Before doing any more work on this benchmarking project, I was wondering
if any one else thinks the effort is worth it.
Although it is early days, it seemed reasonable to start setting up a
framework for benchmarking perl6 algorithms against
implementations/releases and against other language
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Richard Hainsworth
wrote:
> Before doing any more work on this benchmarking project, I was wondering if
> any one else thinks the effort is worth it.
Assuming that perl6 here == rakudo on parrot, I and others on the
parrot dev team would definitely find these hel
On Sun, 2011-13-02 at 20:27 +0300, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> Before doing any more work on this benchmarking project, I was wondering
> if any one else thinks the effort is worth it.
Me. I hope to get started in a couple of weeks once my accounting is
done.
>
> Although it is early days, it
On 02/13/2011 11:16 PM, Guy Hulbert wrote:
I am only interested in perl5, perl6 and C to start.
I havent got the C or java languages to work yet.
but re-organize the documentation a bit as I'm more interested in the
framework than the specific results -- except for how perl6 compares
wit
Thanks for the encouragement.
On 02/13/2011 11:02 PM, Will Coleda wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Richard Hainsworth
wrote:
Before doing any more work on this benchmarking project, I was wondering if
any one else thinks the effort is worth it.
Assuming that perl6 here == rakudo on p
Some comments on what I plan to do after my 2 week hibernation.
On Sun, 2011-13-02 at 20:27 +0300, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> see http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/ for more info on the
> algorithms.
>
> There are many factors that can be considered when benchmarking,
> including IO and OS.
>
Sorry, forgot.
On Sun, 2011-13-02 at 20:27 +0300, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> It seemed to me it would be a good idea to fix on some "elegant" form of
> the perl6 implementation.
Yes!!
In fact, it would be useful to provide at least TWO versions: a
"standard" one and one that is optimised for
Guy Hulbert writes:
> I am interested first in developing a generic framework around the
> work already done for 'the benchmark game' (TBG*). I will pretend
> that I am starting from scratch and define a protocol for adding
> algorithms and exchanging information.
>
> I have been convinced that e
On 02/14/11 16:47, Guy Hulbert wrote:
Some comments on what I plan to do after my 2 week hibernation.
On Sun, 2011-13-02 at 20:27 +0300, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
see http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/ for more info on the
algorithms.
There are many factors that can be considered when benchmar
On Mon, 2011-14-02 at 15:56 +0100, Steffen Schwigon wrote:
> If on the other side, you already have some more experiences on this
> topic I would love to hear comments and ideas to apply them to my
> Perl5 benchmarking.
Thanks Steffen.
I will look at this when I get started in two weeks.
If you
On Mon, 2011-14-02 at 18:16 +0300, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> On 02/14/11 16:47, Guy Hulbert wrote:
> > Some comments on what I plan to do after my 2 week hibernation.
[snip]
> > I am interested first in developing a generic framework around the work
> > already done for 'the benchmark game' (TBG*
Last one.
On Mon, 2011-14-02 at 18:16 +0300, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> I am trying to get the c and cc working, as these require a compilation
> step prior to running the program.
When I tried C, I got a single error multiple times for two different
programs. I think my version of gcc is jus
12 matches
Mail list logo
