Re: dsniff segfaults

2006-01-29 Thread Travers Buda
On Sunday 29 January 2006 08:25, Nikolay Sturm wrote: > * Frank Denis (Jedi/Sector One) [2006-01-24]: > > ports/dsniff always seems to always crash with SEGV after a few > > seconds on 3.9-beta x86. I've seen this behavior on 3.8-release but I no longer have the box with me that did it.

new: naim-0.11.8.1

2006-03-28 Thread Travers Buda
naim is a ncurses client for AOL Instant Messenger (AIM), AOL I Seek You (ICQ), Internet Relay Chat (IRC), and The lily CMC. Tested and works fine on i386. Buggy on sparc64, added to NOT_FOR_ARCHS. Please test, especially amd64. Travers Buda naim-0.11.8.1.tgz Description: application/tgz

strange behavior of gecko-based browsers, AMD64, 3.9

2006-05-08 Thread Travers Buda
I've been experiencing slow rendering (mostly with large images) and random crashing with the gecko-based browsers on 3.9 on AMD64. Same browsers on 64 bit linux behave properly and are snappy. The network is not at fault for the slow rendering. I've been unable to stick my finger on what is causi

Re: strange behavior of gecko-based browsers, AMD64, 3.9

2006-05-08 Thread Travers Buda
m going to look at that and their changelogs. Meanwhile, could you please test with 2.2.5 fvwm? If someone can duplicate what I'm getting, then I'll see what I can do about tracking down atleast this bug. On 5/8/06, Jim Capozzoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Travers Buda wrote

Re: strange behavior of gecko-based browsers, AMD64, 3.9

2006-05-10 Thread Travers Buda
Ok, thanks for the testing and replies all, it must be isolated to me. Good! Travers

Re: Bind 9 port?

2006-08-16 Thread Travers Buda
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:32:09 -0600 "W S" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greetings, > > I'm wondering if there is anyone working on a port of Bind 9.x? > > Thanks, > Will http://openbsd.org/faq/faq1.html#Included And improvements, too. Travers Buda

New VLC out.

2006-12-12 Thread Travers Buda
Version 0.8.6 VLC is out. It does not compile right out of the box. A patch or two should be required. no_dvd is still mentioned in DESCR. Travers Buda

Re: on current, Xvnc core dumps on amd64 (with an intel dual core

2007-01-01 Thread Travers Buda
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 13:34:16 +0100 Didier Wiroth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > I'm trying to use tightvnc-1.2.9p0 on current amd64 (with intel dual core > cpu). Perhaps one of these is at fault: http://geek.com/images/geeknews/2006Jan/core_duo_errata__2006_01_21__full.gif Travers Buda

Re: on current, Xvnc core dumps on amd64 (with an intel dual core

2007-01-01 Thread Travers Buda
On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 17:39:00 +0100 (CET) Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Jan 2007, Travers Buda wrote: > > > On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 13:34:16 +0100 > > Didier Wiroth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > >

Re: on current, Xvnc core dumps on amd64 (with an intel dual core

2007-01-01 Thread Travers Buda
64 clawhammer_. What hardware are you running, Nikns? Intel, AMD...? Travers Buda

Re: DRM in xpdf

2008-04-25 Thread Travers Buda
nge functionality. This is no secret; upstream would be foolish to not consider the platform and patches their software is running on and with if they get a bug report. There is plenty of precedent for this sort of thing. Plus, xpdf is GPL 2, so we're not dealing with some sort of Iceweasel or Apache type malarkey. It's not an issue. -- Travers Buda

Re: DRM in xpdf

2008-04-25 Thread Travers Buda
* Martin Schr?der <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-25 17:32:26]: > 2008/4/25 Travers Buda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > There is plenty of precedent for this sort of thing. Plus, xpdf > > is GPL 2, so we're not dealing with some sort of Iceweasel or Apache > &

Re: DRM in xpdf

2008-04-25 Thread Travers Buda
* Martin Schr?der <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-25 23:23:17]: > 2008/4/25 Travers Buda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > This part? > > Troll. > > Wow. -- Travers Buda

Re: DRM in xpdf

2008-04-25 Thread Travers Buda
ve to this than the nice unified diffs existing in the ports tree. The GPL is being followed. DRM is stupid. Oh wait, as a matter of fact, the two are ideologically opposed to each other! Get a grip. -- Travers Buda

Re: patch for graphics/GraphicsMagick

2007-03-30 Thread Travers Buda
ss_version' > png.c:1721: error: `png_ptr' undeclared (first use in this function) > png.c:1721: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > png.c:1721: error: for each function it appears in.) > *** Error code 1 I've seen this one too, on amd64; it fails every time. -- Travers Buda

Re: important: people following -current

2007-04-10 Thread Travers Buda
gt; For some reason that website won't load for me, so I used > Matthieu's instructions which worked on the first try. > Thanks to Jesse and Matthieu both. > ... See release(8) and the README in the xenocara tree. That should be all you need to build xenocara. I've been fetching the sources via cvs off rt.fm -- Travers Buda

Re: NEW: geo/proj

2007-04-20 Thread Travers Buda
.. I don't have any data lying around to test it with (perhaps you could provide?) I cleaned up the Makefile a little bit, but looks good... a good job especially since you've been running Open a day now. =) I'd like to see some GIS software in OpenBSD so I welcome your efforts. -- Travers Buda proj.tar.gz Description: application/tar-gz

Re: NEW: geo/proj

2007-04-20 Thread Travers Buda
.000 < 79d58'00.000"W 36d58'00.000"N 0.0 79d58'W 36d58'N 0.000 --- > 79d58'00.000"W 37d02'00.000"N 0.0 79d58'0.005"W 37d1'59.998"N 0.000 > 79d58'00.000"W 36d58'00.000"N 0.0 79d57'59.128"W 36d58'0.501"N 0.000 > 79d58'00.000"W 37d02'00.000"N 0.0 79d57'59.126"W 37d2'0.501"N 0.000 > 79d58'00.000"W 36d58'00.000"N 0.0 79d57'59.128"W 36d58'0.501"N 0.000 21c21 < 79d00'00.000"W 35d00'00.000"N 0.0 79dW34d59'57.975"N 718.018 --- > 79d00'00.000"W 35d00'00.000"N 0.0 78d59'59.107"W 34d59'58.563"N 718.018 39,40c39,40 < 0d00'00.000"W 0d00'00.000"N 0.0 6378137.00 0.00 0.00 < 0d00'00.000"W 0d00'00.000"N 10.0 6378147.00 0.00 0.00 --- > 0d00'00.000"W 0d00'00.000"N 0.0 6378137.00 -0.00 0.00 > 0d00'00.000"W 0d00'00.000"N 10.0 6378147.00 -0.00 0.00 42c42 < 0d00'00.000"W 90d00'00.000"N 0.0 0.000.00 6356752.31 --- > 0d00'00.000"W 90d00'00.000"N 0.0 0.00-0.00 6356752.31 PROBLEMS HAVE OCCURED test file td_out saved -- Travers Buda

Re: Remove x11/ion

2007-04-30 Thread Travers Buda
unencumbered port works, no point in removing it over spite. -- Travers Buda

Re: Remove x11/ion

2007-04-30 Thread Travers Buda
See http://www.flickr.com/photos/i-capture/16136112/ for an artistic example we can base it off of. Banana, mofo, do you speak it? But in all seriousness, FreeIon sounds good. Little bit easier to figure out just what the hell it is. Anyone serious about sed'ing this port to hell? -- Travers Buda