to control security settings.
On Tuesday 23 September 2008, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
> # from Shlomi Fish
>
> # on Monday 22 September 2008 23:55:
> >> There would be no "mechanism" because tar respects the umask by
> >> default when invoked as a non-root user. Thus, there are no
> >> world-writable files being unpacked from CPAN d
# from Shlomi Fish
# on Monday 22 September 2008 23:55:
>> There would be no "mechanism" because tar respects the umask by
>> default when invoked as a non-root user. Thus, there are no
>> world-writable files being unpacked from CPAN dists on my machine.
>>
>> Is a umask of 022 not the default s
17 matches
Mail list logo
