pinholeren...@netscape.net wrote:
>
> yes I was using polaroid 4x5 color film-it was a shady area which most likely
> added to the blue tint .
My experience with 4x5 Polaroid film is that even small deviations
outside of the normal exposure range will generate considerable
reciprocity failure p
Hello- I'm totally new to this wonderful medium and have a gazillion questions-
however- for the moment- can anyone share with me the basics on making a
panorama camera- something simple- and is there a way to use a film base that
is color- that doesn't require a darkroom with color abilities?
I
Meeting at Photo Expo 2000 is fine with me.
Kathy Tracy
In a message dated 10/23/00 10:13:22 PM, ska...@aol.com writes:
<< The afternoon of
Sunday, October 29 would work the best for me.
>>
Kathy.
I can't make it that afternoon. It's my Birthday weekend and lots of family
doin's.
I hope some of you get together. We had a great time last time we met
Thomas Harvey wrote:
>
> I have just uploaded a couple of images to my server. Both were
> taken with an old Ansco 6x9 folding camera. I ripped the folding
> front door and bellows out, put a plate and pinhole across the front.
> I think the focal length is about 19mm.
>
> Tom
>
> http://web.pdx
yes I was using polaroid 4x5 color film-it was a shady area which most likely
added to the blue tint .
pinhole-discussion@p at ??? wrote:
>
> This is a beautiful image, Chip. Pinhole is humbling in its failures;
> but the successful surprizes are all the more succulent. Or, one
> attaboy wip
Thanks!
- Original Message -
From: "r"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 7:49 PM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] new image
> hello,
> Somehow I got your email for a fellow pinhole lover- just wanted to
let you
> know it didn't reach your intended pal.
hello,
Somehow I got your email for a fellow pinhole lover- just wanted to let you
know it didn't reach your intended pal.
rp
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Miller"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] new image
> This is a beautiful image, Chip
This is a beautiful image, Chip. Pinhole is humbling in its failures;
but the successful surprizes are all the more succulent. Or, one
attaboy wipes out all the awshits, as they useta say, sorta. By the
way, are you working with a Polaroid holder and film?
- Original Message -
From:
T
Thanks for the replies. Here are answers to a few questions.
Thomas Harvey wrote:
>
> I have just uploaded a couple of images to my server. Both were
> taken with an old Ansco 6x9 folding camera. I ripped the folding
> front door and bellows out, put a plate and pinhole across the front.
> I
Both are really nice. It always amazes me just how a "sharp" pin hole photo
has a certain quality that you just can't get from glass/plastic.
thanks
andy
-Original Message-
From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???
[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Thomas Harvey
Well it looks like you've given birth to a great image!!
thanks
andy
-Original Message-
From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???
[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of
pinholeren...@netscape.net
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 7:33 AM
To: pinhole-discussion@p at
There is a show in NY called the PHOTO Expo 2000 which runs Thursday thru
Saturday. I'll be there parts of Thursday & Friday & would love to get
together with a ph group!! Maybe we should open up an alternative booth
(card table) outside of the exhibit... 8o)
andy schmitt
-Original Message---
With regard to the Polacolor 59 film, I think Tom already answered the
question...but I've
used this film a lot, and it definitely has a real problem with color,
specifically when
the exposure times get the least bit lengthy (more than 2 seconds!). This film
also tends
to have a blueish/greenis
Some of the plastic cameras have the same problem. What I do is fold a piece
of cardboard, such as the box my 120 film came in. I have to tare off a bit
on the side, and then put it under my roll of film. It works like a spring,
holding the spools in place. Not having done this with 6x9 Lochkamera
Tom,
I've got a couple of old 6x9 cameras which got the same treatment as
yours. They're a lot of fun to use. I find that your pictures have
much less light fall-off than what I get with mine. I wonder why. Did
you do any correction in the printing (like dodging the center part?)
Guy Glorieux
On mine both spools stay tightly rolled. There is a mechanism that
prevents the take-up spool from turning backwards. It is quite
nicely engineered for such a simple design.
I use a small flashlight to view the frae numbers when winding the film.
Mike Vande Bunt
Soren Svensson wrote:
> > The
Mea culpa. Sorry to have sent this to the list. I meant to
reply privately but hit the send button before I checked the
address on the email.
>
> > http://web.pdx.edu/~harveyt/USsundialPin.jpg
>
> Is that a real working sundial? And where is it?
> And would you mind if I sent a note a
Just looked at your new image and all I can say is this:
That's why we keep on pinholing, right [smile].
Just curious: Is it a black/white pic blue-toned or how did you
achieve that hue?
Erich
http://www.fotair.de
> http://web.pdx.edu/~harveyt/USsundialPin.jpg
Is that a real working sundial? And where is it?
And would you mind if I sent a note about your picture to the
sundial mailing list?
I have been having a hard time getting any usable images from my finney -
then this one popped out .
http://imagehost.auctionwatch.com/bin/viewimage.x/001071f3/grays/pinhole1.JPG
chip renner
> I have just uploaded a couple of images to my server. Both were
> taken with an old Ansco 6x9 folding camera. I ripped the folding
> front door and bellows out, put a plate and pinhole across the front.
> I think the focal length is about 19mm.
what do you mean : 'ripped out'? (sorry, non-a
> I have just uploaded a couple of images to my server. Both were
> taken with an old Ansco 6x9 folding camera. I ripped the folding
> front door and bellows out, put a plate and pinhole across the front.
> I think the focal length is about 19mm.
what do you mean : 'ripped out'? (sorry, non-a
> There isn't much to discuss there, but the wind knob isn't geared
> and it's
> not all that smooth, but that's not a big deal. The back fits reasonably
> well for a wood-to-wood connection.
Thanks for the good info.
I do have a follow-up question though.
Right now I have a 6x9 Lochkamera
(http
At 10:16 PM 10/23/00, Soren Svensson wrote:
I'm seriously considering buying the Zero 2000 and I think there are some
people on this list that have and I would like to get some input from you.
Is the camera as good as it looks on the website?
If you're talking about it's appearance, yes, at le
I'm seriously considering buying the Zero 2000 and I think there are some
people on this list that have and I would like to get some input from you.
Is the camera as good as it looks on the website?
How about fit and finish?
Would you recommend it?
Is it worth the price?
I did find some strange d
At 09:22 PM 10/23/00, Thomas Harvey wrote:
I have just uploaded a couple of images to my server. Both were taken
with an old Ansco 6x9 folding camera. I ripped the folding front door and
bellows out, put a plate and pinhole across the front. I think the focal
length is about 19mm.
Tom
http
I have just uploaded a couple of images to my server. Both were
taken with an old Ansco 6x9 folding camera. I ripped the folding
front door and bellows out, put a plate and pinhole across the front.
I think the focal length is about 19mm.
Tom
http://web.pdx.edu/~harveyt/USsundialPin.jpg
ht
28 matches
Mail list logo