On Aug 27, 2005, at 17:46, Jeff Lowrey wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 05:16:06PM -0400, Rocco Caputo wrote:
On Aug 26, 2005, at 16:27, Jeff Lowrey wrote:
use POE::Component::Server::MDP::POEQueueProvider;
Wow, that's long, and Provider seems to overlap with Server.
POE::Component::MDP:
On Aug 27, 2005, at 17:26, Erick Calder wrote:
On Aug 26, 2005, at 16:27, Jeff Lowrey wrote:
use POE::Component::Server::MDP::POEQueueProvider;
is a server really a component? wouldn't POE::Server::MDP make
more sense?
As far as I know, applications don't need namespaces at all. If
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 05:16:06PM -0400, Rocco Caputo wrote:
On Aug 26, 2005, at 16:27, Jeff Lowrey wrote:
use POE::Component::Server::MDP::POEQueueProvider;
Wow, that's long, and Provider seems to overlap with Server.
POE::Component::MDP::QueueProvider still has some length to it, but
it
On Aug 26, 2005, at 12:40, Abhishek Jain wrote:
Dear Friends,
I have a task to do.I need to send SMS using SMPP protocol .It is a
'Application Layer TCP protocol'.
I do understand POE but never had a chance to implement a protocol.
Can anyone here suggest me how to do so , I mean how to creat
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 05:16:06PM -0400, Rocco Caputo wrote:
> On Aug 26, 2005, at 16:27, Jeff Lowrey wrote:
>
> >I'm in what I hope is final testing before releasing a public beta
> >of a set of modules that act as POE components to provide Message
> >Driven Perl services - in the vein of a
> On Aug 26, 2005, at 16:27, Jeff Lowrey wrote:
>
>> use POE::Component::Server::MDP::POEQueueProvider;
is a server really a component? wouldn't POE::Server::MDP make more sense?
On Aug 26, 2005, at 16:27, Jeff Lowrey wrote:
I'm in what I hope is final testing before releasing a public beta
of a set of modules that act as POE components to provide Message
Driven Perl services - in the vein of a JMS provider.
The intent is that someone will be able to do something si