> Personally, I compile those critical system things myself from
> source, not packages. That includes perl, apache, python, gcc, yadda yadda.
Yeah, me too.
> Nothing we have in there really is such
> a new whizbang feature as to require the 2.x series (yet). We should
> continue to suppor
> 2.0 is available in debian-unstable, but for some reason isn't in
> debian-testing. 2.0 seems to be the default for SuSe. I'm not sure how
> to figure out what the default is for RH 7.x.
The Redhat 7.2 that I've been running for about a month has 1.5.2 by
default, but python 2.0.1 wa
> There is an "excuses" or "reasons" file or similar which you can check to
> find out.
MJ, can you please provide a URL for that file, so we could check on
the reason? But my point was that Python 2.x for Debian is available.
Bill
> 2.0 is available in debian-unstable, but for some reason isn't in
> debian-testing. [...]
There is an "excuses" or "reasons" file or similar which you can check to
find out. The most common causes are not building on one of the debian
core platforms, or something which it depends on has an uns
Some good calls, David. I'll update the ImageParser so that with
verbosity=2 you'll get an indication of the size of any images output.
The reason you're getting two different values when you specify only
one of alt-max{width,height} is that the one you *didn't* specify is
drawn from the regular
> I suggest a small block of new options:
>
> --font=std,bold,large,largebold,narrow
>
> If we're moving towards storing the actual font value in the
> database itself, why not put a pointer there to specify it upon creation?
I don't think I understand this suggestion, David.
> FYI: i could _not_ reproduce this bug on Windows (Tested with the
Well, as long as you think it's a bug, I'll make sure it doesn't
happen on Unix either :-).
Bill
> I don't think we should "stall" our development just because python 2
> isn't available on all systems. It's not like the "old" parser will
> disappear (and neither is 2.x bleeding edge:)
2.0 is available in debian-unstable, but for some reason isn't in
debian-testing. 2.0 seems to be the defa
> In English FYI:
>
> Hans-Peter asked two feature wishes:
Thanks for translating this. I'm sure many of us were wondering what
exactly he had asked. Babelfish and other translators don't quite do well.
My Deutsch is very rusty.
/d
"Kunal" == Kunal Taneja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kunal> I have downloaded the PIL library windows distribution from the link that
Kunal> you just sent
I have send you the link to the plucker distribution.
This mean that the Setup program inclaude _all_ the files you need to
run Plucker on Wi
"Hans-Peter" == Hans-Peter Fieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hans-Peter> Ich wünsche mir die Möglichkeit, text im plucker zu
Hans-Peter> markieren und wie URLs in einen Merkzettel zu kopieren.
Daran wird gerade gearbeitet. Wann diese Funktion verfügbar sein wird
kann ich allerdings nicht sagen.
"Bill" == Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bill> What I've found is that if we have a pointed-to-by-a-link separate
Bill> image, it too will be scaled to fit 'maxwidth' and/or 'maxheight',
Bill> even though it's on a page by itself, and *another* separate image
Bill> will be linked from i
"Bill" == Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I'm going to pursue this a bit further on Windows, first. There must
>> be some way to write binary output.
Bill> import sys
Bill> if sys.platform == "win32":
Bill> import os, msvcrt
Bill> msvcrt.setmode(sys.stdout.fileno(), os.
I suggest a small block of new options:
--font=std,bold,large,largebold,narrow
If we're moving towards storing the actual font value in the
database itself, why not put a pointer there to specify it upon creation?
/d
Hello listers,
Because this is my first post to this list, I'd like to thank all developers
for great work.
My question is - is it possible or easy to write to use Plucker with other
applications ? For example I'd like to have HTML help for my program, and to
do this I could call plucker to
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001, MATSUMOTO Masakazu wrote:
> Then I say, the same trouble i posted on Aug. 11 occured, i.e.
> "Delete All" leaves some document in the current category.
> Did you try to do that?
Yes, and everything worked as expected. That doesn't mean there can't
be a problem, but if I can'
16 matches
Mail list logo