On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 11:13, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> > Since PG doesn't have active-active clustering, that's out, but since
> > the database will be very static, why not have, say 8 machines, each
> > with it's own copy of the database? (Since there are so few updates,
> > you feed the u
Folks,
> Since PG doesn't have active-active clustering, that's out, but since
> the database will be very static, why not have, say 8 machines, each
> with it's own copy of the database? (Since there are so few updates,
> you feed the updates to a litle Perl app that then makes the changes
> on
On 25 Jul 2003 at 18:41, Kasim Oztoprak wrote:
> what exactly do you mean from a pilot program?
Like get a quad CPU box, load the data and ask only 10 operators to test the
system..
Beta testing basically..
Bye
Shridhar
--
The man on tops walks a lonely street; the "chain" of command is often
On 25 Jul 2003 17:13 EEST you wrote:
> On 25 Jul 2003 at 16:38, Kasim Oztoprak wrote:
> > this is kind of directory assistance application. actually the select statements
> > are not
> > very complex. the database contain 25 million subscriber records and the operators
> > searches
> > for the
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 11:38, Kasim Oztoprak wrote:
> On 24 Jul 2003 23:25 EEST you wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 13:25, Kasim Oztoprak wrote:
> > > On 24 Jul 2003 17:08 EEST you wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 24 Jul 2003 at 15:54, Kasim Oztoprak wrote:
> > [snip]
> > >
> > > we do not have memory
On 24 Jul 2003 at 9:42, William Yu wrote:
> As far as I can tell, the performance impact seems to be minimal.
> There's a periodic storm of replication updates in cases where there's
> mass updates sync last resync. But if you have mostly reads and few
> writes, you shouldn't see this situation
On 25 Jul 2003 at 16:38, Kasim Oztoprak wrote:
> this is kind of directory assistance application. actually the select statements are
> not
> very complex. the database contain 25 million subscriber records and the operators
> searches
> for the subscriber numbers or addresses. there are not muc
On 24 Jul 2003 23:25 EEST you wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 13:25, Kasim Oztoprak wrote:
> > On 24 Jul 2003 17:08 EEST you wrote:
> >
> > > On 24 Jul 2003 at 15:54, Kasim Oztoprak wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > we do not have memory problem or disk problems. as I have seen in the list the
> > best wa
On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 13:25, Kasim Oztoprak wrote:
> On 24 Jul 2003 17:08 EEST you wrote:
>
> > On 24 Jul 2003 at 15:54, Kasim Oztoprak wrote:
[snip]
>
> we do not have memory problem or disk problems. as I have seen in the list the best
> way to
> use disks are using raid 10 for data and raid
| first of all I would like to learn that, any of you use the postgresql
| within the clustered environment? Or, let me ask you the question, in
| different manner, can we use postgresql in a cluster environment? If
| we can do what is the support method of the postgresql for clusters?
You could do
On 24 Jul 2003 18:44 EEST you wrote:
> > Now, the second question is related to the performance of the database. Assuming
> > we have a
> > dell's poweredge 6650 with 4 x 2.8 Ghz Xeon processors having 2 MB of cache for
> > each, with the
> > main memory of lets say 32 GB. We can either use a sm
> Now, the second question is related to the performance of the database. Assuming we
> have a
> dell's poweredge 6650 with 4 x 2.8 Ghz Xeon processors having 2 MB of cache for
> each, with the
> main memory of lets say 32 GB. We can either use a small SAN from EMC or we can put
> all disks
> in
On 24 Jul 2003 17:08 EEST you wrote:
> On 24 Jul 2003 at 15:54, Kasim Oztoprak wrote:
>
> > The questions for this explanation are:
> > 1 - Can we use postgresql within clustered environment?
> > 2 - if the answer is yes, in which method can we use postgresql within a
> > cluster?
>
On 24 Jul 2003 at 15:54, Kasim Oztoprak wrote:
> The questions for this explanation are:
> 1 - Can we use postgresql within clustered environment?
> 2 - if the answer is yes, in which method can we use postgresql within a
> cluster?
> active - passive or active - active?
Couple
hello,
some of my questions may not be related to this group however, I know that some
of them are directly related to this list.
first of all I would like to learn that, any of you use the postgresql within the
clustered environment? Or, let me ask you the question, in different manner,
can w
15 matches
Mail list logo
